What are the benefits, risks, and alternatives of a non-hormonal Intrauterine Device (IUD)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Non-Hormonal IUD: Benefits, Risks, and Alternatives

The copper IUD is a highly effective, hormone-free contraceptive option with a failure rate of less than 1%, effective for at least 10 years, and provides immediate return to fertility upon removal. 1

Benefits of the Copper (Non-Hormonal) IUD

Contraceptive Efficacy

  • Highly effective contraception with typical failure rates of less than 1% per year, comparable to sterilization 1
  • Effective for at least 10 years (approved for 10 years, with data supporting use up to 12 years) 1
  • Does not require daily adherence or user action after insertion, making it more effective than methods requiring consistent user compliance 1

Non-Contraceptive Benefits

  • No hormonal side effects - completely hormone-free option 1
  • No increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), making it ideal for patients with thrombotic risk factors 1
  • Immediate return to fertility upon removal with no waiting period required 2
  • Can be used as emergency contraception with the highest efficacy (<1% failure rate) when inserted within 5 days of unprotected intercourse 1

Special Population Benefits

  • Safe for immunocompromised patients, including those with HIV, on immunosuppressive therapy, or solid organ transplant recipients 1
  • Safe for breastfeeding women and can be inserted immediately postpartum 3
  • First-line option for patients with contraindications to estrogen, including history of deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or coronary events 3
  • Appropriate for nulliparous adolescents - does not cause tubal infertility 1

Risks and Side Effects of the Copper IUD

Common Side Effects

  • Increased menstrual bleeding and cramping, particularly during the first several months after insertion 1
  • Heavier menstrual flow compared to baseline 3
  • These symptoms typically improve over time but may persist in some users 1

Insertion-Related Complications

  • Expulsion occurs in 5-10% of cases within 5 years, with recurrence in approximately 30% of those who experience expulsion 3
  • Uterine perforation is rare (0.6 to 16 per 1000 insertions), with higher risk when inserted less than 4-6 weeks postpartum or post-abortion 3
  • Pain, bleeding, and syncope during insertion reported in less than 1.5% of cases 3

Infection Risk

  • Small increased risk of pelvic infection during the first 20 days after insertion, but not beyond this period 1, 3
  • Approximately 6 pelvic infections per 1000 woman-years of use 3
  • No increased infection risk in immunocompromised patients, including those with HIV or on immunosuppressive therapy 1
  • Pre-existing asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection increases early infection risk 3

Pregnancy-Related Risks

  • Ectopic pregnancy: While ectopic pregnancies are rarer in IUD users than in women using no contraception, approximately 1 in 20 pregnancies that occur with an IUD in place is ectopic 3
  • Intrauterine pregnancies with IUD in place generally end in miscarriage; about 25% result in live birth if device left in place versus 90% if removed 3

Contraindications

  • Current or recent (past 3 months) pelvic inflammatory disease 1
  • Current gonorrhea, chlamydia, or purulent cervicitis 1
  • Pregnancy 1, 4
  • Uterine anomalies that distort the cavity incompatible with insertion 1
  • Unexplained vaginal bleeding (postpone insertion until evaluated) 3

Important caveat: High risk of STIs is considered by CDC as level 2-3 (benefits may or may not outweigh risks), though screening can be performed at insertion with subsequent treatment without IUD removal 1

Alternatives to the Copper IUD

Hormonal IUD (Levonorgestrel-Releasing)

  • Similar contraceptive efficacy (failure rate <1%) but effective for 3-7 years depending on formulation 1
  • Reduces menstrual bleeding - may cause amenorrhea in 35% of users after 2 years, making it preferable for those with heavy menses or on anticoagulation 1, 3
  • No increased VTE risk (RR 0.61,95% CI 0.24-1.53) 1
  • May cause irregular bleeding/spotting initially, plus hormonal side effects (headache, acne, breast tension, functional ovarian cysts) 3

Progestin-Only Pills

  • Less effective than IUDs (typical failure rate ~9%) and require strict daily adherence 1
  • No increased VTE risk (RR 0.90,95% CI 0.57-1.45) 1
  • Appropriate alternative for patients unable or unwilling to use an IUD 1

Progestin Implant (Etonogestrel)

  • Highest contraceptive efficacy (failure rate 0.05%) among all methods 1
  • Effective for 3 years with minimal to no bone loss 1
  • No estrogen-associated risks 1

Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate (DMPA)

  • Typical failure rate ~6%, administered every 12 weeks 1
  • Black box warning for decreased bone density (normalizes after cessation) 1
  • Not recommended for patients with positive antiphospholipid antibodies due to increased VTE risk (RR 2.67,95% CI 1.29-5.53) 1
  • Delays return to fertility up to 18 months 1

Combined Hormonal Contraceptives (Pills, Patch, Ring)

  • Contraindicated in multiple conditions: decompensated cirrhosis, graft failure, hepatic adenomas, history of VTE, positive antiphospholipid antibodies, multiple cardiovascular risk factors 1
  • VTE risk 36 times higher than baseline in healthy women 1
  • Acceptable in compensated cirrhosis and most other chronic liver diseases 1

Barrier Methods and Natural Family Planning

  • Significantly less effective than IUDs but no systemic effects
  • Appropriate for those declining long-acting methods or with contraindications to all other options

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

IUD Removal and Return to Fertility

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Insertion and removal of intrauterine devices.

American family physician, 2005

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.