What is the indication for UFT (Uracil and Tegafur)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

UFT Indication

UFT (tegafur and uracil) is indicated as an oral fluoropyrimidine alternative to intravenous 5-FU/leucovorin for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, and has demonstrated efficacy in the adjuvant setting for resected stage I-III colorectal cancer, particularly in Asian populations. 1

Primary Indications

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

  • UFT plus oral leucovorin serves as an alternative to intravenous 5-FU/LV as monotherapy for first-line palliative chemotherapy in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. 1
  • The experience and database with capecitabine is more extensive than with UFT in Western populations, making capecitabine the preferred oral fluoropyrimidine in most guidelines. 1
  • UFT 300 mg/m²/day in three divided doses plus oral leucovorin 150 mg/day (50 mg three times daily) for 28 days every 5 weeks produces response rates of approximately 20-42% in advanced colorectal cancer. 2, 3

Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Colorectal Cancer

  • UFT/leucovorin has shown benefit in the adjuvant setting after curative resection of colorectal liver metastases, particularly in patients with multiple metastases. 1
  • A phase III trial demonstrated improved recurrence-free survival with UFT/LV versus surgery alone in the subgroup with multiple liver metastases (P=0.019). 1
  • UFT has been shown to be equally effective with comparable toxicity when compared with bolus 5-FU/FA in patients both younger and older than 60 years. 1

Additional Cancer Indications

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (Stage IA)

  • Japanese trials suggest UFT given continuously for up to 2 years may benefit patients with resected stage IA adenocarcinoma, though this remains controversial in Western practice. 1
  • A pooled meta-analysis suggested benefit of UFT for patients with resected primarily adenocarcinoma, stage IA disease. 1
  • However, the poor response rate (<10%) in advanced NSCLC raises questions about UFT's usefulness in the adjuvant setting, and adjuvant chemotherapy is generally not indicated for completely resected stage IA disease in Western guidelines. 1

Gastric Cancer

  • UFT has shown activity as a single agent and in combination for advanced gastric cancer. 1
  • UFT is listed among agents with demonstrated activity in advanced gastric cancer, though specific response rates and optimal combinations require further validation. 1

Dosing and Administration

Standard Regimen

  • UFT 300 mg/m²/day (in three divided doses every 8 hours) plus oral leucovorin 90-150 mg/day for 28 days, followed by a 7-day rest period. 4, 2
  • This dosing provides prolonged exposure to 5-FU with sustained plasma and tumor concentrations. 5, 2

Food Interaction - Critical Caveat

  • UFT/leucovorin should NOT be administered with food; patients should avoid food for 1 hour before and after dosing. 4
  • Food decreases CMAX and AUC of uracil and 5-FU by 37-76%, while paradoxically increasing leucovorin exposure by 14-60%. 4
  • Administration with food results in a 34% decrease in peak tegafur concentration. 4

Toxicity Profile

Favorable Safety Characteristics

  • UFT is notably well-tolerated compared to intravenous 5-FU regimens, with diarrhea as the dose-limiting toxicity. 5, 2
  • Unlike IV 5-FU, UFT is not associated with significant myelosuppression, mucositis, hand-foot syndrome, or alopecia. 2
  • Patients have decreased risk of toxicity-related hospitalization compared to IV regimens. 2
  • Grade 3/4 toxicities include diarrhea (17%) and nausea/vomiting (11%). 3

Clinical Context and Limitations

Geographic Considerations

  • UFT has been commercially available in Japan since 1983-1984 and is extensively studied in Asian populations. 5, 6
  • Western guidelines note limited experience compared to capecitabine, making it a less preferred option in Europe and North America. 1

Relative Activity

  • UFT's relative activity and safety compared to infusional 5-FU has not been definitively established in Western populations. 1
  • The convenience of oral administration and reduced toxicity provide potential pharmacoeconomic advantages over IV regimens. 2

Patient Selection

  • UFT is particularly suitable for adjuvant settings following complete tumor resection due to its mild toxicity profile. 6
  • Its direct antitumor effect may be insufficient for advanced unresectable disease requiring aggressive cytoreduction. 6

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.