What is the management approach for a splenic artery pseudoaneurysm?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Splenic Artery Pseudoaneurysm

Angioembolization should be the first-line treatment for splenic artery pseudoaneurysms when discovered, as they carry significant rupture risk and rarely resolve spontaneously, unlike post-traumatic pseudoaneurysms which may be observed in select cases. 1

Critical Distinction: Traumatic vs Non-Traumatic Pseudoaneurysms

The management approach differs fundamentally based on etiology:

Post-Traumatic Pseudoaneurysms (Pediatric and Adult)

  • Most resolve spontaneously without intervention and can be observed with serial imaging in hemodynamically stable patients 1
  • Angioembolization should be considered when pseudoaneurysm persists on pre-discharge imaging or if there are signs of persistent hemorrhage despite hemodynamic stability 1
  • Ultrasound (Doppler or contrast-enhanced) follow-up is reasonable to monitor for delayed hemorrhage 1
  • In pediatric patients, the vast majority do not require angioembolization even with moderate-to-severe injuries 1

Non-Traumatic Pseudoaneurysms (Pancreatitis, Idiopathic, Other)

  • All non-traumatic splenic artery pseudoaneurysms should be treated regardless of size due to high rupture risk 2
  • These are typically associated with chronic pancreatitis, present with bleeding or pain, and do not spontaneously resolve 3, 2
  • Average diameter at presentation is smaller than true aneurysms (1.7 cm vs 5.0 cm), yet still require intervention 2

Treatment Algorithm by Clinical Presentation

Hemodynamically Unstable Patients

  • Immediate resuscitation with blood products and urgent intervention 4
  • Angioembolization is preferred as first-line therapy with technical success rates of 67-100% 5, 6
  • Surgical intervention (splenectomy ± distal pancreatectomy) is reserved for failed endovascular therapy or when not feasible 1, 3
  • Laparoscopic approaches should not be used in acute bleeding scenarios 1

Hemodynamically Stable Patients

  • Transcatheter embolization remains the mainstay with lower complication rates than surgery 6
  • Post-procedure imaging is mandatory to confirm complete obliteration 6
  • EUS-guided coil and glue injection is an emerging alternative for pseudoaneurysms that failed angiographic embolization, with 100% success in small series 7

Special Populations Requiring Aggressive Treatment

Women of childbearing age or pregnant patients:

  • All pseudoaneurysms warrant treatment regardless of size due to catastrophic rupture risk (maternal mortality 21.9-70%, fetal mortality >90%) 5
  • Up to 50% of pregnancy-related ruptures occur in pseudoaneurysms <2 cm 5
  • Prophylactic intervention pre-conception is appropriate for known lesions 5

Liver transplant candidates:

  • Portal hypertension increases formation and rupture risk, necessitating treatment 5

Surgical Indications

  • Hemodynamic instability despite resuscitation (>40 mL/kg blood products in 24h or >4 units) 1
  • Failed angioembolization 1, 3
  • Ruptured pseudoaneurysms typically require splenectomy or splenopancreatectomy, particularly when associated with pancreatitis 3, 2
  • Splenic preservation should be attempted when feasible in non-ruptured cases 1

Post-Intervention Monitoring

  • Close monitoring for abdominal pain indicating complications such as splenic infarction or post-embolization syndrome 5
  • Post-embolization syndrome (fever, pain, ileus) occurs in up to 90% of pediatric cases but is self-limited 1
  • Repeat imaging at 4 weeks to confirm complete occlusion 7
  • For traumatic cases managed conservatively, ultrasound follow-up minimizes risk of delayed hemorrhage 1

Common Pitfalls

  • Do not assume all splenic artery pseudoaneurysms behave like post-traumatic ones - non-traumatic pseudoaneurysms require intervention regardless of size 2
  • Do not rely on size criteria alone in pregnant women - even small pseudoaneurysms can rupture catastrophically 5
  • Do not delay intervention in symptomatic patients - bleeding or pain indicates high rupture risk 4, 2
  • Ensure vaccination against encapsulated organisms if splenectomy is performed (pneumococcus, H. influenzae, meningococcus) starting ≥14 days post-operatively 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Idiopathic Splenic Artery Pseudoaneurysm Rupture as an Uncommon Cause of Hemorrhagic Shock.

Journal of investigative medicine high impact case reports, 2015

Guideline

Splenic Artery Aneurysms

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Endovascular management of splenic artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 1994

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.