Evaluation and Management of a Persistent Arm Lump Following Trauma
For a lump on your arm that has persisted for 7 months after a fall, you should undergo ultrasound imaging as the first diagnostic step, followed by MRI if the ultrasound shows concerning features or if the mass is deep-seated. 1, 2
Initial Diagnostic Approach
Ultrasound is the most appropriate first-line imaging modality for evaluating your persistent arm lump, with diagnostic accuracy of 86.87-94.1% sensitivity and 95.95-99.7% specificity for characterizing soft tissue masses. 2 This imaging should be performed within 2 weeks given the chronicity of your symptoms. 1
Key Clinical Context
The most likely diagnosis for a soft tissue mass on the arm is a benign lipoma, which represents the vast majority of limb masses seen in clinical practice. 3 However, the 7-month persistence following trauma requires systematic evaluation to exclude other etiologies, including:
- Post-traumatic hematoma organization (most common after significant trauma)
- Benign lipoma (most common soft tissue mass overall)
- Atypical lipomatous tumor (if deep-seated or >5 cm)
- Soft tissue sarcoma (rare but must be excluded)
Ultrasound Interpretation
Benign Features on Ultrasound
If your ultrasound demonstrates the following characteristics, the mass is likely benign and you can be reassured:
- Well-circumscribed, hyperechoic or isoechoic appearance compared to surrounding fat
- Thin, curved echogenic lines within an encapsulated mass
- Minimal to no internal vascularity on Doppler examination
- No acoustic shadowing
Red Flags Requiring Advanced Imaging
You should proceed directly to MRI if ultrasound reveals any of these concerning features:
- Size larger than 5 cm
- Deep location (beneath the fascia)
- Atypical ultrasound appearance
- Significant internal vascularity
- Rapid growth or change in size
- Associated pain or tenderness beyond what would be expected
When MRI is Indicated
MRI is the preferred advanced imaging modality and should be obtained if:
- The ultrasound findings are uncertain or atypical 1
- The mass is deep-seated (beneath the muscle fascia) 2
- The mass is larger than 5 cm 1, 2
- Clinical concern persists despite benign-appearing ultrasound 1
MRI can differentiate benign lipomas from atypical lipomatous tumors in up to 69% of cases and provides the most accurate characterization of extremity masses. 2, 3
Critical Pitfall to Avoid
Do not assume a post-traumatic lump is simply a resolving hematoma after 7 months. While trauma can draw attention to a pre-existing mass, the most common presentation of a soft tissue sarcoma is a painless enlarging mass, and the median size at diagnosis remains over 9 cm due to delayed recognition. 1 The 7-month timeframe makes a simple hematoma unlikely and warrants definitive imaging evaluation.
Management Algorithm
- Obtain ultrasound imaging within 2 weeks 1
- If ultrasound shows typical benign features (lipoma): Clinical follow-up is appropriate, particularly if the mass is superficial and <5 cm 2
- If ultrasound shows red flags or is uncertain: Proceed to MRI 1, 2
- If MRI suggests malignancy or atypical features: Referral to a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team for image-guided biopsy before any surgical intervention 1
Special Consideration for Deep or Lower Extremity Masses
Ultrasound is considerably less accurate for deep masses compared to superficial ones, and all deep-seated masses or those in the lower limb should raise concern for atypical lipomatous tumors, even if they appear benign on ultrasound. 2 In these cases, MRI should be obtained regardless of ultrasound appearance.