What does an MRI prostate grade 2 or 59% finding imply and what are the next steps for diagnosis and treatment?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Understanding MRI Prostate Grade 2 or 59%

What This Finding Means

An MRI prostate finding described as "grade 2" or "59%" most likely refers to a PI-RADS score of 2, which indicates a very low probability (approximately 12%) of clinically significant prostate cancer. 1

The terminology requires clarification:

  • PI-RADS 2 lesions carry approximately 12% risk of clinically significant cancer (defined as Gleason score ≥3+4 or ISUP grade group ≥2) 1
  • If "59%" refers to a percentage involvement metric, this would need correlation with the actual PI-RADS score and biopsy findings to determine significance 1

Risk Stratification Based on PI-RADS Score

The predictive value for clinically significant cancer increases stepwise with PI-RADS/Likert scores 1:

  • PI-RADS 1-2: 3-12% risk of clinically significant cancer
  • PI-RADS 3: 21% risk
  • PI-RADS 4: 58% risk
  • PI-RADS 5: 81% risk

Next Steps for Diagnosis

For a PI-RADS 2 lesion, the decision to proceed with biopsy should be guided by PSA density (PSA-D) and clinical risk factors, not by MRI findings alone. 1, 2

Biopsy Decision Algorithm

  1. Calculate PSA density (serum PSA ÷ prostate volume in cc) 1

    • PSA-D <0.10 ng/ml/cc with PI-RADS 2: Very low risk, biopsy may be deferred 1
    • PSA-D 0.10-0.15 ng/ml/cc with PI-RADS 2: Low-intermediate risk, consider clinical factors 1
    • PSA-D >0.15 ng/ml/cc with PI-RADS 2: Proceed with systematic biopsy 1
  2. If biopsy is indicated, perform standard 12-core systematic TRUS-guided biopsy 1, 2

    • Do not rely on MRI-targeted biopsy alone for PI-RADS 2 lesions 2
    • Systematic biopsy remains the standard of care even with negative or low-grade MRI findings 2
  3. Additional risk factors that lower the threshold for biopsy 1, 2:

    • Abnormal digital rectal examination
    • Family history of prostate cancer
    • African ancestry
    • Age >60 years
    • Rising PSA velocity

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

A negative or low-grade MRI (PI-RADS 1-2) does NOT exclude clinically significant prostate cancer. 2

  • Approximately 12% of men with PI-RADS 2 lesions harbor clinically significant cancer 1
  • MRI has high sensitivity (88-93%) but variable specificity (37-41%) for significant cancer 1
  • The "rule out" performance of MRI is better than its "rule in" performance, meaning negative scans are more reliable than positive scans 1
  • Never forego biopsy based solely on MRI findings when clinical suspicion remains high (elevated PSA-D, abnormal DRE, strong risk factors) 2

If Biopsy is Performed

Each biopsy core should be reported with 1:

  • Location
  • Gleason score and ISUP grade group
  • Percentage of core involvement
  • Presence of cribriform or intraductal carcinoma (high-risk features) 1

Note: ISUP grade group 2 cancers (Gleason 3+4) detected by MRI-targeted biopsy have better prognosis than those detected by systematic biopsy alone, representing a grade shift phenomenon 1

Management Based on Biopsy Results

If biopsy confirms ISUP grade group 2 (Gleason 3+4) with favorable features 1:

  • <10% Gleason pattern 4
  • PSA <10 ng/ml
  • ≤3 positive cores
  • <50% involvement per core
  • No cribriform or intraductal histology

Active surveillance may be offered with close monitoring including repeat biopsies at least every 3 years 1

If biopsy shows ISUP grade group 3 or higher, or unfavorable grade group 2 features, exclude from active surveillance and proceed with definitive treatment (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy with ADT) 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Prostate Cancer Diagnosis with MRI and Biopsy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.