Umbilical Vein Varix in the Fetus: Definition and Clinical Significance
Definition
An umbilical vein varix is defined as a focal dilatation of the umbilical vein measuring ≥9 mm in diameter or at least 50% wider than the adjacent normal umbilical vein segment. 1
There are two anatomical types:
- Intra-abdominal varix: Located within the fetal abdomen where the umbilical vein enters
- Extra-abdominal varix: Located along the umbilical cord itself 2
Clinical Significance and Risk Stratification
The clinical significance differs dramatically based on whether the varix is isolated versus associated with other abnormalities:
Isolated Intra-abdominal Umbilical Vein Varix
When the varix is truly isolated (no other structural abnormalities), the prognosis is generally excellent with good fetal outcomes expected. 1
- Prevalence is approximately 1 in 2,300 births 1
- Intrauterine growth restriction occurs in approximately 10-11% of cases 1
- Turbulent flow within the varix is seen in approximately 17% of cases 1
- No increased risk of intrauterine fetal death when isolated, with 96% of neonates having good outcomes 1
Umbilical Vein Varix with Associated Abnormalities
When additional structural anomalies are present, the risk profile changes substantially, with up to 35% having structural abnormalities and 13% experiencing preterm delivery. 3
- High association with fetal structural anomalies (35% in one series) 3
- Chromosomal abnormalities may be present, including triploidy 3
- Association with placental mesenchymal dysplasia has been reported 4
- May present with elevated maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein 4
Extra-abdominal Umbilical Vein Varix: High-Risk Variant
Extra-abdominal varices carry significantly higher risk than intra-abdominal varices, with 50% showing fetal heartbeat abnormalities and 14% resulting in fetal death. 2
- Antenatal diagnosis rate is 79% 2
- Intra-umbilical cord thrombosis occurs in 86% of cases 2
- Can cause severe fetal anemia through hemolytic mechanisms from turbulent flow 2
- May present as fetal hydrops with anemia 2
- Pathological analysis reveals focal loss of vascular smooth muscle in the umbilical vein wall 2
Management Algorithm
Initial Evaluation Upon Detection
- Perform comprehensive fetal anatomic survey to identify any associated structural abnormalities 3
- Obtain fetal echocardiogram to exclude cardiac anomalies 3
- Determine varix location (intra-abdominal versus extra-abdominal) and measure diameter 1, 2
- Assess for turbulent flow within the varix using color Doppler 1
- Rule out isoimmunization with maternal antibody screen 3
- Offer genetic counseling and consider karyotyping if other anomalies are present 3
- Evaluate for signs of fetal anemia: measure middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity 2
Surveillance Strategy
For isolated intra-abdominal varices:
- Close fetal surveillance with serial ultrasounds until delivery 1
- Monitor for development of growth restriction 1
- Assess for turbulent flow patterns 1
- Preterm delivery induction is NOT recommended based on current evidence 1
For extra-abdominal varices or those with complications:
- Intensive monitoring for fetal anemia with serial MCA-PSV measurements 2
- Watch for signs of fetal hydrops 2
- Monitor for nonreassuring fetal status 2
- Consider intrauterine transfusion if severe fetal anemia develops (MCA-PSV >2.0 MoM) 2
- Prepare for potential cesarean delivery if fetal compromise develops 2
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not assume benign prognosis without thorough evaluation for associated anomalies - 35-48% may have additional findings that significantly alter prognosis 3
- Do not overlook extra-abdominal varices - these carry substantially higher risk than intra-abdominal varices with 14% fetal mortality 2
- Do not miss fetal anemia - turbulent flow can cause hemolytic anemia requiring intrauterine transfusion 2
- Do not forget to screen the entire umbilical cord carefully during ultrasound examination when fetal anemia is suspected 2
- Do not routinely induce preterm labor for isolated intra-abdominal varices - this outdated practice is not supported by current evidence showing good outcomes with expectant management 1