What are the criteria for diagnosing ventricular tachycardia?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Criteria for Ventricular Tachycardia

Ventricular tachycardia is defined as a cardiac arrhythmia of 3 or more consecutive ventricular complexes at a rate >100 beats/min (cycle length <600 ms) that emanates from the ventricles. 1

Core Electrocardiographic Criteria

Basic Definition

  • Three or more consecutive ventricular complexes at a rate exceeding 100 beats/min is the fundamental criterion 1
  • QRS duration typically >120 ms in adults distinguishes VT from narrow-complex supraventricular rhythms 1, 2
  • In infants, VT may present with QRS <90 ms but with morphology different from sinus QRS 2

Duration-Based Classification

  • Sustained VT: Duration >30 seconds and/or requires termination due to hemodynamic compromise in <30 seconds 1
  • Nonsustained VT: Three or more consecutive beats that self-terminate in <30 seconds 1

Pathognomonic ECG Features

AV Dissociation (Most Specific)

  • Presence of AV dissociation with ventricular rate faster than atrial rate is pathognomonic for VT 1, 2, 3
  • Independent P waves continuing unrelated to QRS complexes during tachycardia strongly indicate VT 2
  • Look for irregular cannon A waves in jugular venous pulse and variability in first heart sound loudness on physical examination 1

Fusion and Capture Beats

  • Fusion beats (combination of supraventricular and ventricular complexes) are diagnostic of VT 1, 2, 3
  • These represent merger between conducted sinus impulses and ventricular depolarization 3

QRS Morphology Criteria

Precordial Lead Analysis (Brugada Criteria)

  • Absence of any R-S complexes in leads V1-V6 implies VT 1, 2, 3
  • R-S interval (onset of R wave to nadir of S wave) >100 ms in any precordial lead strongly suggests VT 1, 2, 3
  • QRS concordance (all precordial leads showing either positive or negative deflections) is diagnostic for VT 1, 2, 3

Lead aVR Analysis (Vereckei Algorithm)

  • Presence of initial R wave in lead aVR implies VT 1, 2, 3
  • Initial R or Q wave >40 ms in aVR suggests VT 1, 2, 3
  • Notch on descending limb at onset of predominantly negative QRS in aVR implies VT 1, 3

QRS Width Criteria

  • QRS width >140 ms with right bundle branch block pattern favors VT 1, 3
  • QRS width >160 ms with left bundle branch block pattern favors VT 1, 3

Lead II Analysis

  • R-wave peak time ≥50 ms in lead II suggests VT 1, 2, 3

Additional Morphological Features

  • QR complexes indicate myocardial scar and are present in approximately 40% of post-MI VT patients 1, 2
  • Similar morphology between premature ventricular beats during sinus rhythm and the tachyarrhythmia strongly suggests VT 2

Clinical Context That Strengthens VT Diagnosis

Patient History

  • Patients with prior myocardial infarction who develop wide QRS tachycardia are highly likely to have VT 1, 2
  • First occurrence of wide QRS-complex tachycardia after an infarct strongly indicates VT 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Common Diagnostic Errors

  • Never assume hemodynamic stability rules out VT - stable vital signs do not distinguish between SVT and VT 3
  • Relying solely on QRS width can be misleading when patients have pre-existing bundle branch blocks or are taking class Ia or Ic antiarrhythmic drugs 1, 2
  • Electrolyte abnormalities (especially hyperkalemia) or metabolic disorders can cause wide QRS complexes mimicking VT 1, 2
  • Pre-existing bundle branch block can make SVT appear as wide complex tachycardia 3
  • SVT with accessory pathway conduction (antidromic AVRT) can present with wide QRS 3

Management Principle

  • When the diagnosis of wide QRS-complex tachycardia is uncertain, treat as VT rather than SVT 1, 2, 3
  • Never use calcium channel blockers in undiagnosed wide complex tachycardias as they can precipitate hemodynamic collapse in VT 3

Diagnostic Approach Algorithm

  1. Confirm wide QRS complex (>120 ms) at rate >100 bpm 1, 2
  2. Search for AV dissociation or fusion beats - if present, diagnosis is VT 1, 2, 3
  3. Apply Brugada criteria: Check for absence of R-S complexes or R-S interval >100 ms in precordial leads 1, 2, 3
  4. Apply Vereckei algorithm: Examine lead aVR for initial R wave, Q wave >40 ms, or notching 1, 2, 3
  5. Check for QRS concordance in precordial leads 1, 2, 3
  6. Assess QRS width: >140 ms (RBBB) or >160 ms (LBBB) favors VT 1, 3
  7. Consider clinical context: Prior MI strongly suggests VT 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnosing Ventricular Tachycardia

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Differentiating SVT from VT

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.