What is the treatment for upper back pain with radiation down the left arm using steroid treatment, such as prednisone (corticosteroid)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Upper Back Pain with Radiation Down Left Arm: Steroid Treatment

Direct Recommendation

Do not use systemic corticosteroids (such as oral prednisone) for chronic upper back pain with radiation down the left arm, as there is no high-certainty evidence of meaningful benefit and these interventions are not recommended for chronic spine pain. 1

Critical First Step: Rule Out Red Flags

Before considering any treatment, immediately evaluate for serious underlying conditions that require urgent intervention:

  • Spinal cord compression: Look for progressive weakness, sensory loss, or sphincter dysfunction—this is a medical emergency requiring immediate MRI and high-dose dexamethasone (16-96 mg/day) 1
  • Metastatic disease: History of cancer (especially breast, lung, prostate) warrants urgent MRI of entire spine 1, 2
  • Infection or inflammatory arthropathy: Fever, night sweats, unexplained weight loss, or known inflammatory conditions 1

If any red flags are present, obtain MRI immediately before considering steroids, as the treatment approach differs fundamentally 3, 2

Evidence Against Steroid Interventions for Chronic Spine Pain

The most recent and highest-quality evidence—a 2025 BMJ clinical practice guideline—provides strong recommendations against all steroid-based interventions for chronic spine pain (≥3 months duration):

  • Epidural injections of steroids (with or without local anesthetic): Moderate-certainty evidence shows these probably have little to no effect on pain relief for both chronic axial and radicular spine pain 1
  • Joint-targeted steroid injections: Similarly ineffective with moderate-certainty evidence 1
  • Intramuscular steroid injections: Low-certainty evidence suggests no benefit 1

The guideline panel found no high-certainty evidence of important pain relief for any interventional procedure, including all steroid-based treatments 1

Systemic Oral Corticosteroids: Limited Role

For radicular pain specifically (pain radiating down the arm from nerve root irritation), systemic oral corticosteroids show only marginal benefit:

  • Short-term pain improvement: Moderate-certainty evidence indicates corticosteroids probably provide a clinically insignificant 0.56-point reduction on a 0-10 pain scale 4
  • Function: May slightly improve short-term function (19% absolute improvement in likelihood of functional improvement), but this is modest 4
  • Duration: Effects are limited to short-term follow-up only 4

For non-radicular pain (axial upper back pain without clear nerve root involvement), systemic corticosteroids may actually be associated with slightly worse outcomes 4

Serious Harms to Consider

While a single dose or short course appears relatively safe, serious adverse events have been documented:

  • Between 1997-2014, the FDA captured 90 serious adverse events from epidural corticosteroid injections, including death, spinal cord infarction, paraplegia, stroke, and seizures 1
  • Oral corticosteroids carry risks of gastric irritation, HPA axis suppression (lasting 3 weeks), hyperglycemia, osteoporosis, psychiatric disturbances, and infection risk 5, 6
  • High-dose dexamethasone (96 mg/day) used for spinal cord compression has 29% side effect rate with 14% serious complications including GI perforation 1

When Steroids ARE Indicated

Systemic corticosteroids have a clear role only in specific emergency situations:

Spinal Cord Compression (Emergency)

  • Immediate dexamethasone 16 mg/day (moderate dose preferred over high-dose due to toxicity concerns) if clinical-radiological diagnosis of cord compression is confirmed 1
  • Administer before radiographic confirmation if high clinical suspicion, then de-escalate if MRI negative 1
  • Taper over 2 weeks 1

Acute Radiculopathy (Not Chronic)

  • Patients with acute symptoms (not chronic ≥3 months) may have better response to epidural steroids compared to chronic symptoms 6
  • However, even for acute radiculopathy, the 2025 BMJ guideline recommends against routine steroid interventions 1

Recommended Approach for Chronic Upper Back Pain with Radiation

Instead of steroids, the evidence supports:

  1. Conservative management: Physical therapy, activity modification, and appropriate analgesia (non-opioid when possible) 1
  2. Avoid routine imaging unless red flags present or symptoms persist beyond 6 weeks despite conservative treatment 3
  3. Multidisciplinary assessment if symptoms are severe or persistent, but not interventional procedures 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not administer steroids for chronic spine pain based on older guidelines or practice patterns—the 2025 BMJ guideline represents the most comprehensive evidence synthesis to date 1
  • Do not assume imaging findings correlate with symptoms—disc abnormalities are common in asymptomatic individuals 3
  • Do not use high-dose dexamethasone (96 mg/day) outside of confirmed spinal cord compression due to significant toxicity 1
  • Do not abruptly discontinue corticosteroids if already started—taper gradually to avoid withdrawal syndrome and adrenal insufficiency 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach for Severe Low Back Pain with Neurological Symptoms

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Imaging for Onset of Low Back Pain

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Systemic corticosteroids for radicular and non-radicular low back pain.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.