What medications are used to treat chronic hepatitis B?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Medications to Treat Chronic Hepatitis B

First-Line Treatment Recommendation

For chronic hepatitis B, initiate treatment with entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) as first-line monotherapy—these are the only recommended options due to their superior potency and high genetic barriers to resistance. 1, 2

Preferred First-Line Agents

Nucleos(t)ide Analogues with High Genetic Barrier

  • Entecavir: Highly potent oral agent with virologic response rates exceeding 90% after 3 years of treatment 1, 3, 4
  • Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF): Equally potent with similar efficacy to entecavir, achieving 90-96% virologic suppression 1, 5
  • Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF): Newer formulation with equivalent efficacy to TDF but improved renal and bone safety profile—particularly important for patients at risk of renal dysfunction or metabolic bone disease 1, 2, 6
  • Besifovir: Approved in Korea as first-line therapy with similar efficacy to TDF and favorable renal/bone safety, though clinical data remain more limited 1

Peginterferon Alfa

  • Peginterferon alfa-2a: Can be used as first-line therapy with the advantage of finite treatment duration (48-52 weeks) and higher rates of HBsAg loss compared to nucleos(t)ide analogues 1
  • Achieves HBeAg seroconversion in 32-41% of HBeAg-positive patients at 6 months post-treatment 1
  • Major limitations: Subcutaneous administration, significant side effects, and absolutely contraindicated in decompensated cirrhosis due to risk of liver failure 1

Agents to Avoid as First-Line Therapy

Do not use lamivudine, adefovir, telbivudine, or clevudine as first-line treatment due to inferior efficacy and high resistance rates 1, 2:

  • Lamivudine: Resistance rates up to 70% over 5 years 2
  • Adefovir: Inferior efficacy and resistance profile compared to tenofovir 1
  • Telbivudine: High resistance rates despite potent initial activity 1, 2
  • Clevudine: Not recommended due to viral resistance concerns 1

Treatment Selection Algorithm

For Treatment-Naïve Patients

Choose between entecavir, TDF, or TAF based on the following considerations 1, 2:

  1. If renal dysfunction or bone disease risk exists: Prefer TAF or entecavir over TDF 1, 2, 6
  2. If cost is a primary concern: TDF may be more cost-effective than entecavir in some healthcare systems 7
  3. If finite treatment duration is desired and liver function is well-preserved: Consider peginterferon alfa-2a, particularly in HBeAg-positive patients with genotype A 1

For Lamivudine-Experienced Patients

Never use entecavir in patients with any history of lamivudine exposure—archived lamivudine-resistant mutations in HBV cccDNA serve as foundation for entecavir resistance 1, 2

Use tenofovir (TDF or TAF) instead 2

For Patients with Cirrhosis

  • Compensated cirrhosis: Use nucleos(t)ide analogues with high genetic barrier (entecavir, TDF, or TAF); peginterferon may be considered with careful monitoring if liver function well-preserved 1
  • Decompensated cirrhosis: Immediately initiate nucleos(t)ide analogue monotherapy (entecavir, TDF, or TAF) regardless of HBV DNA level; peginterferon is absolutely contraindicated 1, 2

Treatment Indications by Clinical Scenario

HBeAg-Positive Patients

Initiate treatment when HBV DNA >20,000 IU/mL AND ALT >2× upper limit of normal (ULN) 1, 2

HBeAg-Negative Patients

Initiate treatment when HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL AND ALT elevated 1, 2

Patients with Compensated Cirrhosis

Treat if HBV DNA ≥2,000 IU/mL, regardless of ALT level 2

Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis

Immediately treat all patients with detectable HBV DNA, regardless of viral load, HBeAg status, or ALT level 2

Treatment Duration

HBeAg-Positive Patients

Continue nucleos(t)ide analogue for minimum 1 year, then 3-6 months after confirmed HBeAg seroconversion 1, 2

HBeAg-Negative Patients

Long-term or indefinite treatment is typically required—relapse rates reach 80-90% if treatment stopped within 1-2 years 1, 2

Patients with Cirrhosis

Indefinite nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment is recommended 1

Peginterferon Alfa

Finite treatment duration of 48-52 weeks 1

Monitoring During Treatment

  • HBV DNA and ALT: Every 3-6 months 2
  • HBeAg status: Regularly in HBeAg-positive patients 2
  • Renal function: Particularly with TDF 2, 5
  • Bone density: Consider monitoring in patients on TDF with risk factors 2

Treatment Goals and Expected Outcomes

Primary Goal

Sustained suppression of HBV DNA to undetectable levels to prevent progression to cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver-related mortality 1, 2

Virologic Response Rates

  • Entecavir and TDF: Achieve >90% virologic response after 3 years in treatment-adherent patients 1, 3, 4, 8
  • TAF: Achieves 96.7-100% virologic response rates 1

HBsAg Loss (Ideal Endpoint)

  • Nucleos(t)ide analogues: 3.4-4.9% HBsAg loss after 10 years of tenofovir treatment 1
  • Peginterferon alfa: 2-7% HBsAg loss at 1 year post-treatment, increasing to 12% at 5 years 1

Critical Safety Warnings

Post-Treatment Hepatitis Exacerbation

Severe acute exacerbations of hepatitis can occur after discontinuing anti-HBV therapy—monitor hepatic function closely with clinical and laboratory follow-up for at least several months after stopping treatment 5

Decompensated Cirrhosis

Peginterferon alfa is absolutely contraindicated due to risk of precipitating liver failure 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Hepatitis B Treatment Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Efficacy and safety of entecavir versus tenofovir treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients: A randomized controlled trial.

Hepatology research : the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology, 2017

Research

Long-term safety and efficacy of nucleo(t)side analogue therapy in hepatitis B.

Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver, 2018

Research

Comparison of the efficacy of tenofovir and entecavir for the treatment of nucleos(t)ide-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B.

The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology, 2012

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.