What does tissue transglutaminase (tTG) Immunoglobulin A (IgA) tell you?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

What Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Tells You

Tissue transglutaminase IgA (tTG-IgA) is the primary screening test for celiac disease, indicating the presence of autoantibodies against tissue transglutaminase-2, the major autoantigen in celiac disease. 1, 2

Diagnostic Significance

  • tTG-IgA has high sensitivity (90-96% in adults, 97.7% in children) and specificity (87.4% in adults at 15 U/mL threshold, 70.2% in children at 20 U/mL threshold) for detecting celiac disease 3, 2

  • The test performs better at ruling out celiac disease than ruling it in, due to specificity being lower than sensitivity 3

  • A positive tTG-IgA result strongly suggests celiac disease, particularly when levels exceed 10× the upper limit of normal, which correlates with severe intestinal damage and high likelihood of significant villous atrophy 3

  • The concordance rate between tTG-IgA and endomysial antibodies (EMA) is approximately 95-100% in untreated celiac disease 1, 4, 5

Clinical Context Required

  • Testing must be performed while the patient is on a gluten-containing diet to avoid false negative results 1, 3, 2

  • Total IgA levels must be measured concurrently, as IgA deficiency (occurring in 1-3% of celiac disease patients) causes falsely low tTG-IgA results 3, 2

  • If IgA deficiency is present, IgG-based assays (IgG deamidated gliadin peptide or IgG tTG) should be used instead 3

Interpretation Algorithm

For positive tTG-IgA results:

  • Confirm with endomysial antibody (EMA) testing, which has higher specificity (99.6% in adults, 93.8% in children) and helps rule in celiac disease 1, 3

  • Proceed to upper endoscopy with small bowel biopsy (at least 6 specimens from second part of duodenum) as the gold standard for diagnosis 1, 3, 2

  • HLA-DQ2/DQ8 testing has limited diagnostic value and is primarily useful for its negative predictive value to rule out celiac disease 1, 3

For discordant results (positive tTG-IgA, negative EMA):

  • This may represent early or developing celiac disease 3

  • Upper endoscopy with biopsy remains necessary to establish diagnosis 3

Monitoring Treatment Response

  • tTG-IgA levels typically decline within months of starting a gluten-free diet, with most significant drops occurring in the first year 3, 6

  • Follow-up testing schedule: at 6 months after starting gluten-free diet, at 12 months, then annually 3

  • Persistently elevated tTG-IgA levels despite dietary treatment suggest ongoing gluten exposure or poor dietary compliance 3, 6

  • Different tTG-IgA assays have varying sensitivity for detecting suboptimal treatment response—chemiluminescence immunoassays (CLIA) appear more sensitive than fluorochrome-enzyme immunoassays (FEIA) in detecting ongoing intestinal damage 7

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never start a gluten-free diet before completing diagnostic workup, as this leads to false negative serology and inconclusive biopsies 3

  • Do not rely solely on serology without biopsy confirmation, especially with discordant results 3

  • Be aware of significant interlaboratory variability in absolute tTG-IgA values (median 50% variability), though qualitative interpretation (positive vs. negative) shows good agreement 8

  • In patients on gluten-free diet, switching between different tTG-IgA assays can produce discrepant results due to varying sensitivity thresholds 7

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Celiac Disease Diagnosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Evaluating Discordant Celiac Disease Test Results

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Celiac Disease Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.