Does hypertension and being 55 years old count as additional cardiac risk factors for adding Vascepa (icosapent ethyl) to a treatment regimen for a patient with diabetes mellitus (DM)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Does Hypertension and Age 55 Qualify as Additional Cardiac Risk Factors for Vascepa in a Diabetic Patient?

Yes, hypertension alone qualifies as an additional cardiovascular risk factor that, combined with diabetes mellitus, meets the criteria for Vascepa (icosapent ethyl) therapy in patients with elevated triglycerides on statin treatment.

Understanding Vascepa Indication Criteria

The REDUCE-IT trial, which established Vascepa's cardiovascular benefit, enrolled patients with either:

  • Established cardiovascular disease (secondary prevention), OR
  • Diabetes mellitus PLUS at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor (primary prevention) 1

Hypertension definitively counts as an additional cardiovascular risk factor in diabetic patients for Vascepa consideration 1. The presence of hypertension in your 55-year-old diabetic patient satisfies the "diabetes plus one additional risk factor" criterion.

Recognized Additional Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Beyond hypertension, other qualifying risk factors include 2:

  • Age ≥55 years in men (your patient meets this threshold)
  • Age ≥65 years in women
  • Smoking (current or recent)
  • Dyslipidemia (LDL ≥100 mg/dL despite statin therapy)
  • Chronic kidney disease (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m²)
  • Albuminuria (≥30 μg albumin/mg creatinine)
  • Family history of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
  • Retinopathy or neuropathy

Your Patient's Specific Situation

Your 55-year-old male patient with diabetes and hypertension meets criteria through two pathways:

  1. Hypertension as the additional risk factor: This alone, combined with diabetes, qualifies him for Vascepa if triglycerides remain 135-499 mg/dL on statin therapy 1

  2. Age ≥55 years: Being 55 years old is itself recognized as an additional cardiovascular risk factor in diabetic men 2

Complete Eligibility Requirements for Vascepa

To prescribe Vascepa for cardiovascular risk reduction, your patient must meet ALL of the following 1:

  • Diabetes mellitus (which he has) ✓
  • At least one additional cardiovascular risk factor (hypertension and/or age ≥55) ✓
  • Elevated triglycerides 135-499 mg/dL (verify this level)
  • Already on statin therapy (confirm he's taking a statin)
  • Controlled LDL cholesterol (typically 40-100 mg/dL on statin)

Clinical Evidence Supporting Use

The REDUCE-IT trial demonstrated that icosapent ethyl 4 g daily reduced the primary composite cardiovascular endpoint by 25% in high-risk patients 1. Women with diabetes showed particularly robust responses, with 21.5% triglyceride reduction and improvements in multiple atherogenic lipid parameters without increasing LDL cholesterol 3.

Importantly, benefits were consistent across all kidney function categories, with patients having eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m² showing the largest absolute risk reduction (primary endpoint: 21.8% vs 28.9% placebo; HR 0.71, P=0.0002) 1.

Common Pitfall to Avoid

Do not wait for additional risk factors to accumulate. Hypertension alone is sufficient when combined with diabetes. The presence of age ≥55 years provides additional justification but is not required when hypertension is already present 2, 1.

Safety Monitoring Considerations

While prescribing Vascepa, monitor for 1:

  • Atrial fibrillation/flutter: Increased risk, particularly in patients with reduced kidney function (4.2% vs 3.0% placebo in eGFR <60 group)
  • Bleeding events: Slightly elevated risk (5.4% vs 3.6% placebo in eGFR <60 group), though hazard ratios were similar across all eGFR categories
  • These risks did not outweigh cardiovascular benefits in the trial population

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.