What are the primary performance indicators for an Emergency Department (ED)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Primary Performance Indicators for Emergency Departments

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services mandates five core ED performance measures that hospitals must report: median time from ED arrival to departure for discharged patients, door-to-diagnostic evaluation by a qualified medical professional, patients who leave before being seen (LWBS), median time from ED arrival to departure for admitted patients, and median time from admit decision to departure for admitted patients. 1

Regulatory-Mandated Core Metrics

The Joint Commission and CMS have established these indicators as patient safety issues, particularly recognizing that ED crowding directly impacts quality of care across multiple domains including safety, timeliness, efficiency, and equitability 1. These measures became mandatory reporting requirements in 2014 1.

Time-Based Performance Indicators

Primary time metrics include:

  • Time to Provider (TTP): Duration from ED arrival to initial evaluation by a qualified medical professional 2, 3
  • Time to Disposition (TTD): Interval from ED arrival to final disposition decision (admit, discharge, or transfer) 2, 3
  • Length of Stay (LOS): Total time from ED arrival to physical departure, measured separately for:
    • Discharged patients 1
    • Admitted patients (including boarding time) 1
  • Door-to-admit decision time: Time from arrival to the decision to admit 1
  • Admit decision to departure time: Boarding interval after admission decision 1

Access and Flow Indicators

Left Without Being Seen (LWBS) rate is a critical quality metric reflecting both access barriers and patient safety concerns 1, 3. This proportion-based measure indicates patients who departed before medical evaluation and correlates strongly with ED crowding 1.

Patient elopement rates beyond LWBS (patients who leave after initial contact but before treatment completion) represent additional access failures 1.

Disease-Specific Time Targets

STEMI Performance Measures

For ST-elevation myocardial infarction, specific time benchmarks exist 1:

  • Door-to-balloon time ≤90 minutes for primary PCI at PCI-capable facilities 1
  • Door-to-fibrinolytic time ≤30 minutes at non-PCI-capable facilities when transfer time exceeds 120 minutes 1
  • Door-to-ECG time: Should be performed immediately upon arrival 1
  • ED arrival to ED departure time for transferred STEMI patients 1

Quality and Safety Indicators

Medication errors correlate directly with ED crowding levels, making error rates an important performance indicator 1. Studies demonstrate associations between crowding and preventable medical errors across both adult and pediatric populations 1.

Timeliness of critical interventions includes 1:

  • Time to analgesic administration (particularly for pain crises and acute abdominal pain)
  • Time to antibiotic administration for conditions like community-acquired pneumonia
  • Delays in these interventions are associated with ED crowding and represent quality deficits

Patient-Centered Outcomes

Patient satisfaction serves as a quality indicator, though it requires careful analysis beyond simple scores 4. Satisfaction correlates with perceived wait times (which differ from actual wait times), staff communication quality, and understanding of care processes 5.

Cost metrics have been linked to ED crowding in large-scale studies, making efficiency measures relevant performance indicators 1.

Operational Definitions

A 2011 consensus summit of emergency medicine experts established standardized definitions for ED operational metrics, aligning with CMS, Emergency Nurses Association, and National Quality Forum standards 2. These definitions ensure consistent measurement across institutions.

Common Pitfalls in Performance Measurement

Avoid measuring only individual metrics in isolation 6. A 2020 scoping review identified 202 individual ED performance indicators, but comprehensive assessment requires examining outcomes across five domains: time, proportion, process, cost, and clinical outcomes 6.

Heterogeneity in measurement methods creates challenges 6. Performance measurement involves both automated information technology mechanisms and manual data collection, reflecting the multifaceted nature of ED care 6.

Context matters for intervention effectiveness 3. Meta-analysis shows that strategies like point-of-care testing and triage liaison physicians reduce time metrics, but effectiveness varies by practice environment and must be tailored appropriately 3.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Interventions to improve emergency department throughput and care delivery indicators: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2024

Research

Patient satisfaction data as a quality indicator: a tale of two emergency departments.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2003

Research

Strategies to measure and improve emergency department performance: a scoping review.

Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2020

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.