Polymyxin-Aztreonam Synergy for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections
Direct Recommendation
For severe infections caused by metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), use ceftazidime-avibactam 2.5 g IV every 8 hours (as a 3-hour prolonged infusion) PLUS aztreonam 2 g IV every 6 hours, NOT polymyxin-aztreonam combinations. 1, 2
Treatment Algorithm Based on Pathogen Type
For MBL-Producing CRE (NDM, VIM, IMP)
Preferred regimen: Ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam demonstrates 30-day mortality of 19.2% versus 44% with alternative regimens including colistin-based therapies. 1
Do NOT use polymyxin-aztreonam for MBL-producers when ceftazidime-avibactam is available, as the ceftazidime-avibactam/aztreonam combination shows superior outcomes compared to colistin-containing regimens. 1, 2
The Italian Society of Infection and Tropical Diseases provides a STRONG recommendation with MODERATE certainty of evidence for ceftazidime-avibactam/aztreonam over polymyxin-based regimens. 1
For Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA)
When treating severe CRPA infections with polymyxins, aminoglycosides, or fosfomycin, use two in vitro active drugs in combination (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence). 3
Polymyxin-aztreonam synergy is mechanistically sound: colistin disrupts the bacterial cell envelope initially (1 hour), while aztreonam inhibits cell wall biosynthesis at later time points (4-24 hours), creating time-dependent synergistic killing. 4
In critically ill patients with XDR-P. aeruginosa, mortality was significantly lower with polymyxin combinations (0/3 deaths) versus polymyxin monotherapy (14/15 deaths). 3
For Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB)
Polymyxin-based therapy remains the backbone for CRAB when sulbactam resistance exists. 3
Colistin-aztreonam combination demonstrates synergistic bactericidal activity through complementary mechanisms: colistin causes immediate cell envelope disruption while aztreonam provides sustained cell wall synthesis inhibition. 4
Dosing Specifications
Polymyxin B Dosing
Standard dosing: 15,000-25,000 units/kg/day divided every 12 hours (infused over 30 minutes). 5
Polymyxin B demonstrates rapid bactericidal activity with serum clearance directly proportional to creatinine clearance, requiring dose adjustment in renal impairment. 6, 7
Aztreonam Dosing
Prolonged infusion strategy: 2 g IV every 6 hours infused over 4 hours achieves superior pharmacodynamic targets, maintaining concentrations above MIC for >40% of the dosing interval. 5
Aztreonam clearance in critically ill patients (2.3 mL/kg/min) significantly exceeds adult reference values (1.3 mL/kg/min), potentially requiring higher or more frequent dosing. 5
Duration of Therapy
Most severe infections: 7-14 days minimum, continuing at least 48 hours after clinical improvement or bacterial eradication. 8
Bone/musculoskeletal infections: 4-6 weeks minimum. 2
Respiratory tract infections: Mean duration 19 days (range 2-57 days) in critically ill patients. 9
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Never Use Aztreonam Monotherapy
- Aztreonam monotherapy will fail for MBL-producing organisms because these bacteria co-produce ESBLs and cephalosporinases that inactivate aztreonam, despite aztreonam's stability against metallo-β-lactamases. 1
Resistance Emergence
Ceftazidime-avibactam resistance develops in 3.8-10.4% of patients during treatment of KPC-producing CRE. 2
Obtain repeat cultures if clinical deterioration occurs within 48-72 hours to assess for resistance development. 2
Nephrotoxicity Monitoring
Polymyxin B causes nephrotoxicity in approximately 10% of patients, though this rarely requires discontinuation. 9
Colistin demonstrates higher nephrotoxicity than polymyxin B (adjusted HR 2.27,95% CI 1.35-3.82) in critically ill patients. 3
When Polymyxin-Aztreonam Is Appropriate
Use polymyxin-aztreonam combinations only when:
Ceftazidime-avibactam is unavailable or the organism is resistant to it. 1, 2
Treating CRPA or CRAB infections where alternative agents lack activity. 3
Antimicrobial synergy testing demonstrates synergistic activity and treatment options are severely limited. 3
Synergy Testing Considerations
Antimicrobial synergy testing may guide combination selection when drug choices are limited or conventional susceptibility testing shows no effective options. 3
Checkerboard method is preferred, followed by disc elution method or MIC strip crossing/stacking methods, all demonstrating 100% sensitivity and specificity for detecting synergy. 3
Important caveat: One study showed in vitro synergism between colistin and meropenem did not translate into clinical benefit, highlighting the limitations of synergy testing. 3