Sensitivity and Specificity of MPI for CAD
Myocardial perfusion imaging demonstrates a sensitivity of 82-91% and specificity of 70-90% for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease, with pharmacological stress slightly outperforming exercise stress. 1
Diagnostic Performance by Stress Modality
Exercise Stress Nuclear MPI
Pharmacological Stress Nuclear MPI
- Sensitivity: 88-91% 1
- Specificity: 75-90% 1
- Pharmacological stress achieves higher sensitivity and specificity compared to exercise stress, making it preferable for patients with limited exercise capacity 1
Performance in Specific Populations
Women
- Technetium-99m agents with gated SPECT achieve sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 91% after bias correction 1
- This represents substantial improvement over thallium-201 imaging, which had specificity of only 67% due to breast tissue attenuation 1
- Vasodilator stress with Tc-99m sestamibi demonstrates sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 86% for detecting significant stenoses 1
Diabetic Patients
- SPECT MPI shows sensitivity of 87-89% and specificity of 73-75% for detecting angiographically significant CAD in diabetic populations 1
Important Performance Caveats
Lower Accuracy in Meta-Analysis
- A large meta-analysis of 114 SPECT studies revealed considerably lower pooled performance: sensitivity 78% and specificity only 52%, though negative predictive value remained high at 83% 1
- This discrepancy reflects real-world heterogeneity in patient populations, technical factors, and referral bias 1
Technical Limitations
- Balanced ischemia: Global perfusion reduction in left main or three-vessel disease can appear falsely normal, underestimating ischemic burden 1
- Breast tissue artifact: Affects image quality in women and men with large breasts, though Tc-99m agents and attenuation correction reduce this problem 1
- Obesity: Degrades diagnostic image quality, though PET maintains higher accuracy in obese patients 1
PET vs SPECT Performance
PET myocardial perfusion imaging achieves slightly higher sensitivity than SPECT, particularly in women and obese patients, due to superior spatial resolution and photon attenuation correction 1
Hybrid Imaging Enhancement
Combining SPECT with coronary CT angiography dramatically improves diagnostic accuracy to sensitivity 96% and specificity 95%, compared to SPECT alone (93% sensitivity, 79% specificity) or CCTA alone (98% sensitivity, 62% specificity) 1
Prognostic Value
- Normal stress SPECT predicts excellent outcomes: annual cardiac event rate of only 1% in patients with intermediate to high pretest probability of CAD 1
- Abnormal perfusion studies stratify risk proportionally to defect extent and severity, with three-year survival declining from 99% (no ischemia) to 85% (three-vessel territory ischemia) 1