What is the recommended antibiotic regimen for a patient with a wound culture showing numerous Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Enterococcus faecalis, previously treated with Avycaz (Ceftazidime/Avibactam) and Flagyl (Metronidazole) for a wound culture growing Klebsiella and Carbapenem-Resistant Organism (CRO)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Antibiotic Management for Polymicrobial Wound Infection with MRSA and Enterococcus faecalis

For this wound infection with numerous MRSA and Enterococcus faecalis, you should initiate vancomycin plus ampicillin (or piperacillin-tazobactam as a single agent alternative) to provide targeted coverage for both pathogens. 1

Rationale for Dual Pathogen Coverage

This patient's wound culture represents a healthcare-associated polymicrobial infection requiring coverage for both MRSA and enterococci, given:

  • Prior broad-spectrum antibiotic exposure (Avycaz and Flagyl) selects for resistant organisms including enterococci 1
  • Healthcare-associated infection context with previous hospitalization and antibiotic therapy mandates empiric anti-enterococcal coverage 1
  • MRSA isolation requires specific anti-MRSA therapy 1

Recommended Antibiotic Regimens

First-Line Option: Combination Therapy

  • Vancomycin for MRSA coverage (dose: 15-20 mg/kg IV every 8-12 hours, target trough 15-20 mcg/mL) 1
  • Plus ampicillin for Enterococcus faecalis (dose: 2 g IV every 4-6 hours) 1

This combination provides targeted coverage based on the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for healthcare-associated infections with documented MRSA and enterococci 1.

Alternative Single-Agent Option

  • Piperacillin-tazobactam (3.375 g IV every 6 hours or 4.5 g IV every 8 hours) provides coverage for both MRSA (limited) and Enterococcus faecalis 1

However, piperacillin-tazobactam has variable activity against MRSA and should only be used if susceptibility testing confirms coverage 1.

Second-Line Options for MRSA (if vancomycin contraindicated)

  • Linezolid 600 mg IV/PO every 12 hours - effective against both MRSA and Enterococcus faecalis 1, 2, 3, 4
  • Daptomycin 6-10 mg/kg IV once daily for MRSA (note: requires additional agent for enterococcal coverage) 1, 2, 5

Why Enterococcal Coverage is Critical

Empiric anti-enterococcal therapy is specifically recommended for patients with:

  • Healthcare-associated intra-abdominal or wound infections 1
  • Postoperative infections 1
  • Previous cephalosporin or broad-spectrum antibiotic exposure (this patient received Avycaz) 1
  • Documented enterococcal isolation from cultures 1

The Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines emphasize that antimicrobial therapy for enterococci should be given when recovered from healthcare-associated infections 1.

Enterococcus faecalis Specific Considerations

Initial empiric therapy should target E. faecalis specifically (not E. faecium), as this is the isolated organism 1. Appropriate antibiotics based on susceptibility include:

  • Ampicillin (first choice) 1
  • Piperacillin-tazobactam 1
  • Vancomycin (if ampicillin-resistant) 1

Research confirms that vancomycin, linezolid, teicoplanin, and nitrofurantoin show the lowest resistance rates against E. faecalis isolates from hospitalized patients 4.

MRSA Coverage Requirements

Vancomycin remains the recommended first-line agent for suspected or proven intra-abdominal or wound infection due to MRSA 1. The Infectious Diseases Society of America specifically recommends vancomycin for:

  • Healthcare-associated infections with known MRSA colonization 1
  • Patients at risk due to prior treatment failure and significant antibiotic exposure (this patient) 1
  • Documented MRSA from wound cultures 1

Alternative anti-MRSA agents include linezolid, daptomycin, and ceftaroline, with linezolid showing superior clinical cure rates in some studies (OR 1.40,95% CI 1.01-1.95 for skin and soft tissue infections) 1.

Treatment Duration and Monitoring

Continue antibiotic therapy based on infection severity:

  • Moderate infections: 2-4 weeks typically sufficient, depending on structures involved and adequacy of debridement 1
  • Severe infections with deep tissue involvement: May require 4-6 weeks 1
  • Adjust duration based on clinical response, adequacy of source control, and wound vascularity 1

Critical Adjunctive Measures

Antibiotic therapy alone is insufficient - optimal wound care is crucial for healing 1:

  • Proper wound cleansing and debridement of necrotic tissue 1
  • Surgical consultation for deep abscess, extensive tissue involvement, or necrotizing infection 1
  • Pressure off-loading for diabetic foot wounds 1

Tailoring Therapy Based on Susceptibilities

Once final susceptibility results are available:

  • De-escalate to narrower spectrum agents if possible 1
  • If E. faecalis is ampicillin-susceptible, continue ampicillin and discontinue vancomycin (keeping vancomycin only for MRSA) 1
  • If MRSA shows vancomycin MIC >1.5 mcg/mL, consider alternative agents like daptomycin or linezolid 5

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not use ceftazidime/avibactam (Avycaz) or metronidazole (Flagyl) for this infection - these agents lack activity against MRSA and enterococci, explaining the treatment failure 1.

Do not rely on single-agent therapy without confirmed susceptibilities - the polymicrobial nature with resistant organisms requires dual coverage until susceptibilities confirm single-agent adequacy 1.

Do not delay surgical evaluation - if clinical improvement does not occur within 48-72 hours despite appropriate antibiotics, surgical debridement or drainage may be necessary 1.

Monitor for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) - empiric VRE coverage is not recommended unless the patient is at very high risk (e.g., liver transplant recipient, known VRE colonization) 1.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Antibiotics Effective Against Staphylococcus aureus

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Antibiotic Resistance in Enterococcus faecalis Isolated from Hospitalized Patients.

Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects, 2013

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.