Can polymyxin (Polymyxin B) plus aztreonam be used to treat Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Polymyxin Plus Aztreonam for CRE Infections

Polymyxin plus aztreonam is NOT the recommended combination for CRE infections—you should use ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam instead, which demonstrates significantly superior mortality outcomes (19.2% vs 44% 30-day mortality) compared to polymyxin-based regimens. 1

Why This Combination Is Suboptimal

The question asks about polymyxin plus aztreonam, but this is not a guideline-recommended regimen for CRE. The evidence consistently supports different combinations:

For Metallo-β-Lactamase (MBL)-Producing CRE (NDM, VIM, IMP):

Use ceftazidime-avibactam 2.5g IV every 8 hours PLUS aztreonam 2g IV every 6 hours as the preferred regimen. 2, 3, 4

  • This combination achieved 19.2% 30-day mortality versus 44% with other active antimicrobials (including polymyxin-based therapies) in a propensity-score-adjusted study of 102 patients with MBL-producing CRE bacteremia. 1
  • The hazard ratio for 30-day mortality was 0.37 (95% CI 0.13-0.74), representing a 63% reduction in mortality risk. 1
  • Clinical failure rates and length of hospital stay were also significantly reduced with this combination. 1

For KPC-Producing or OXA-48-Producing CRE:

Use ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy at 2.5g IV every 8 hours as a prolonged 3-hour infusion. 4

  • Nearly 100% of KPC and OXA-48 producers are susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam alone. 4
  • Adding aztreonam provides no mortality benefit for non-MBL producers. 1

Why Polymyxin-Based Regimens Are Inferior

Multiple recent studies demonstrate that ceftazidime-avibactam-based therapy (with or without aztreonam) outperforms polymyxin-based combinations:

  • Mortality advantage: Ceftazidime-avibactam-based therapy was 66% less likely to be associated with day 14 mortality (p=0.048) and 67% less likely to be associated with day 28 mortality (p=0.039) compared to polymyxin-based therapy. 5
  • Reduced nephrotoxicity: Polymyxin-based regimens had significantly higher incidence of nephrotoxicity (p=0.017). 5
  • Better clinical response: In a Cox multivariate regression analysis, ceftazidime-avibactam with or without aztreonam showed significantly better clinical response at day 14 (HR=0.78,95% CI 0.63-0.95, p=0.018) compared to polymyxins. 6
  • Improved survival in high-prevalence NDM settings: In a South Indian cohort with high NDM prevalence, ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam demonstrated 30-day mortality of 29.2% versus 56.9% with polymyxins (p=0.005), with hazard ratio of 2.02 for polymyxin use. 7

Mechanism Rationale

Aztreonam is uniquely stable against metallo-β-lactamases because MBLs cannot hydrolyze this monobactam antibiotic. 2, 3 However, aztreonam cannot be used as monotherapy because MBL-producing organisms co-produce other β-lactamases (ESBLs and cephalosporinases) that inactivate aztreonam. 3

Ceftazidime-avibactam protects aztreonam from these co-produced β-lactamases, restoring aztreonam susceptibility and creating synergistic activity in 90-100% of MBL-producing strains. 4, 8

Polymyxin does not provide this protective mechanism for aztreonam, making the combination mechanistically inferior. 8

Critical Implementation Points

  • Determine carbapenemase type before treatment whenever possible through phenotypic or genotypic PCR testing for MBL genes. 4
  • Administer ceftazidime-avibactam as prolonged 3-hour infusions, which are associated with improved 30-day survival. 4
  • Do NOT add polymyxin or fosfomycin to the ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam combination for MBL-producers, as the dual regimen alone demonstrates superior outcomes. 3, 4
  • Monitor for resistance emergence: 3.8-10.4% of patients develop ceftazidime-avibactam resistance during treatment; obtain repeat cultures if clinical deterioration occurs within 48-72 hours. 3, 4

When Polymyxin-Based Therapy Might Be Considered

Polymyxin-based combination therapy may only be considered when:

  • Ceftazidime-avibactam is unavailable or unaffordable
  • The organism demonstrates in vitro resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam
  • The patient has severe renal insufficiency requiring careful polymyxin dosing adjustment 1

Even in these scenarios, newer agents like cefiderocol or aztreonam-avibactam (when available) should be prioritized over polymyxin-based regimens given the superior safety and efficacy profiles. 9

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of NDM-Producing Bacterial Infections

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella Bone Infections

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Ceftazidime-avibactam with or without Aztreonam vs Polymyxin-based Combination Therapy for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: A Retrospective Analysis.

Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2023

Research

The Comparative Efficacy of Ceftazidime-Avibactam with or without Aztreonam vs Polymyxins for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2023

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.