What is Cefiderocol used for?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Cefiderocol Use in Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections

Cefiderocol is conditionally recommended for severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) carrying metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) or organisms resistant to all other antibiotics including ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam, but should be avoided for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections due to higher mortality. 1

Primary Indications

Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE)

For MBL-producing CRE specifically:

  • Cefiderocol is conditionally recommended as an alternative option when ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam (the preferred first-line) is unavailable or not feasible 1, 2
  • Clinical cure rates of 75% were achieved with cefiderocol versus 29% with best available therapy in MBL-producing organisms 1, 2
  • Recent pooled data from CREDIBLE-CR and APEKS-NP trials showed 70.8% clinical cure, 58.3% microbiological eradication, and 12.5% 28-day mortality in MBL-producing isolates 1

For severe CRE infections resistant to newer agents:

  • Use cefiderocol when organisms are resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam 1
  • This represents a last-line option with low certainty evidence 1, 2

Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA)

Limited role with very low certainty evidence:

  • Cefiderocol showed non-inferiority to best available therapy in small numbers (2/11 mortality with cefiderocol vs 2/11 with comparator) 1
  • Insufficient evidence exists to recommend for or against combination therapy with cefiderocol for CRPA 1
  • Guidelines cannot recommend for or against its use due to paucity of data 1, 2

Complicated Urinary Tract Infections (cUTI)

FDA-approved indication with demonstrated efficacy:

  • Cefiderocol achieved 73% composite clinical and microbiological cure versus 55% with imipenem-cilastatin in the APEKS-cUTI trial (treatment difference 18.58%, p=0.0004) 3, 4
  • Active against E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, Enterobacter cloacae complex, Morganella morganii, and Citrobacter freundii 3, 4
  • Recommended dose: 2 grams IV every 8 hours infused over 3 hours 5, 4

Critical Contraindication

Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB)

Conditionally recommended AGAINST cefiderocol for CRAB infections:

  • Mortality with cefiderocol was 49% versus 18% with best available therapy 1, 2
  • In CREDIBLE-CR trial, 28-day mortality was 24.8% with cefiderocol versus 18.4% with comparator 2
  • End-of-follow-up mortality reached 33.7% with cefiderocol versus 18.4% with best available therapy 2
  • Use ampicillin-sulbactam for sulbactam-susceptible CRAB or polymyxins/high-dose tigecycline for resistant strains instead 1

Dosing Considerations

Renal Function Adjustments

Cefiderocol requires careful dose adjustment based on creatinine clearance:

  • Standard dose (2g IV q8h over 3 hours) for CrCl 60-119 mL/min 5
  • CrCl 30-59 mL/min: Reduced dosing required (AUC increases 2.35-fold) 5
  • CrCl 15-29 mL/min: Further reduction needed (AUC increases 3.21-fold) 5
  • CrCl <15 mL/min: Significant reduction required (AUC increases 4.69-fold) 5
  • Augmented renal clearance (CrCl ≥120 mL/min): Increase to 2g IV every 6 hours over 3 hours 5, 6

Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT)

  • Approximately 60% removed by 3-4 hour hemodialysis session 5
  • Effluent flow rate is the major determinant of clearance during CRRT 5
  • Dose adjustments based on effluent flow rate to maintain therapeutic exposures 5, 6

Microbiological Spectrum

Active against multiple resistance mechanisms:

  • Stable against all four Ambler classes of β-lactamases including metallo-β-lactamases (NDM, VIM, IMP) 5, 7
  • Active against serine carbapenemases (KPC, OXA-48) 5
  • Maintains activity despite porin deletions (OmpK35/36 in K. pneumoniae, OprD in P. aeruginosa) and efflux pump upregulation 5
  • Active against some colistin-resistant E. coli with mcr-1 5
  • Also covers Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Burkholderia cepacia, and Achromobacter species 6

Limited activity:

  • No clinically relevant activity against Gram-positive bacteria 5, 3
  • No activity against anaerobes including Bacteroides fragilis 3

Combination Therapy Recommendations

Monotherapy is preferred when cefiderocol is susceptible:

  • Strong recommendation against combination therapy for CRE infections susceptible to cefiderocol 1
  • No recommendation for or against combinations with new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors for CRPA 1

Consider combinations only for:

  • Pan-resistant organisms where cefiderocol MIC is elevated 1
  • Severe infections with limited alternatives 1

Safety Profile and Adverse Events

Generally well-tolerated with gastrointestinal predominance:

  • Most common: diarrhea, constipation, nausea, vomiting, upper abdominal pain 3, 4
  • Lower nephrotoxicity compared to polymyxins 1
  • Minimal metabolism (<10% of dose) 5
  • No clinically significant drug-drug interactions with furosemide, metformin, or rosuvastatin 5

Critical Pitfalls and Caveats

Mortality signal in certain infections:

  • Higher all-cause mortality observed in CREDIBLE-CR and APEKS-NP trials for pneumonia and bloodstream infections 3, 8
  • FDA and European prescribing information include warnings about this mortality difference 6
  • Reserve cefiderocol for patients with limited or no alternative treatment options 3

Susceptibility testing challenges:

  • Commercial susceptibility tests have accuracy and reliability issues 6
  • Results should be carefully evaluated and confirmed 6
  • Iron-depleted media required for accurate MIC determination 5

Resistance development:

  • Frequency of resistance at 10× MIC ranges from 10⁻⁶ to <10⁻⁸ 5
  • Risk of treatment-emergent resistance with MBL-producing organisms requires monitoring 1
  • High MIC values in some MBL-producers may predict treatment failure 1

Antibiotic Stewardship Considerations

Reserve cefiderocol as a last-line agent:

  • Avoid use for third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCephRE) when other options exist 1
  • For non-severe CRE infections, consider older antibiotics active in vitro first 1
  • New β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors are reserved antibiotics; use judiciously 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.