What are the results and implications of the PRAISE-HF (Prospective Randomized Study of Omecamtiv Mecarbil (omacamtiv mecarbil) on Symptoms and Exercise in Heart Failure) trial for patients with Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

GALACTIC-HF Trial: Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Omecamtiv mecarbil modestly reduces cardiovascular death or heart failure events in patients with HFrEF, particularly in those with severe disease (LVEF ≤30%, NYHA III/IV) or low systolic blood pressure (≤100 mmHg), but does not improve exercise capacity and remains investigational with limited guideline support. 1, 2, 3

Trial Design and Population

The GALACTIC-HF trial was a large, international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled outcomes trial enrolling over 8,000 patients with chronic symptomatic HFrEF (NYHA class II-IV), LVEF ≤35%, elevated natriuretic peptides, and baseline systolic blood pressure ≥85 mmHg. 4 Patients required either current hospitalization for heart failure or a history of hospitalization/emergency department visit within the prior year. 4

Primary Results

The trial demonstrated a modest but statistically significant reduction in the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or first heart failure event (HR 0.92,95% CI 0.86-0.99, P=0.03). 2 This represents approximately an 8% relative risk reduction across the overall population. 2

Key Subgroup Findings

Patients with Severe Heart Failure

The treatment effect was substantially more pronounced in patients with severe heart failure (LVEF ≤30%, NYHA class III/IV, recent HF hospitalization within 6 months), where omecamtiv mecarbil demonstrated greater benefit in reducing cardiovascular death or heart failure events. 2 This suggests the drug may be most appropriate for higher-risk phenotypes. 2

Patients with Low Blood Pressure

Omecamtiv mecarbil showed particular efficacy in patients with baseline systolic blood pressure ≤100 mmHg (HR 0.81,95% CI 0.70-0.94) compared to those with SBP >100 mmHg (HR 0.95% CI 0.88-1.03, P-interaction=0.051). 1, 3 Critically, the drug did not lower blood pressure values over time and was well-tolerated regardless of baseline blood pressure. 1, 3 This represents a unique advantage over traditional guideline-directed medical therapies that often cause hypotension. 1

Age-Related Outcomes

Treatment efficacy was consistent across age groups (<65 vs ≥65 years, P-interaction=0.76), with similar safety profiles regardless of age. 2 In patients with severe heart failure, benefit was observed in both younger patients (HR 0.77,95% CI 0.64-0.92) and older patients (HR 0.83,95% CI 0.71-0.97). 2

Mechanism of Action

Omecamtiv mecarbil is a selective cardiac myosin activator that increases the transition rate to the strongly bound myosin-actin cross-bridge state, thereby increasing systolic ejection time and stroke volume without increasing intracellular calcium or heart rate. 1, 5 This mechanism differs fundamentally from traditional inotropes that have historically increased mortality. 4, 5

Exercise Capacity Findings

Despite improvements in cardiac function and clinical outcomes, omecamtiv mecarbil did not improve peak exercise capacity (peak VO₂) in the METEORIC-HF trial (mean change -0.24 mL/kg/min vs 0.21 mL/kg/min with placebo, P=0.13). 6 This represents a significant limitation, as exercise intolerance is a cardinal manifestation of HFrEF. 6 The drug also did not improve total workload, ventilatory efficiency, or daily physical activity. 6

Safety Profile

Omecamtiv mecarbil demonstrated a favorable safety profile with adverse event rates similar to placebo, including dizziness (4.9% vs 5.5%), fatigue (4.9% vs 4.4%), and heart failure events (4.9% vs 4.4%). 6 The drug did not affect blood pressure values and was well-tolerated across all baseline blood pressure ranges. 1, 3

Current Guideline Status

The 2022 ACC/AHA/HFSA guidelines identify omecamtiv mecarbil as requiring further study in patients with stage D (advanced) HFrEF, but do not provide a formal recommendation for its use. 1 This reflects the need for additional evidence before widespread clinical adoption. 1

The 2025 European Heart Failure Association consensus statement acknowledges that omecamtiv mecarbil significantly reduced heart failure outcomes in patients with lower baseline systolic blood pressure (≤100 mmHg) without affecting blood pressure values, positioning it as a potential option for this challenging population. 1

Clinical Implications

When to Consider

  • Patients with severe HFrEF (LVEF ≤30%, NYHA III/IV) who remain symptomatic despite optimal guideline-directed medical therapy 2
  • Patients with low systolic blood pressure (≤100 mmHg) who cannot tolerate or adequately up-titrate standard HFrEF therapies due to hypotension 1, 3
  • Patients requiring additional therapy to reduce heart failure events when standard options are maximized 2

Important Limitations

  • Does not improve exercise capacity or quality of life measures 6
  • Modest overall benefit (8% relative risk reduction) compared to more established therapies 2
  • Requires pharmacokinetic-guided dose titration (25,37.5, or 50 mg twice daily) 1, 4
  • Not yet incorporated into standard guideline-directed medical therapy algorithms 1

Developmental Context

The GALACTIC-HF trial represents a novel approach to heart failure drug development, focusing on mechanism-based endpoints (systolic ejection time) in phase II studies rather than generic surrogate markers like NT-proBNP. 1 This strategy confirmed "on-target" cardiac effects before proceeding to the outcomes trial. 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.