Will future Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines cover more strains?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Future HPV Vaccine Strain Coverage

Yes, future HPV vaccines will cover more strains, and this has already occurred—the 9-valent vaccine (Gardasil-9) now covers 9 HPV strains compared to the original 4 strains, and further expansion is theoretically possible and under development. 1

Current Vaccine Evolution

The HPV vaccine landscape has already expanded significantly:

  • The 9-valent vaccine (Gardasil-9) is now the recommended HPV vaccine in the United States, covering HPV types 6,11,16,18,31,33,45,52, and 58—more than double the original quadrivalent vaccine's coverage. 1

  • This expanded coverage protects against approximately 84% of HPV-related cancers in women, compared to 70% with the original bivalent/quadrivalent vaccines. 1

  • The additional five high-risk types (31,33,45,52,58) account for an additional 14% of HPV-related cancers in women and 4% in males beyond what types 16 and 18 cover. 1

Evidence for Continued Development

The scientific literature strongly supports ongoing vaccine development:

  • VLP vaccines for all important carcinogenic HPV types may theoretically be produced, as acknowledged by the American Cancer Society. 2

  • Current research is actively exploring vaccines with broader HPV type coverage, with emphasis on incorporating L1 proteins from additional HPV subtypes. 3

  • Development efforts are focusing on optimizing prophylactic vaccines by including more HPV subtypes and exploring novel adjuvants that could reinforce cellular immune responses. 3

Clinical Implications of Expanded Coverage

The 9-valent vaccine has demonstrated robust efficacy:

  • The vaccine showed 97% efficacy in preventing cervical, vulvar, and vaginal cancer precursor lesions related to the five additional types (31,33,45,52,58). 1

  • The antibody response against the original 4 types (6,11,16,18) in the 9-valent vaccine was non-inferior to the quadrivalent vaccine, meaning no protection was lost while gaining additional coverage. 1

Important Limitations and Caveats

Despite expanded coverage, critical gaps remain:

  • Even the 9-valent vaccine does not cover all cancer-causing HPV types, and cervical cancer screening remains essential even in vaccinated individuals. 1

  • The reduction of cervical cancer risk depends on multiple factors: degree of vaccination coverage, number of carcinogenic HPV types targeted, durability of protection, and continued adherence to screening guidelines. 2

  • Screening will continue to be necessary for the foreseeable future to protect against non-vaccine HPV types and to protect those who were already infected before vaccination. 2

Future Directions

Research is pursuing several avenues for next-generation vaccines:

  • Alternative expression systems and delivery platforms are being developed to create cheaper, more accessible vaccines with broader cross-protection. 4

  • Therapeutic HPV vaccines (as opposed to prophylactic) are under development for treating existing infections and HPV-related diseases. 3

  • Novel formulation strategies, optimized dosing schedules, and age expansion are being explored to address vaccine hesitancy and availability barriers. 3

References

Guideline

HPV Vaccine Comparison

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

HPV vaccines: Global perspectives.

Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2017

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.