What is the recommended treatment for common iliac artery stenosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Common Iliac Artery Stenosis

Endovascular revascularization with primary stenting combined with antiplatelet therapy is the first-line treatment for common iliac artery stenosis, with open surgery reserved for endovascular failure. 1

Treatment Algorithm Based on TASC Classification

The approach to common iliac artery stenosis is stratified by lesion complexity using the TASC II classification system:

TASC A Lesions (Short Stenoses)

  • Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) alone is usually appropriate, with selective stent placement only if PTA results are suboptimal 1
  • Antiplatelet therapy should be initiated as adjunctive treatment 1
  • Surgical revascularization is not appropriate for initial therapy (rating 4/9) 1

TASC B Lesions (Short Occlusions)

  • Primary PTA or primary stenting are both usually appropriate (rating 8/9) 1
  • Antiplatelet therapy is essential as adjunctive treatment 1
  • Best medical management alone is usually not appropriate (rating 2/9) 1

TASC C Lesions (Bilateral Stenoses/Occlusions)

  • Primary stenting combined with antiplatelet therapy is the first choice (rating 8/9) 1, 2
  • Open surgery is appropriate (rating 7/9) but should be reserved for endovascular failure 1
  • Recent data support an endovascular-first approach even for these complex lesions, with 5- to 6-year patency rates similar to open surgery 1, 2

TASC D Lesions (Diffuse Aortoiliac Disease)

  • Catheter-directed aortoiliac stent or stent-graft placement with or without femoral angioplasty combined with antiplatelet therapy is the first choice 1
  • Open surgery should be performed if endovascular therapy fails 1
  • Multiple societal guidelines now recommend an endovascular-first approach for all TASC lesions, including D lesions 1

Critical Technical Considerations

Concomitant Superficial Femoral Artery Disease

Any stenotic (>50%) superficial femoral artery (SFA) must be addressed at the time of iliac intervention, as untreated SFA stenosis is a strong predictor of iliac intervention failure with only 36% 3-year primary patency 1, 3, 2

In contrast, occluded SFAs can be observed, demonstrating 84% 3-year primary patency 1

Stent Selection

  • Covered balloon-expandable stents demonstrate superior outcomes compared to bare metal stents, particularly for TASC C and D lesions 1
  • At 18-month follow-up, covered stents show significantly better binary restenosis rates (95.4% vs 82.2%), lower amputation rates (1.2% vs 3.6%), and improved clinical outcomes (94.2% vs 76.7%) 1
  • Five-year primary patency rates are significantly higher with covered stents (87% vs 53%) in patients undergoing simultaneous common femoral artery endarterectomy and iliac revascularization 1

Essential Adjunctive Medical Therapy

Antiplatelet Therapy

  • Single-agent antiplatelet therapy is mandatory for all symptomatic patients to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events and cardiovascular mortality 3, 2
  • Antiplatelet therapy receives the highest appropriateness rating (8/9) across all TASC classifications 1

Lipid Management

  • High-dose statin therapy is indicated for all patients with peripheral arterial disease if tolerated (class IA recommendation) 3, 2

Supervised Exercise Therapy

  • A supervised exercise program should be initiated in conjunction with iliac intervention, along with risk factor modification including smoking cessation and control of hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and hypertension 1, 3

Acute Thromboembolism: Different Approach

For isolated acute embolic events involving the common iliac artery, the treatment paradigm differs:

  • Surgical revascularization is the best treatment for acute embolic events 1
  • Catheter-directed mechanical thrombectomy is usually appropriate 1
  • Anticoagulation is usually indicated except in situations such as recent surgery 1
  • CTA is the preferred diagnostic modality, revealing the exact nature and level of both thrombosis and underlying atherosclerotic plaque 1

Comparative Outcomes: Endovascular vs Open Surgery

Recent evidence demonstrates that endovascular and open surgical approaches have equivalent outcomes:

  • Similar 2-year survival, limb salvage (100% vs 92.3%), and primary/primary-assisted patency (85% vs 85%) 1
  • Endovascular revascularization is associated with increased secondary interventions but decreased hospital length of stay and fewer postoperative complications 1, 2
  • Open surgery maintains a stable 30-day mortality of 3.6% and major complication rate of 20% 1
  • When short-term and long-term outcomes are equivalent, endovascular techniques should be used first 1

Predictors of Failure to Avoid

Multiple independent predictors of iliac intervention failure have been identified: hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, chronic renal insufficiency, poor tibial runoff, external iliac artery disease, female gender, smoking, gangrene, ulcer, diabetes mellitus, presence of a distal bypass, and hormone replacement therapy in female patients 1, 2

The most critical modifiable factor is addressing concomitant SFA stenosis at the time of intervention, which can improve 3-year primary patency from 36% to 75% 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Bilateral Iliac Artery Stenosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Initial Management of Iliac Artery Stenosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.