Is gabapentin (Neurontin) contraindicated in patients with a history of stroke?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Gabapentin is NOT Contraindicated in Stroke Patients

Gabapentin is not only safe to use in patients with a history of stroke, but is actually recommended as a first-line treatment for central post-stroke pain and has demonstrated efficacy for post-stroke seizures. There are no contraindications to gabapentin use in stroke patients.

Recommended Uses of Gabapentin in Stroke Patients

Central Post-Stroke Pain (CPSP)

  • Gabapentin is recommended as first-line treatment for central post-stroke pain, which affects 2-5% of stroke patients 1.
  • The Canadian Stroke Best Practice guidelines specifically recommend anticonvulsants such as gabapentin or pregabalin as first-line treatment for persistent CPSP 1.
  • The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines list gabapentin as a reasonable second-line treatment option for central post-stroke pain (Class IIb, Level B evidence) 1.
  • The World Stroke Organization synthesis recommends offering gabapentin as one of the initial treatment choices for neuropathic pain after stroke 1.

Post-Stroke Seizures

  • Gabapentin has demonstrated long-term efficacy and safety for late-onset post-stroke seizures, with only 18.3% recurrence rate and excellent tolerability (only 2.8% discontinuation rate) 2.
  • Clinical evidence supports gabapentin monotherapy as useful and safe for late poststroke epileptic seizures 2.

Emerging Evidence for Stroke Recovery

  • Recent preclinical research suggests gabapentin may promote neuroplasticity and functional recovery after stroke by facilitating reorganization of spared cortical pathways 3.
  • Gabapentin administration promotes structural and functional plasticity of the corticospinal pathway after cortical stroke 3.

Clinical Efficacy Data

  • In patients with thalamic pain syndrome (a type of CPSP), gabapentin 300 mg twice daily significantly reduced pain intensity (NRS decreased from 5.9 to 4.7, p=0.002) after one month of treatment 4.
  • Case reports demonstrate that gabapentin can be effective when other oral analgesics fail for central post-stroke pain syndrome 5.
  • Gabapentin is well-tolerated with minimal drug interactions, making it particularly suitable for stroke patients who are often on multiple medications 4.

Important Clinical Considerations

Renal Function Monitoring: While gabapentin itself has no stroke-specific contraindications, it is primarily renally excreted and requires dose adjustment in patients with renal impairment 1. This is particularly relevant as stroke patients may have comorbid renal disease.

Avoid Benzodiazepines Instead: The actual medication to avoid in stroke patients is diazepam and other benzodiazepines during the stroke recovery period due to possible deleterious effects on recovery and sedation side effects 1.

Timing of Initiation: For central post-stroke pain, gabapentin should be initiated when pain is persistent and interfering with activities of daily living, sleep, or quality of life 1.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

The Efficacy of Gabapentin in Patients with Central Post-stroke Pain.

Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR, 2015

Research

Central post-stroke pain syndrome: yet another use for gabapentin?

American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 2002

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.