Treatment of Complete Supraspinatus Tear
For a complete supraspinatus tear, surgical repair is the preferred treatment to achieve tendon-to-bone healing, which is directly associated with superior strength outcomes and functional recovery, particularly in patients under 65 years of age. 1, 2
Initial Treatment Decision Algorithm
Patient Age Considerations
- Patients under 65 years: Proceed with surgical repair as the primary treatment, as healing rates are significantly higher (57% complete healing rate in patients over 65 versus 71% overall) 2
- Patients over 65 years: Surgical repair remains beneficial but counsel regarding lower healing rates (only 43% achieve complete tendon healing) 2
Surgical Approach
- Arthroscopic repair using tension-band suture technique is the recommended surgical method, achieving 71% complete tendon-to-bone healing rates 2
- The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons confirms that rotator cuff repair involves reattaching the torn tendon to bone using arthroscopic, mini-open, or open techniques 1
- Acromioplasty is NOT required during rotator cuff repair for normal acromial bone morphology (including type II and III), as studies show no significant outcome differences with or without acromioplasty 1
Critical Assessment of Associated Pathology
Evaluate Adjacent Tendon Involvement
- Check for subscapularis and infraspinatus delamination tears, as their presence significantly reduces healing rates (p = 0.02) 2
- If isolated supraspinatus tear: Expect 71% complete healing with standard arthroscopic repair 2
- If associated with partial tears of adjacent tendons: Repair the partial tears concurrently through curettage-closure of delamination tears to optimize outcomes 3
Tear Characteristics Matter
- Measure tear retraction and width to guide surgical planning 1
- For high-grade partial thickness tears (≥50% tendon thickness): Consider completion to full-thickness tear followed by repair, which paradoxically shows lower retear rates (3.6%) compared to primary full-thickness tear repair (16.3%) 4
Surgical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors
Expected Functional Improvement
- Constant score improves from average 51.6 preoperatively to 83.8 postoperatively (p < 0.001) 2
- UCLA score improves from 11.5 to 32.3 (p < 0.001) 2
- Shoulder elevation strength is significantly better when tendon heals (7.3 kg) versus non-healed repairs (4.7 kg) (p = 0.001) 2
Negative Prognostic Factors
- Age over 65 years (p < 0.001) 2
- Associated delamination of subscapularis or infraspinatus (p = 0.02) 2
- Irreparable supraspinatus combined with irreparable subscapularis leads to poor outcomes and may not warrant surgical intervention 5
Non-Surgical Treatment (Limited Role)
Non-surgical management may be considered only in specific circumstances:
- Physical therapy to improve strength, flexibility, and function 1
- Corticosteroid injections for temporary inflammation relief 1
- Activity modification and anti-inflammatory medications 1
However, these approaches do not achieve tendon-to-bone healing and result in inferior strength outcomes compared to surgical repair 2
Postoperative Protocol
- Sling immobilization for 4-6 weeks followed by progressive rehabilitation over several months 1
- Rehabilitation should focus on restoring range of motion first, then progressive strengthening 1
- Patient satisfaction is high: 62 of 65 patients (95%) satisfied with surgical outcomes 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not ignore partial tears of adjacent tendons during surgical planning, as they significantly impact healing rates and should be addressed concurrently 2, 3
- Do not perform unnecessary acromioplasty in patients with normal acromion morphology 1
- Do not assume equivalent outcomes in elderly patients—counsel appropriately about reduced healing rates in those over 65 2
- Do not rely on non-surgical treatment when surgical repair is feasible, as tendon-to-bone healing is the key determinant of strength recovery 2