What is the meaning of the P/F (PaO2/FiO2) ratio?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

P/F Ratio: Definition and Clinical Meaning

The P/F ratio (PaO2/FiO2 ratio) is calculated by dividing the partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) by the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), providing a standardized measure of oxygenation efficiency that is critical for assessing hypoxemia severity and guiding respiratory management. 1

Core Definition

  • The P/F ratio represents how efficiently the lungs transfer oxygen from inspired air into arterial blood 1
  • It is calculated as: PaO2 (in mmHg) ÷ FiO2 (as a decimal) 2
  • For example, if PaO2 is 80 mmHg on 40% oxygen (FiO2 0.40), the P/F ratio = 80 ÷ 0.40 = 200 mmHg 1
  • Normal P/F ratio is approximately 400-500 mmHg, indicating healthy gas exchange 1

Clinical Significance and Severity Classification

The Berlin definition uses P/F ratio thresholds to classify acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) severity: 1

  • Mild ARDS: P/F ratio 201-300 mmHg 1
  • Moderate ARDS: P/F ratio 101-200 mmHg 1
  • Severe ARDS: P/F ratio ≤100 mmHg 1

Values below 300 mmHg indicate acute lung injury requiring escalating interventions from supplemental oxygen to mechanical ventilation with lung-protective strategies 1. A low P/F ratio correlates with increased mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, and longer ICU stays 1.

Prognostic Value

  • The change in P/F ratio following initial treatment of ARDS can discriminate between survivors and nonsurvivors 2
  • Patients who demonstrate improvement in P/F ratio within the first 24 hours have better outcomes than those who do not 2
  • However, the P/F ratio alone has limited predictive accuracy for mortality (AUROC 0.60-0.64) and should not be used as the sole prognostic tool 3
  • Reclassifying P/F ratio 24 hours after initial management provides better prognostic information than the initial value 1

Important Limitations and Pitfalls

Do not rely solely on P/F ratio for clinical decisions; it must be integrated with clinical assessment and other parameters: 1

  • The P/F ratio varies substantially with FiO2, particularly when shunt fraction (QS/QT) is 0.1-0.3 and FiO2 is greater than 0.4 4
  • Hemoglobin concentration and arterial-venous oxygen content difference have large effects that can confound interpretation 4
  • Barometric pressure has substantial effects on the ratio 4
  • For the same P/F ratio, a patient on higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may have more severe lung injury than one on lower PEEP 5
  • The P/F ratio may be affected by factors other than lung pathology, including cardiac output and hemoglobin concentration 1

Measurement Considerations

  • The P/F ratio is most reliable when measured at FiO2 ≥0.5 and PEEP ≥10 cmH2O at 24 hours after ARDS onset 6
  • Consider arterial blood gas analysis rather than pulse oximetry alone for accurate P/F ratio calculation in severe cases 1
  • Indices of oxygenation, such as the P/F ratio, are unreliable predictors of weaning outcome except in patients with marked hypoxemia (PaO2 <55 mmHg at FiO2 ≥0.40) 2

Clinical Application in Respiratory Management

For severe hypoxemia (P/F ratio <150 mmHg), preoxygenation with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is suggested before intubation: 2

  • In patients with P/F ratio <200 mmHg, desaturation rates during intubation are 35% with high-flow nasal oxygen versus 24% with NIPPV 2
  • Patients typically have at least moderate acute respiratory failure when baseline P/F ratio is <200 mmHg 2
  • Post-treatment P/F ratio values are generally higher with NIPPV compared to high-flow nasal oxygen in post-extubation management 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.