Is spironolactone (aldosterone antagonist) effective for treating Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Spironolactone for HFpEF

Spironolactone may be considered for HFpEF primarily to reduce heart failure hospitalizations, but it does not reduce mortality and carries a Class IIb recommendation, meaning it is not strongly recommended and should only be used in carefully selected patients with intensive monitoring for hyperkalemia and renal dysfunction. 1

Evidence Base and Efficacy

The TOPCAT trial, the landmark study evaluating spironolactone in HFpEF, showed no significant reduction in the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death, aborted cardiac arrest, or heart failure hospitalization overall (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.77-1.04; P=0.14). 2 However, spironolactone did significantly reduce heart failure hospitalizations specifically (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.69-0.99; P=0.04). 2

The benefit of spironolactone appears strongest in patients enrolled based on elevated natriuretic peptides rather than hospitalization history alone. 3 In the Americas subgroup of TOPCAT, where medication adherence was verified, spironolactone demonstrated clear superiority over placebo in reducing cardiovascular events, whereas the Russia/Georgia cohort showed questionable adherence and no benefit. 4

Current Guideline Recommendations

The American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and Heart Failure Society of America assign spironolactone a Class IIb recommendation (Level B-R evidence) for HFpEF, indicating it "might be considered" but is not a strong recommendation. 1 This contrasts sharply with SGLT2 inhibitors, which carry a Class 2a recommendation and should be prioritized as first-line disease-modifying therapy. 5

Patient Selection Criteria

Spironolactone should only be considered in HFpEF patients who meet ALL of the following strict criteria: 1

  • Ejection fraction ≥45%
  • Elevated BNP levels OR heart failure hospitalization within the past year
  • eGFR >30 mL/min/1.73 m²
  • Serum creatinine <2.5 mg/dL in men or <2.0 mg/dL in women
  • Serum potassium <5.0 mEq/L
  • Symptomatic heart failure despite standard therapy

Post-hoc analyses suggest efficacy is greatest in patients with LVEF at the lower end of the HFpEF spectrum (closer to 45% than 65%). 1, 5

Dosing and Monitoring Protocol

Initial dose: 12.5-25 mg once daily, with target dose of 25-50 mg once daily. 1

Intensive monitoring schedule is mandatory: 1

  • Baseline: Potassium, creatinine, eGFR
  • Early phase: 3 days, 1 week, then at 1,4,8, and 12 weeks
  • Maintenance phase: 6,9, and 12 months, then every 6 months thereafter

Safety Considerations and Risks

Hyperkalemia occurs at double the rate with spironolactone (18.7% vs 9.1% with placebo) and is the primary safety concern. 2 Risk is amplified by declining renal function, concurrent ACE inhibitor or ARB use, NSAID or COX-2 inhibitor use, elderly patients with low muscle mass, and dehydration. 1

Gynecomastia or breast pain occurs in approximately 10% of men. 1 Patients must avoid NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, salt substitutes containing potassium, and excessive dietary potassium intake. 1

Clinical Context and Treatment Algorithm

Unlike HFrEF, where spironolactone provides clear mortality benefit, in HFpEF the benefit is limited to reducing hospitalizations without mortality reduction. 1 This fundamentally changes the risk-benefit calculation.

Recommended treatment sequence for HFpEF: 5

  1. First-line: SGLT2 inhibitors (dapagliflozin or empagliflozin) - Class 2a recommendation with mortality and hospitalization benefits
  2. Second-line consideration: Spironolactone - only in patients with LVEF 45-50%, elevated natriuretic peptides, and who can tolerate intensive monitoring

Physiologic Benefits vs Clinical Outcomes

Spironolactone improves diastolic function parameters, including E/e' ratio (MD -1.38; 95% CI -2.03 to -0.73) and E/A velocity ratio (MD -0.05; 95% CI -0.10 to -0.00), demonstrating physiologic benefit. 6 However, these improvements in cardiac structure and function do not translate to mortality reduction or improved functional capacity (no change in 6-minute walk distance). 6

Real-World Evidence

A large Veterans Affairs study of 52,881 patients with HFpEF showed spironolactone use associated with 21% reduction in all-cause death (95% CI 13-29%; P<0.0001) in real-world practice, though this observational data is subject to confounding and selection bias. 7

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not treat HFpEF patients the same as HFrEF patients - the evidence base and treatment responses differ fundamentally. 5 Do not use spironolactone without establishing intensive monitoring protocols - hyperkalemia risk is substantial and requires proactive management. 1 Do not prescribe spironolactone before optimizing SGLT2 inhibitor therapy - SGLT2 inhibitors have stronger evidence and should be prioritized. 5

References

Guideline

Spironolactone for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Spironolactone for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

The New England journal of medicine, 2014

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Treatment for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.