Interpretation and Management of Spirometry Showing Proportional Reduction in FEV1 and FVC with Preserved Ratio
Primary Interpretation
This spirometry demonstrates a restrictive pattern (not obstruction), with FEV1 73% predicted, FVC 73% predicted, and FEV1/FVC ratio of 96.52% (well above the threshold for obstruction). 1
Pattern Analysis
Why This is NOT Obstructive Disease
The FEV1/FVC ratio of 96.52% is substantially elevated above the lower limit of normal (5th percentile) and far exceeds the 70% threshold, definitively ruling out obstructive lung disease. 1
An obstructive defect requires FEV1/FVC below the 5th percentile of predicted (typically <70% in most age groups), which is not present here. 1, 2
The proportional reduction in both FEV1 and FVC with a preserved or elevated ratio is the hallmark of restriction, not obstruction. 1, 3
Restrictive Pattern Characteristics
Both FEV1 (73% predicted) and FVC (73% predicted) are reduced below 80% of predicted values, indicating a restrictive pattern. 3
The elevated FEV1/FVC ratio (96.52%) further supports restriction rather than obstruction. 1, 3
PEF is reduced to 69% predicted, which is proportional to the volume reductions and consistent with restriction. 3
Critical Diagnostic Step Required
Total lung capacity (TLC) measurement by body plethysmography is mandatory to confirm true restrictive lung disease versus other causes of this pattern. 1, 3
Why TLC Measurement is Essential
A reduced FVC with normal or elevated FEV1/FVC ratio suggests restriction only when confirmed by TLC measurement below the 5th percentile of predicted. 1, 3
This spirometric pattern can represent three distinct conditions that cannot be differentiated without TLC measurement: 1, 3
- True restrictive lung disease (TLC <5th percentile)
- Submaximal effort or poor technique (TLC normal, all volumes proportionally reduced)
- Peripheral airway dysfunction with air trapping (TLC normal or high, increased RV/TLC ratio)
The European Respiratory Society emphasizes that when FEV1 and FVC are concomitantly decreased with normal or elevated FEV1/FVC ratio, this pattern most frequently reflects failure to inhale or exhale completely rather than true restriction. 3
Diagnostic Algorithm
Step 1: Assess Test Quality
- Review the flow-volume loops for adequate effort and reproducibility. 3
- Ensure the patient performed maximal inspiratory and expiratory maneuvers. 1, 3
- Poor effort is the most common cause of this pattern in clinical practice. 3
Step 2: Order Complete Pulmonary Function Testing
- Obtain lung volumes (TLC, RV, RV/TLC ratio) by body plethysmography to distinguish between: 1, 3
- True restriction: TLC <5th percentile (or <80% predicted)
- Normal lung volumes with poor effort: TLC and RV normal
- Peripheral airway disease: TLC normal with increased RV and RV/TLC ratio
Step 3: Interpret Based on TLC Results
If TLC is reduced (<5th percentile): 1, 3
- Confirms true restrictive lung disease
- Pursue differential diagnosis including:
- Interstitial lung diseases (obtain DLCO, imaging)
- Chest wall disorders
- Neuromuscular disease
- Pleural disease
- Obesity
If TLC is normal or elevated: 1, 3
- Rules out true restriction
- Consider:
- Repeat spirometry with careful coaching if effort was suboptimal
- Evaluate for small airway disease if RV/TLC ratio is elevated
- Assess for other causes of dyspnea if symptomatic
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Never diagnose restrictive lung disease based on spirometry alone without TLC measurement—this leads to frequent misdiagnosis. 1, 3
Do not use single-breath TLC estimates (such as VA from DLCO testing) to confirm restriction, as these systematically underestimate TLC and increase misclassification risk. 1, 3
Do not assume this pattern represents obstruction simply because the patient has respiratory symptoms—the FEV1/FVC ratio definitively excludes obstruction. 1
In patients with working diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis, pleural disease, or chest wall disease, the positive predictive value for true restriction exceeds 90%. 4
Additional Testing Considerations
Measure DLCO (diffusing capacity) if true restriction is confirmed, as this helps differentiate parenchymal from extraparenchymal causes. 1
Consider bronchodilator testing if there is clinical suspicion of reversible component, though the elevated FEV1/FVC ratio makes significant obstruction unlikely. 1
Assess respiratory muscle strength if neuromuscular disease is suspected. 1