From the Guidelines
The normal range for aortic valve area (AVA) assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is typically 3.0 to 4.0 cm². This measurement represents the opening of the aortic valve during systole when blood flows from the left ventricle into the aorta. A valve area less than 2.0 cm² indicates some degree of stenosis, with severe aortic stenosis typically defined as an AVA less than 1.0 cm², as stated in the guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease 1.
Key Considerations
- TTE assessment of AVA is usually performed using the continuity equation, which relies on Doppler measurements of blood flow velocities and the diameter of the left ventricular outflow tract.
- The accuracy of AVA measurement by TTE can be affected by factors such as image quality, angle of Doppler interrogation, and irregular heart rhythms.
- When TTE results are equivocal or technically limited, additional imaging modalities such as transesophageal echocardiography, cardiac CT, or cardiac MRI may be considered for more accurate assessment, as recommended by the 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease 2.
Clinical Decision-Making
- The diagnosis of severe AS must be based on an integrated approach including transvalvular velocity/gradient, valve area, valve morphology, flow rate, LV morphology and function, blood pressure, and symptoms, as emphasized in the recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis 3, 4.
- In patients with a valve area <1.0 cm², further classification based on the combination of velocity (gradient), transvalvular SV, and LV ejection fraction is recommended.
- Dobutamine stress echocardiography may be useful in distinguishing truly severe AS from pseudo-severe AS, especially in patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS, as discussed in the guidelines 1, 4.
Important Factors
- The degree of aortic valve calcification is a strong predictor of clinical outcome, even when evaluated qualitatively by echocardiography, as noted in the 2020 ACC/AHA guideline 2.
- Quantitation of aortic valve calcium by CT imaging is especially useful in patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS of unclear severity with either a normal or reduced LVEF.
- Sex-specific Agaston unit thresholds for diagnosis of severe AS are 1300 in women and 2000 in men, reflecting the contribution of leaflet fibrosis, in addition to calcification, to increased leaflet stiffness 2.
From the Research
Normal Range for Aortic Valve Area Assessed by TTE
The normal range for aortic valve area (AVA) assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) can vary based on several factors including sex, age, and race.
- Studies have shown that women tend to have smaller AVA values compared to men 5.
- AVA values also decrease with age in both men and women 5.
- Additionally, there are racial differences in AVA values, with Asians tend to have lower AVA values compared to whites and blacks 5.
- The mean AVA derived by TTE has been reported to be around 0.74 +/- 0.27 cm2 in patients with aortic stenosis 6.
- However, in healthy adult subjects, the AVA values calculated using the continuity equation were found to be higher, with significant differences between men and women 5.
- It is essential to consider these factors when interpreting AVA values assessed by TTE to ensure accurate diagnosis and treatment of aortic stenosis.
Key Findings
- Women have smaller LVOT diameters and AVA values compared to men 5.
- AVA values decrease with age in both men and women 5.
- There are racial differences in AVA values, with Asians tend to have lower AVA values compared to whites and blacks 5.
- The implementation of sex-, age-, and race-specific normative values for AVA and Doppler parameters is crucial for accurate clinical decision-making 5.
Comparison with Other Imaging Modalities
- TTE has been compared to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and cardiac magnetic resonance tomography (CMR) for assessing AVA 7, 8, 6.
- The mean AVA derived by TTE, TEE, and CMR were found to be 0.74 +/- 0.27, 0.87 +/- 25, and 0.97 +/- 0.30 cm2, respectively 6.
- Three-dimensional echocardiography has also been shown to be a reliable and accurate method for assessing AVA 9.