Treatment of Saccular Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Elective repair should be considered for saccular infrarenal AAA ≥45 mm, with endovascular repair (EVAR) preferred over open repair when anatomy is suitable and life expectancy exceeds 2 years. 1
Key Treatment Thresholds
Saccular aneurysms require different management than fusiform AAAs due to their higher rupture risk at smaller diameters:
Saccular AAA ≥45 mm warrants consideration for elective repair (Class IIb, Level C recommendation), which is notably lower than the 55 mm threshold for fusiform aneurysms in men 1
Symptomatic saccular AAAs require urgent repair regardless of size, as 25% of acutely presenting saccular aneurysms have diameters <5.5 cm and 8.4% are <4.5 cm—far higher rates than fusiform aneurysms 1
Saccular aneurysms are more common in women and more likely to be symptomatic at smaller sizes than fusiform aneurysms 1
Treatment Approach Algorithm
For Asymptomatic Saccular AAA ≥45 mm:
Step 1: Assess Life Expectancy and Surgical Risk
- If life expectancy <2 years: repair is not recommended 1
- If life expectancy >2 years: proceed to anatomic evaluation 1
Step 2: Anatomic Evaluation
- Obtain cardiovascular CT (CCT) as the optimal pre-operative imaging modality to assess entire aorta and determine EVAR feasibility 1
- Perform duplex ultrasound (DUS) of femoro-popliteal segment to detect concomitant aneurysms 1
- Assess adherence to device-specific instructions for use 1
Step 3: Select Repair Method
- EVAR is preferred when anatomy is suitable and life expectancy >2 years, reducing peri-operative mortality to <1% 1
- Open repair is reasonable if patient cannot comply with lifelong post-EVAR surveillance requirements 1
- For high perioperative risk patients with suitable anatomy, EVAR is reasonable to reduce 30-day morbidity and mortality 1
For Symptomatic Saccular AAA (Any Size):
Immediate Management:
- Admit to ICU for arterial blood pressure monitoring and tight BP control (target systolic <120 mmHg) 2
- Initiate anti-impulse therapy with IV beta-blockers as first-line (target heart rate 60-80 bpm) 2
- Provide adequate pain control 2
- Perform repair within 24-48 hours to reduce risk of free rupture 1
Definitive Treatment:
- EVAR is recommended over open repair when anatomy is suitable to reduce peri-operative morbidity and mortality 1
Technical Considerations
EVAR Advantages:
- Peri-operative mortality <1% compared to open repair 1
- Reduced 30-day morbidity in high-risk patients 1
- Percutaneous femoral approach with ultrasound guidance reduces access-related complications 1
EVAR Limitations:
- Requires lifelong surveillance for endoleaks, graft migration, and aneurysm sac changes 1
- Higher long-term re-intervention risk compared to open repair 1
- Type I and Type III endoleaks require prompt correction to prevent rupture 1, 2
- Chronic anticoagulation increases risk of re-intervention, late conversion, or mortality 1
Open Repair Considerations:
- Appropriate for patients unable to comply with post-EVAR surveillance 1
- Mid-line laparotomy with Dacron graft replacement typically required for infrarenal saccular AAA due to coexistent atherosclerosis making patch repair difficult 3
- Higher peri-operative morbidity but no long-term surveillance requirements 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not wait for standard 55 mm threshold: Saccular morphology increases rupture risk at smaller diameters than fusiform aneurysms 1
- Do not delay repair of symptomatic aneurysms: Symptoms indicate impending rupture regardless of diameter 1, 2
- Do not perform EVAR without confirming adherence to manufacturer's instructions for use, as off-label use increases complication rates 1
- Do not neglect post-EVAR surveillance: Endoleaks occur in up to one-third of patients and require monitoring with CCT or DUS at 6-12 months, then annually for 5 years 1