Tigecycline Efficacy in Treating Infections
Tigecycline demonstrates good efficacy (72-85% clinical cure rates) for its FDA-approved indications—complicated skin/skin structure infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections—but should be reserved for situations when alternative treatments are unsuitable due to an increased all-cause mortality risk of 0.6% compared to comparators. 1
FDA-Approved Indications with Proven Efficacy
Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections (cSSSI)
- Clinical cure rates exceed 80% in clinically evaluable patients when treating cSSSI caused by susceptible organisms including MRSA, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and various gram-negative pathogens 2
- Standard dosing (100 mg loading, then 50 mg every 12 hours) achieves optimal outcomes for pathogens with MICs ≤0.25 mg/L 3
- In a Phase 3 non-comparative study of resistant gram-negative infections, cSSSI represented 67% of cases with a 72.2% clinical cure rate 4
Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections (cIAI)
- Clinical cure rates of >80% demonstrated in Phase III trials comparing tigecycline to imipenem/cilastatin 2
- Standard dosing is effective for pathogens with MICs ≤1 mg/L 3
- Active against polymicrobial infections including Bacteroides species and resistant Enterobacteriaceae 1
Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)
- FDA-approved for CAP caused by susceptible S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and Legionella pneumophila 1
- Standard dosing achieves good outcomes for pathogens with MICs ≤0.5 mg/L 3
Critical Limitations and Contraindications
Hospital-Acquired and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
- Tigecycline is NOT indicated for HAP/VAP due to greater mortality and decreased efficacy in comparative trials 1
- In a Phase 3 trial, cure rates for VAP were significantly lower with tigecycline (47.9%) versus imipenem (70.1%) 5
- Tigecycline concentrations in endothelial lining fluid are extremely low (0.01-0.02 mg/L), explaining poor pulmonary efficacy 5
- Despite this, retrospective data show 30-day mortality of 60.5% for HAP treated with tigecycline, suggesting it may be considered only when no alternatives exist 6
Bacteremia and Bloodstream Infections
- Tigecycline should not be used as monotherapy for bacteremia due to poor outcomes with standard dosing 7
- Standard dosing achieves serum Cmax of only 0.87 mg/L, insufficient for intravascular infections 5, 7
- Clinical series confirm poor outcomes in A. baumannii bacteremia treated with tigecycline 5
Diabetic Foot Infections
- Tigecycline is NOT indicated for diabetic foot infections as a clinical trial failed to demonstrate non-inferiority 1
Efficacy Against Multidrug-Resistant Organisms
Acinetobacter baumannii
- Tigecycline inhibits 91-98% of A. baumannii isolates at ≤2 mg/L 5
- In a Phase 3 study, A. baumannii was the most common resistant pathogen (47% of isolates) 4
- For severe A. baumannii infections, higher dosing (200 mg loading, then 100 mg every 12 hours) achieves 85% cure rates versus 69.6% with standard dosing 7
- Combination therapy with another active agent is recommended for carbapenem-resistant strains 5, 7
Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)
- Standard dosing achieves cumulative response rates of only 4.96-66.39% for CRKP and 13.14-95.18% for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter 3
- Higher dosing (100 mg every 12 hours maintenance) significantly improves outcomes for CRE infections 3
- Combination therapy with polymyxins or meropenem is preferred over monotherapy 7
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci (VRE)
- Tigecycline demonstrates in vitro activity against VRE 2, 8
- Standard dosing (50 mg every 12 hours after loading) is appropriate for VRE complicated intra-abdominal infections 7
Dosing Considerations for Optimal Efficacy
Standard Dosing
- 100 mg IV loading dose, followed by 50 mg IV every 12 hours for 5-14 days (cSSSI/cIAI) or 7-14 days (CAP) 1
- No dose adjustment required for renal impairment or continuous renal replacement therapy 1
- Severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C) requires reduced maintenance dose of 25 mg every 12 hours 1
Higher Dosing for Severe Infections
- For severe pulmonary infections and MDR organisms, 200 mg IV loading followed by 100 mg IV every 12 hours demonstrates superior efficacy (85% vs 69.6% cure rates) 7, 9
- Higher dosing increases average cumulative fractions of response from 38.18% to 56.21% for cSSSI 3
Pharmacokinetic Profile Supporting Efficacy
- Large volume of distribution (7-9 L/kg) indicating extensive tissue penetration 2, 8
- Long elimination half-life (42.4 hours) supporting twice-daily dosing 2
- Excellent penetration into blister fluid supporting efficacy in skin infections 8
- Poor penetration into serum and endothelial lining fluid limits efficacy in bloodstream and pulmonary infections 5, 7
- Efficacy best predicted by AUC/MIC ratio 8
Safety Considerations Affecting Clinical Use
Black Box Warning
- Meta-analysis demonstrates 0.6% increased all-cause mortality (95% CI 0.1-1.2) in tigecycline-treated patients versus comparators 1
- The cause of this mortality difference has not been established 1
- Tigecycline should be reserved for situations when alternative treatments are not suitable 1
Common Adverse Events
- Nausea (28.5-29.5%), vomiting (19.4%), and diarrhea (11.6-16%) are most frequent 1, 2
- Most gastrointestinal adverse events are mild to moderate in severity 4
- Superinfection occurs in 29.6% of patients, most commonly with P. aeruginosa (46.9% of superinfections) 6
Clinical Context for Use
Tigecycline should be positioned as a reserve agent for approved indications when patients have documented resistance to standard therapies, allergies/intolerances to multiple antibiotic classes, or infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms. 1, 4 The increased mortality risk and specific limitations in HAP/VAP and bacteremia mandate careful patient selection and consideration of combination therapy for severe infections caused by resistant pathogens. 5, 7, 1