What are the differences between Ramipril, Enalapril, and Lisinopril when choosing an Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitor for hypertension treatment?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

When selecting an ACE inhibitor for first-line hypertension treatment, lisinopril is often the preferred choice due to its once-daily dosing and no need for hepatic activation. The choice between ramipril, enalapril, and lisinopril should be based on dosing frequency, cost, and patient-specific factors. Lisinopril is dosed once daily, starting at 10mg daily, with a maximum dose of 40mg, and has a similar side effect profile to the other two options, including dry cough, angioedema, hyperkalemia, and acute kidney injury 1. Ramipril, also dosed once daily, starting at 2.5mg daily, with a maximum dose of 20mg, has good evidence for cardiovascular protection. Enalapril, on the other hand, requires twice-daily dosing, starting at 5mg twice daily, with a maximum dose of 40mg daily, which may reduce adherence. Patient factors to consider include renal function, as all three medications require dose adjustment in kidney disease, pregnancy status, as all are contraindicated, and insurance coverage. The available data suggest that there are no differences among ACE inhibitors in their effects on symptoms or survival, and treatment with an ACE inhibitor should be initiated at low doses, followed by gradual dose increments if lower doses have been well tolerated 1. It is also important to assess renal function and serum potassium within 1 to 2 weeks of initiation of therapy and periodically thereafter, especially in patients with preexisting hypotension, hyponatremia, diabetes mellitus, azotemia, or in those taking potassium supplements 1. The ALLHAT study found that there were no significant differences in end-stage renal failure in the three arms, and the slopes of the reciprocal of serum creatinine, as well as estimated creatinine clearance, were virtually identical in the chlorthalidone and lisinopril groups 1. Ultimately, the choice of ACE inhibitor depends on balancing efficacy, convenience, tolerability, and cost for the individual patient. Key factors to consider when choosing an ACE inhibitor include:

  • Dosing frequency: once daily for lisinopril and ramipril, twice daily for enalapril
  • Cost: varies depending on the medication and patient's insurance coverage
  • Patient-specific factors: renal function, pregnancy status, and insurance coverage
  • Side effect profile: similar for all three medications, including dry cough, angioedema, hyperkalemia, and acute kidney injury.

From the FDA Drug Label

Ramipril has been compared with other ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, and thiazide diuretics as monotherapy for hypertension. It was approximately as effective as other ACE inhibitors and as atenolol Ramipril was approximately as effective as other ACE inhibitors and as atenolol.

When selecting an ACE inhibitor for first-line hypertension treatment, the choice between different -prils (ramipril, enalapril, lisinopril) cannot be directly made based on the provided information, as the label only mentions that ramipril is approximately as effective as other ACE inhibitors, without providing a direct comparison between the specific -prils.

  • The effectiveness of ramipril is not influenced by age, sex, or weight.
  • However, ramipril was less effective in blacks than in Caucasians. The FDA drug label does not provide sufficient information to make a direct comparison between ramipril, enalapril, and lisinopril for first-line hypertension treatment 2.

From the Research

Selection Criteria for ACE Inhibitors

When selecting an ACE inhibitor for first-line hypertension treatment, several factors should be considered:

  • The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the ACE inhibitors, such as terminal half-life and route of elimination 3
  • The antihypertensive efficacy of the different ACE inhibitors, which seems to be very similar 3
  • The trough to peak ratio of blood pressure reduction, with some ACE inhibitors like lisinopril, enalapril, and trandolapril having higher ratios 3
  • The ability of ACE inhibitors to reduce left ventricular hypertrophy and improve insulin resistance, which appears to be a class-related effect rather than specific to one ACE inhibitor 3

Comparison of Specific ACE Inhibitors

  • Ramipril, enalapril, and lisinopril are all effective ACE inhibitors with similar pharmacodynamic properties 4, 3
  • Ramipril has been shown to be effective in reducing blood pressure and maintaining satisfactory control during long-term treatment, with a comparable antihypertensive efficacy to enalapril and other ACE inhibitors 4
  • The choice between these ACE inhibitors may depend on individual patient characteristics and the specific clinical context, rather than significant differences in efficacy or safety 3

Clinical Considerations

  • The use of ACE inhibitors as first-line drugs in the management of hypertension is not universally recommended, with some studies suggesting they may be more effective as second-line drugs for specific indications such as congestive heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction 5
  • Combination therapy with an ACE inhibitor and a diuretic may be effective in reducing blood pressure and improving tolerability, and may be considered as a first-line treatment option 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Choosing a first-line drug in the management of elevated blood pressure: what is the evidence? 3: Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors.

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2000

Research

Very-low-dose combination: a first-line choice for the treatment of hypertension?

Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension, 2003

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.