What is the success rate of liver transplants in patients with liver disease?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Liver Transplant Success Rates in Liver Disease

Liver transplantation achieves excellent survival outcomes with current 1-year survival rates of approximately 79-90% across all indications, though success varies significantly by underlying disease etiology and patient characteristics. 1, 2

Overall Survival Rates

Current transplant outcomes demonstrate:

  • 1-year survival: 79-90% across all liver disease indications, with experienced centers achieving rates exceeding 85% 1, 2
  • 3-year survival: 77-85% depending on the underlying condition 1
  • 5-year survival: approximately 70% for most indications 2, 3, 4
  • 10-year survival: exceeds 70% for many disease categories 1, 2

These represent substantial improvement from historical data—1-year survival was only 66% in 1986 compared to current rates approaching 90% 2.

Success Rates by Specific Disease Category

Cholestatic Liver Diseases (Best Outcomes)

Primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis achieve the highest success rates:

  • 1-year survival: >90% 2
  • 3-year survival: approximately 85% 2
  • Primary biliary cirrhosis: 81% 1-year survival 1
  • Primary sclerosing cholangitis: 81% 1-year survival 1

Metabolic Diseases (Excellent Outcomes)

Metabolic liver diseases demonstrate outstanding results:

  • Adults: 1-year survival 88%, 3-year survival 84% 1
  • Children: 1-year survival 94%, 5-year survival 92% 1
  • Wilson's disease: 86% 1-year survival, with 80-90% survival rates reported 1
  • Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency: 78-84% 1-year survival 3

Cirrhosis from Various Etiologies

Viral and alcoholic cirrhosis show good but slightly lower outcomes:

  • Alcoholic liver disease: 80% 1-year survival 1
  • Virus-related cirrhosis: 77% 1-year survival 1
  • Autoimmune cirrhosis: 78% 1-year survival 1
  • Noncholestatic disorders: 1-year 86%, 3-year 77% 2

Acute Liver Failure (Lower Success Rates)

Fulminant hepatic failure represents the most challenging indication:

  • Fulminant hepatic failure: 61% 1-year survival 1
  • Subacute liver failure: 69% 1-year survival 1
  • Historical conservative management: only 7-36% survival without transplant 1

This contrasts dramatically with the 79-87% 1-year survival achieved with transplantation, demonstrating the life-saving benefit in this population 5.

Hepatic Malignancy (Moderate Outcomes)

Liver cancer shows intermediate success rates:

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma: 67% 1-year survival 1
  • Cholangiocarcinoma: 58% 1-year survival 1

Pediatric Conditions

Children achieve excellent outcomes, particularly for biliary atresia:

  • Biliary atresia: 10-year graft survival 73%, patient survival 86% 1
  • Overall pediatric transplants: 1-year survival 80-90% 6

Critical Factors Affecting Success

Age-Related Outcomes

Age influences long-term but not short-term survival:

  • 14-37 years: 1-year 83.3%, 5-year 73.8% 3
  • 38-54 years: 1-year 79.6%, 5-year 69.7% 3
  • 55-63 years: 1-year 76.0%, 5-year 63.0% 3
  • >65 years: comparable short-term outcomes but lower long-term survival 2

Disease Severity at Transplant

Pre-transplant clinical status critically impacts outcomes:

  • ACLF grade 3 with CLIF-C ACLF score <64: 1-year survival 83.9% with transplant versus 7.9% without 1
  • ACLF-3 patients: 5-year survival 67.7%, still excellent despite being lower than ACLF 0-2 1
  • Patients requiring mechanical ventilation or with lactate >4 mmol/L have significantly worse outcomes 1

Long-Term Survival Considerations

Beyond the first year, different mortality patterns emerge:

  • Patients surviving the first year: approximately 90% 1-year survival thereafter, 70% 5-year survival 2
  • 10-year survival: exceeds 70% for many indications 2
  • 20-year survival: approximately 37.6% 7

Late mortality causes differ from early post-transplant deaths:

  • De novo malignancy: cumulative incidence 16-42% by 20 years, with cancer rates 2-4 fold higher than matched controls 2
  • Cardiovascular disease: 9.8% of deaths 7
  • Infection: 11.6% of deaths 7
  • Graft failure: 21.2% of deaths 7

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Early referral is critical—delayed transplant evaluation significantly worsens mortality. 1 Patients should be referred when:

  • Serum bilirubin exceeds 100 μmol/L 1
  • Mayo model score ≥5 or Child-Pugh grade C 1
  • Any evidence of decompensated cirrhosis 1

For acute liver failure, immediate contact with a transplant center is mandatory when prothrombin time <50%. 5 The window for successful transplantation in ACLF-3 is narrow—median time from listing to transplant is only 4-8 days, requiring daily reassessment 1.

Never delay transplant evaluation in decompensated patients, as post-discharge prognosis without transplant is dismal with 1-year survival <25%. 8

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Life Expectancy After Liver Transplantation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Liver transplantation of patients in end-stage cirrhosis.

Bailliere's best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology, 2000

Guideline

Tratamiento de la Falla Hepática Fulminante

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Chemoembolization Contraindications in Liver Disease

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.