What are the types of orchidopexy (surgical procedure to move an undescended testicle into the scrotum)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Types of Orchidopexy

For palpable undescended testes, perform either standard inguinal orchidopexy or single-incision scrotal orchidopexy, while non-palpable intra-abdominal testes require laparoscopic approaches including standard laparoscopic orchidopexy or staged Fowler-Stephens procedures. 1

Standard Approaches for Palpable Testes

Inguinal Orchidopexy (Two-Incision Technique)

  • This is the traditional gold standard approach for most palpable cryptorchid testes, with documented success rates exceeding 96% and testicular atrophy rates below 2%. 1
  • The procedure involves an inguinal incision with mobilization of the spermatic cord and placement of the testis into a scrotal dartos pouch. 1

Single-Incision Scrotal Orchidopexy (Bianchi Approach)

  • For low-lying palpable testes, this primary scrotal approach is equally effective as the two-incision technique and has gained widespread acceptance. 1
  • High scrotal orchidopexy successfully places 87% of palpable maldescended testes in the scrotum through a single high scrotal incision, with 80% showing excellent anatomical and cosmetic results. 2
  • This technique requires less dissection of the inguinal region and provides superior cosmesis compared to traditional inguinal approaches. 2
  • The key advantage is avoiding unnecessary inguinal dissection when the spermatic cord length is adequate, which is the case in most palpable undescended testes. 2

Laparoscopic Orchidopexy for Palpable Testes

  • Recent evidence demonstrates that laparoscopic orchidopexy achieves better final testicular position (89.3% lower position rate) compared to open inguinal orchidopexy (77.9%), with comparable 100% success rates. 3
  • This advantage is particularly pronounced in children aged 3 years or older, where laparoscopic surgery achieved 88.1% lower position rate versus 69.6% with open surgery. 3
  • Laparoscopic approach for palpable testes has minimal complications and no testicular atrophy, making it an emerging alternative to traditional approaches. 3

Approaches for Non-Palpable Intra-Abdominal Testes

Diagnostic Laparoscopy

  • Laparoscopy is mandatory for non-palpable testes to identify testicular vessel status and determine the next course of action, as radiologic imaging lacks both sensitivity and specificity. 1, 4
  • Laparoscopy accurately defines intra-abdominal anatomy in 99% of cases (90 of 91 patients). 4

Standard Laparoscopic Orchidopexy (One-Stage)

  • For intra-abdominal testes with adequate vascular length, standard laparoscopic orchidopexy preserves the testicular vessels and achieves 96% overall success rates. 5
  • This approach is preferred when the testicular vessels can reach the scrotum without tension, avoiding the need for vessel division. 4, 5

Fowler-Stephens Orchidopexy (Staged Procedure)

  • For high intra-abdominal testes where vessels are too short, the two-stage Fowler-Stephens procedure involves laparoscopic clipping of testicular vessels (first stage) followed by orchidopexy 6-12 months later (second stage). 6, 4
  • The staged approach allows collateral blood supply through the vasal artery to develop before moving the testis. 6
  • Two-stage laparoscopic Fowler-Stephens achieves 93.3% success rates with both stages performed laparoscopically, compared to higher atrophy rates when the second stage is performed open. 6, 4
  • The average interval between stages is 9.7 months. 6

One-Stage Fowler-Stephens Orchidopexy

  • One-stage Fowler-Stephens (immediate vessel division and orchidopexy) has significantly higher testicular atrophy rates, with 67% atrophy in some series (2 of 3 testes). 4
  • One-stage Fowler-Stephens should be avoided given the superior outcomes of staged procedures. 4, 5
  • When excluding patients with previous testicular surgery or extensive vasal dissection, staged Fowler-Stephens achieves 96% success rates. 5

Critical Technical Considerations

Avoiding Testicular Atrophy

  • Never perform extensive dissection around the vas deferens, as this almost inevitably leads to testicular atrophy by compromising collateral blood supply. 5
  • Patients with previous testicular surgery have significantly higher atrophy risk and should be counseled accordingly. 5
  • Early spermatic cord control at the internal inguinal ring is mandatory before any testicular manipulation to prevent tumor spread. 7

When to Perform Orchiectomy Instead

  • Orchiectomy is indicated when a normal contralateral testis exists and the patient has very short testicular vessels and vas deferens, dysmorphic or severely hypoplastic testis, or postpubertal age. 1, 8
  • In postpubertal males with cryptorchidism, orchiectomy or biopsy should be strongly considered given limited fertility benefit and elevated cancer risk. 1

Timing Considerations

  • All orchidopexy procedures should be performed by 18 months of age to preserve fertility potential, as progressive germ cell loss accelerates after 15-18 months. 1, 8
  • Prepubertal orchidopexy reduces testicular cancer risk by 2-6 fold compared to postpubertal surgery. 1, 8

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

High scrotal orchidopexy for palpable maldescended testes.

British journal of urology, 1997

Research

Laparoscopic orchidopexy: the easy way to go.

Journal of pediatric surgery, 2009

Guideline

Testicular Biopsy Technique and Fertility Implications in Contralateral Testis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Surgical Management of Undescended Testis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.