Are hysteroscopy with dilation and curettage (D&C) of the uterus, with polypectomy or myomectomy, considered medical procedures or limited conception care benefits for a patient attempting pregnancy with irregular periods and an endometrial polyp?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Medical Procedure Classification

The requested hysteroscopy with D&C and polypectomy should be classified as a medical procedure, not a conception care benefit, because the primary indication is treatment of structural uterine pathology (endometrial polyp and intrauterine synechiae) causing abnormal uterine bleeding—not infertility treatment itself. 1, 2

Rationale for Medical Classification

Primary Medical Indications Present

  • Abnormal uterine bleeding with structural pathology: The patient has irregular periods with spotting for 3 cycles, and imaging demonstrates multiple endometrial filling defects including a 10mm polyp and intrauterine synechiae 2, 3

  • Diagnostic imperative: Blind D&C should be avoided, but hysteroscopy with directed biopsy has the highest diagnostic accuracy for evaluating endometrial pathology and is the standard of care when focal lesions are identified 1, 4, 5

  • Malignancy exclusion: Endometrial polyps in reproductive-age women with abnormal bleeding require histologic examination to exclude premalignant or malignant conditions, which occurs in a small but significant percentage of cases 3, 5

Treatment of Structural Abnormalities

  • Polypectomy indication: Hysteroscopic polypectomy is indicated for symptomatic endometrial polyps causing abnormal uterine bleeding, independent of fertility concerns 3, 4, 5

  • Synechiae treatment: Intrauterine adhesions (synechiae) visualized on imaging require hysteroscopic lysis, which is the standard therapeutic approach for this structural abnormality 6, 7

  • Standard gynecologic care: These procedures represent standard treatment for diagnosed uterine pathology causing symptoms, not experimental or investigational fertility treatments 1, 5

Why This Is NOT Conception Care

Conception Services Definition Analysis

  • The benefit language specifies: "Services designed to assist Members with conception, fertilization or impregnation" - this procedure is designed to treat bleeding and structural pathology, not directly assist with conception [@benefit language provided]

  • Fertility is secondary: While removing polyps and synechiae may improve fertility outcomes, the primary medical indication is treatment of abnormal bleeding and exclusion of malignancy [@6@, 5]

  • Not assisted reproduction: The procedure does not involve handling of eggs or embryos, which the plan specifically defines as requiring conception benefit coverage [@benefit language provided]

Clinical Precedent

  • Standard diagnostic workup: Hysteroscopy with D&C and polypectomy represents the standard diagnostic and therapeutic approach for abnormal uterine bleeding with identified structural lesions, regardless of fertility desires 1, 2, 4

  • Would be performed even without fertility concerns: A postmenopausal woman with the same findings would receive identical treatment, confirming this is medical management of uterine pathology 5

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not conflate fertility preservation with fertility treatment: Treating medical conditions that happen to affect fertility does not automatically make them conception services 1, 5

  • The thyroid issue is a red herring: The instruction to avoid pregnancy until thyroid stabilization further supports that this is medical management, not active conception assistance [@clinical scenario]

  • Timing matters: The patient was "attempting pregnancy" but is now advised to avoid it—the procedure addresses the medical pathology discovered during evaluation, not ongoing fertility treatment [@clinical scenario]

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Indications for Endometrial Biopsy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Removal of uterine polyps: clinical management and surgical approach.

Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society, 2020

Research

Endometrial polyps: diagnosis and treatment options - a review of literature.

Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy, 2021

Research

Endometrial polyps. An evidence-based diagnosis and management guide.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 2021

Research

Therapeutic hysteroscopic procedures.

Fertility and sterility, 1988

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.