What is the initial shock dose in joules for cardiac arrest?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Initial Shock Energy for Cardiac Arrest

For ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT), use 120-200 J for the initial shock with a biphasic defibrillator, or 360 J if using a monophasic defibrillator. 1

Biphasic Defibrillators (Preferred)

Follow the manufacturer's recommended energy dose for your specific device, typically ranging from 120-200 J for the first shock. 1

  • If the manufacturer's recommendation is unknown, use the maximum available energy on the device 1
  • The American Heart Association 2020 guidelines explicitly state biphasic waveforms are preferred over monophasic 1
  • Both biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) and rectilinear biphasic (RLB) waveforms demonstrate 85-98% effectiveness for first shock termination of VF 1

Device-Specific Considerations

  • RLB waveforms typically deliver more energy than selected based on patient impedance, so a 120 J setting may actually deliver approximately 150 J 1
  • Recent evidence from 2025 shows no significant difference in outcomes between initial doses when analyzed per kg of body weight, suggesting the range of 120-200 J is appropriate 2

Monophasic Defibrillators

Deliver 360 J for the initial shock and all subsequent shocks. 1

  • Monophasic waveforms require higher energy than biphasic to achieve equivalent defibrillation success 1, 3
  • The European Resuscitation Council historically recommended starting at 200 J for monophasic, but current consensus favors 360 J 1

Subsequent Shocks

For second and subsequent shocks, use at least the same energy as the first shock, with consideration for escalating to higher energy levels. 1

Escalating vs. Fixed Energy Strategy

  • Either fixed or escalating energy strategies are acceptable based on manufacturer instructions 1
  • Recent 2025 data from China suggests escalating energy (200-300-360 J) may be superior for establishing sustained organized rhythm in refractory VF, particularly after the third shock (35% vs 18% success, p=0.003) 4
  • A 2017 study found first-shock termination rates were similar between low-energy (150 J) and escalating higher-energy protocols (66.67% vs 64.41%), but conversion rates increased substantially at 360 J (38.95%) 5

Practical Algorithm for Subsequent Shocks

  1. If VF persists after first shock: Consider escalating to 300 J, then 360 J for biphasic devices 4
  2. If VF recurs after successful termination: Use the previously successful energy level 1
  3. For manual defibrillators capable of escalating energies: Higher energy for subsequent shocks is reasonable 1

Critical Timing Considerations

Minimize the interval between stopping chest compressions and delivering the shock—even a few seconds matters. 1

  • Resume CPR immediately after shock delivery without checking pulse or rhythm 1
  • Continue CPR for 2 minutes before the next rhythm check 1
  • One provider should resume compressions while the second charges the defibrillator to minimize hands-off time 1

Common Pitfalls

  • Do not deliver stacked shocks (multiple shocks in succession without CPR)—this practice was abandoned because biphasic waveforms have very high first-shock success rates 1
  • Do not check pulse immediately after shock—resume compressions first 1
  • Do not delay defibrillation to perform prolonged CPR unless EMS response time exceeds 4-5 minutes 1
  • Impedance changes minimally between shocks (often <1%), so increasing current requires increasing energy settings, not relying on impedance reduction 6
  • First-shock failure often predicts lower efficacy for subsequent shocks, with 5% of patients accounting for 71% of failed shocks 6

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.