Novel Agents for Prostate Cancer
The most impactful novel agents for prostate cancer include androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (apalutamide, enzalutamide, darolutamide, abiraterone), PARP inhibitors (olaparib for BRCA-mutated disease), radiopharmaceuticals (177Lu-PSMA-617), and chemotherapy agents (docetaxel, cabazitaxel), with treatment selection determined by disease stage, prior therapies, and molecular characteristics. 1
Novel Hormone Agents (Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors)
These represent the most significant therapeutic advance across multiple disease states:
For Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC)
Triplet therapy with ADT + docetaxel + darolutamide is the most effective first-line regimen, achieving a 23-month overall survival gain (OS HR: 0.68) 2. This combination is particularly recommended for fit patients with de novo metastatic disease, especially those with multiple bone metastases (>3) or visceral metastases 1.
Alternative triplet therapy options include:
- ADT + docetaxel + abiraterone + prednisone (ESMO-MCBS score: 4) 1
- ADT + docetaxel + apalutamide (median OS gain: 16.4 months, OS HR: 0.75) 1
For patients unable to tolerate triplet therapy, doublet regimens with novel hormone agents plus ADT are effective:
- ADT + abiraterone + prednisone (median OS: 53.3 months vs 36.5 months with ADT alone, HR: 0.66) 3
- ADT + apalutamide (ESMO-MCBS score: 4) 1
- ADT + enzalutamide (4-year OS gain: 14%, OS HR: 0.66-0.67) 1
For Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (nmCRPC)
Three agents significantly delay metastasis and improve survival in high-risk nmCRPC:
- Apalutamide + ADT: Median metastasis-free survival (MFS) gain of 24.3 months (MFS HR: 0.28), with 14-month OS gain (OS HR: 0.78) 1
- Enzalutamide + ADT: MFS gain of 21.9 months (MFS HR: 0.29), with 10.7-month OS gain (OS HR: 0.73) 1
- Darolutamide + ADT: MFS gain of 22.0 months (MFS HR: 0.41), with 6% 3-year OS gain (OS HR: 0.69) 1
For Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Enzalutamide demonstrates superior efficacy among novel hormone agents in chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC, with a 4.8-month OS gain (HR: 0.71) compared to placebo 1, 4. Abiraterone + prednisone is the second-most effective option (OS HR: 0.78) 4.
In post-docetaxel mCRPC, both agents provide survival benefits:
- Enzalutamide: 4.8-month OS gain (HR: 0.73) with improved quality of life 1
- Abiraterone + prednisone: 4.6-month OS gain (HR: 0.74) 1
Targeted Therapies: PARP Inhibitors
Olaparib is the first FDA-approved targeted therapy for prostate cancer, specifically for patients with mCRPC harboring BRCA1/2 or other homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene mutations 1.
Key efficacy data:
- In BRCA1/2-mutated mCRPC after prior novel hormone agent: OS improvement from 14.7 to 19.1 months (HR: 0.69), with benefit predominantly in BRCA-altered patients 1
- PFS gain of 3.8 months (HR: 0.25-0.47) 1
Critical caveat: Olaparib should only be used after progression on androgen receptor pathway inhibitors in patients with confirmed BRCA1/2 alterations, as the benefit is limited to this molecular subset 1, 2.
Radiopharmaceuticals
177Lu-PSMA-617 represents a breakthrough for heavily pretreated mCRPC, approved for patients with PSMA-positive disease who have received both a novel androgen receptor axis inhibitor and taxane chemotherapy 1.
Efficacy outcomes:
- OS gain of 4.0 months (HR: 0.62,95% CI 0.52-0.74) 1
- Radiographic PFS improvement from 3.4 to 8.7 months (HR: 0.40) 1
Important selection criteria: Requires PSMA expression on PET imaging without PSMA non-expressing lesions 1. Higher toxicity profile with 52.7% grade 3+ adverse events versus 38% with standard care 1.
Chemotherapy Agents
Docetaxel
Docetaxel remains foundational across multiple disease states 5:
- In mHSPC: Combined with ADT and novel hormone agents in triplet therapy (see above) 1, 2
- In mCRPC (chemotherapy-naïve): 2.9-month OS gain as monotherapy (HR: 0.79) with improved quality of life 1
- FDA-approved dose: 75 mg/m² IV every 3 weeks for prostate cancer 5
Critical warning: The 100 mg/m² dose in previously treated patients is associated with increased hematologic toxicity, infection, and treatment-related mortality 5.
Cabazitaxel
Cabazitaxel is the preferred chemotherapy after docetaxel failure, particularly when patients progress within 12 months of novel hormone agent therapy 1.
Efficacy in post-docetaxel mCRPC:
- Versus mitoxantrone: 2.4-month OS gain (HR: 0.70) 1
- Versus abiraterone/enzalutamide (CARD trial): 2.6-month OS gain (HR: 0.64), with 4.3-month PFS gain (HR: 0.54) 1
Treatment Sequencing Algorithm
For Newly Diagnosed mHSPC:
- Fit patients with high-volume disease: ADT + docetaxel + darolutamide (or abiraterone) 1, 2
- Patients unable to tolerate triplet therapy: ADT + novel hormone agent (abiraterone, apalutamide, or enzalutamide) 1
- Vulnerable patients: ADT alone only if cannot tolerate treatment intensification 1
For nmCRPC at High Risk of Metastasis:
- Any of the three agents (apalutamide, enzalutamide, or darolutamide) + ADT, with apalutamide showing the longest MFS gain 1
For mCRPC Progression:
- First-line (chemotherapy-naïve): Enzalutamide or abiraterone + prednisone 1, 4
- After novel hormone agent + docetaxel:
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
Cross-resistance between novel hormone agents is significant: Sequential use of abiraterone after enzalutamide (or vice versa) shows limited benefit, with only 36% achieving any PSA decline and median PFS of 3.4 months 6. Avoid sequential novel hormone agents in the same disease state 6.
Molecular testing is essential: BRCA1/2 and HRR gene mutation testing should be performed in all mCRPC patients to identify candidates for olaparib 1, 2. PSMA PET imaging is required before 177Lu-PSMA-617 1.
Hepatotoxicity monitoring is critical: Docetaxel is contraindicated in patients with bilirubin >ULN or AST/ALT >1.5× ULN with alkaline phosphatase >2.5× ULN 5. Monitor liver function before each cycle 5.
Quality of life considerations vary: Enzalutamide improved QOL in post-docetaxel mCRPC 1, while apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide in nmCRPC showed no QOL benefit or only exploratory endpoints 1. This should factor into shared decision-making 2.
Clinical trial participation should be strongly encouraged given the rapidly evolving treatment landscape and need to identify optimal sequences 2.