Is the risk of aortic aneurysm associated with fluoroquinolone (antibiotic) use dose-dependent?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Is Aortic Aneurysm Risk from Fluoroquinolones Dose-Dependent?

Yes, the risk of aortic aneurysm and dissection from fluoroquinolone use is dose-dependent, with risk increasing proportionally with both cumulative dose and duration of therapy.

Evidence for Dose-Dependent Relationship

The most definitive evidence comes from a large Korean population study demonstrating that the risk of aortic aneurysm and dissection positively correlates with both cumulative dose and duration of fluoroquinolone therapy (p < 0.001) 1. This represents the strongest direct evidence of a dose-response relationship.

Time-Dependent Risk Pattern

The dose-dependent nature manifests through temporal patterns:

  • Within 60 days of use: Risk increases substantially with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.53 (95% CI: 1.46-1.62) 1
  • Within 1 year of use: Risk remains elevated but attenuates to an adjusted odds ratio of 1.10 (95% CI: 1.07-1.14) 1
  • Current use (within 60 days): Rate ratio of 2.43 (95% CI: 1.83-3.22) compared to non-users 2
  • Past use (61-365 days): Attenuated but persistent risk with rate ratio of 1.48 (95% CI: 1.18-1.86) 2

This temporal gradient strongly supports a dose-dependent mechanism, where more recent and cumulative exposure carries higher risk.

Absolute Risk Quantification

The absolute increase in risk provides clinical context for the dose-dependent relationship:

  • 82 additional cases of aortic aneurysm or dissection per 1 million treatment episodes within 60 days (95% CI: 15-181) 3
  • Incidence rate: 1.9 cases per 1000 person-years among fluoroquinolone users versus 1.2 cases per 1000 person-years among macrolide users 4
  • Overall hazard ratio: 1.34 (95% CI: 1.17-1.54) for fluoroquinolones versus macrolides in a large US population 4

Duration-Specific Risk

Sensitivity analyses demonstrate that exposure duration of 7-14 days increases risk with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.47 (95% CI: 1.26-1.71) 4, confirming that even relatively short courses carry measurable dose-dependent risk.

Clinical Guideline Recognition

The 2022 ACC/AHA guidelines acknowledge that fluoroquinolone use is associated with increased risk of aortic aneurysm and dissection, though they note the pathways are unknown 5. The 2024 ESC guidelines go further, stating that fluoroquinolones are generally discouraged for patients with existing aortic aneurysms, though they may be considered if there is compelling clinical indication and no reasonable alternative 5.

Agent-Specific Considerations

Different fluoroquinolones show varying risk profiles:

  • Ciprofloxacin: Adjusted hazard ratio of 1.26 (95% CI: 1.07-1.49) 4
  • Levofloxacin: Adjusted hazard ratio of 1.44 (95% CI: 1.19-1.52) 4
  • All fluoroquinolones: Associated with aortic aneurysm in pharmacovigilance data, with oral administration more likely to produce adverse events 6

Mechanism Supporting Dose-Dependence

While the exact pathways remain under investigation 5, the dose-dependent relationship aligns with fluoroquinolones' known effects on collagen degradation 2. The 2011 PM&R guidelines note that fluoroquinolones inhibit osteoblast cell growth and extracellular matrix mineralization in a dose-dependent manner 5, suggesting similar mechanisms may affect aortic connective tissue.

Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume brief courses are safe: Even 7-14 day exposures carry significantly elevated risk 4
  • Do not ignore cumulative exposure: Patients with multiple fluoroquinolone courses face compounding risk 1
  • Do not overlook the 60-day window: The highest risk period extends well beyond active treatment 3, 1, 2
  • Do not use in patients with existing aortic disease: The 2024 ESC guidelines specifically discourage this practice 5

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.