What are the recommendations for a 30-year-old female who uses hormonal birth control and vapes regarding clotting risk?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Vaping and Hormonal Birth Control: Clotting Risk Assessment

A 30-year-old female who vapes should not use combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) due to significantly elevated thrombotic risk, and should instead be offered progestin-only contraceptive methods.

Understanding the Compounded Risk

The combination of vaping/smoking with combined hormonal contraceptives creates a multiplicative thrombotic risk that is clinically unacceptable:

  • Women who use CHCs and smoke have a 10-fold increased risk of myocardial infarction compared to non-smoking non-users 1
  • The risk of stroke increases nearly 3-fold in CHC users who smoke 1
  • Venous thromboembolism risk is approximately 4-fold higher with CHC use alone, and this is compounded by smoking status 1, 2
  • Current CHC users over age 35 who smoke have a 10-fold increased VTE risk compared to younger non-smoking users 1

While this patient is 30 years old, the thrombotic risk from the combination of nicotine exposure (whether from cigarettes or vaping) and estrogen-containing contraceptives remains clinically significant at any age over 35, and the risk trajectory begins in the early 30s 1, 3.

Mechanism of Increased Risk

Combined hormonal contraceptives create a hypercoagulable state through multiple mechanisms:

  • Increased plasma fibrinogen and coagulation factors (especially factors VII and X) 4
  • Decreased antithrombin III, the primary inhibitor of coagulation 4
  • Enhanced platelet aggregation 4
  • Cigarette smoking is specifically identified as a contributor to breakthrough bleeding and thrombotic complications in CDC guidelines, indicating recognized vascular effects 5

Recommended Contraceptive Alternatives

Progestin-only contraceptives (POCs) are the appropriate choice for this patient and include:

  • Progestin-only pills (POPs): No increased VTE risk demonstrated 6
  • Etonogestrel implant: Minimal VTE risk (RR 1.4) 2, 6
  • Levonorgestrel IUD: No increased VTE risk 2, 6
  • Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA): Some evidence suggests modest VTE increase (RR 3.6), but substantially less than CHCs 2, 6

POCs are associated with substantially less cardiovascular risk than CHCs in women with cardiovascular risk factors 1.

Clinical Action Steps

  1. Discontinue combined hormonal contraceptives immediately if currently in use 1
  2. Counsel the patient on smoking/vaping cessation as the definitive risk reduction strategy 1
  3. Initiate a progestin-only method based on patient preference and medical eligibility 1, 6
  4. Monitor blood pressure if continuing any hormonal method, as hypertension further compounds risk 1

Critical Caveat

If the patient has additional cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, obesity, thrombogenic mutations, personal or family history of VTE), even progestin-only methods require careful consideration, with DMPA potentially avoided in favor of POPs, implants, or LNG-IUD 6. The presence of poorly controlled hypertension with CHC use is associated with 3-fold increased MI risk, 3-fold increased ischemic stroke risk, and 15-fold increased hemorrhagic stroke risk 1.

References

Research

Cardiovascular risk and the use of oral contraceptives.

Neuro endocrinology letters, 2013

Research

Risks of oral contraceptive use in women over 35.

The Journal of reproductive medicine, 1993

Research

Coagulation effects of oral contraception.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1987

Guideline

Breakthrough Bleeding with Continuous Combined Oral Contraceptive Use

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.