What is Urinalysis MSCC (Mid-Stream Catch Culture)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

What is Urinalysis MSCC?

MSCC stands for Midstream Clean-Catch collection, a urine specimen collection technique where the patient cleanses the perineal area, begins urinating into the toilet, then collects 10-20 mL of the midstream portion in a sterile container without stopping the urine flow. 1, 2

Collection Technique Details

For Female Patients

  • Cleanse the perineal area with soap and water or antiseptic wipes, wiping front to back with a fresh wipe for each stroke 2
  • Separate the labia and keep them separated throughout the entire collection process 2
  • Begin urinating into the toilet, then without stopping the stream, collect 10-20 mL of midstream urine in the sterile container 2

For Male Patients

  • Cleanse the glans penis with an antiseptic pad before voiding 1, 2
  • Retract the foreskin if uncircumcised 2
  • Void the first 100-200 mL into the toilet, then collect 10-20 mL of midstream urine 1, 2

Contamination Rates and Diagnostic Accuracy

MSCC with cleansing significantly reduces contamination compared to collection without cleansing (7.8% vs 23.9% contamination rate). 1, 2

Comparison to Other Collection Methods

  • MSCC with cleansing: 7.8-27% contamination rate 1, 2
  • MSCC without cleansing: 23.9-32% contamination rate 1
  • Sterile urine bag: 44-68% contamination rate 1, 2, 3
  • Catheterization: 4.7-12% contamination rate 1, 2
  • Suprapubic aspiration: 1% contamination rate (lowest) 2, 3

Diagnostic Performance in Children

When compared to suprapubic aspiration (the gold standard), MSCC demonstrates:

  • Sensitivity: 71-89% 1
  • Specificity: 80-95% 1

Clinical Context and Limitations

Despite widespread recommendation in guidelines, recent research shows that MSCC may not be as effective as traditionally believed. Multiple studies from 2000-2023 found no significant difference in contamination rates between MSCC with cleansing versus simple random void collection in symptomatic women (contamination rates of 28.6% vs 31.5%, p=0.65). 4, 5

Important Caveats

  • Written instructions alone do not reduce contamination rates (51.98% with posted instructions vs 51.99% without, p=0.99) 6
  • Mobile app-based instructions similarly show no benefit (38% contamination rate in both groups) 7
  • Novel collection devices (funnels) and silver-impregnated wipes do not reduce contamination compared to standard technique 8

When MSCC is Appropriate vs When to Use Invasive Methods

For febrile infants <24 months requiring immediate antimicrobial therapy, catheterization or suprapubic aspiration (not MSCC) is recommended due to superior sensitivity (95%) and specificity (99%). 2, 3

Use MSCC for:

  • Toilet-trained children and adults with suspected UTI 1, 2
  • Outpatient settings where invasive collection is not feasible 2

Use catheterization or suprapubic aspiration for:

  • Febrile infants requiring immediate treatment 2, 3
  • When MSCC results show mixed flora and clinical suspicion remains high 3, 9
  • Non-toilet-trained children when definitive diagnosis is needed 2

Specimen Handling After Collection

  • Refrigerate at 4°C and deliver to laboratory within 4 hours 1, 2
  • Check temperature within 4 minutes of collection (should be 90-100°F or 32-38°C) 2
  • Document appearance and color immediately 2

Interpreting MSCC Results

Contamination is defined as mixed growth of 2 or more organisms or growth of ≥10^5 CFU/mL of non-uropathogens. 1, 3

Signs of Contamination

  • Multiple bacterial species (mixed flora) 3, 9
  • Presence of epithelial cells alongside bacteria 3, 9
  • Growth of skin flora (coagulase-negative staphylococci) at low counts 9

When Contamination Occurs

  • Do not treat based on contaminated cultures 9
  • Recollect using a more reliable method if clinical suspicion remains high 3, 9
  • Heavy mixed growth may mask a true pathogen, requiring recollection 3, 9

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Proper Urine Sample Collection Techniques

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Clinical Significance of Mixed Flora on Urine Culture

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Outpatient urine culture: does collection technique matter?

Archives of internal medicine, 2000

Guideline

Urine Contamination and Clinical Decision-Making

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.