What is the evidence for using Citicoline (Cytidine diphosphate-choline) in acute stroke management?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Citicoline for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Citicoline is not recommended for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke based on high-quality evidence from multiple randomized controlled trials, including the definitive ICTUS trial, which showed no benefit in improving 90-day outcomes. 1, 2

Guideline Position

The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association explicitly states that citicoline cannot be recommended for acute ischemic stroke treatment (Grade A recommendation). 1, 2 This recommendation is based on:

  • The International Citicoline Trial on Acute Stroke (ICTUS), the largest and most definitive trial with 2,298 patients with moderate to severe ischemic stroke, found no difference in 90-day global outcomes between citicoline and placebo (OR 1.03,95% CI 0.86-1.25, p=0.364). 1, 2

  • Multiple earlier clinical trials testing citicoline as a neuroprotective agent produced disappointing or negative results, with some showing worse outcomes in treated patients. 3

  • The 2013 AHA/ASA guidelines note that although a preliminary study suggested benefit, a subsequent large trial was negative. 3

Conflicting Evidence to Consider

While guidelines are clear against citicoline use, some post-hoc and pooled analyses suggest potential benefit in specific subgroups:

  • A patient-level pooled analysis of four trials (1,372 patients) showed 25.2% recovery in citicoline-treated patients versus 20.2% in placebo (OR 1.33,95% CI 1.10-1.62, p=0.0034) when started within 24 hours. 4

  • A 2016 meta-analysis found benefit in patients not treated with rtPA (OR 1.63,95% CI 1.18-2.24), suggesting the effect may be diluted when combined with thrombolysis. 5

  • A Korean surveillance study of 4,191 patients showed improvements in functional outcomes, particularly with doses ≥2000 mg/day. 6

However, these post-hoc findings do not override the negative results from the prospectively designed, adequately powered ICTUS trial, which represents the highest quality evidence. 1

What to Use Instead

Focus on proven interventions with established mortality and morbidity benefits:

  • IV rtPA within 3-4.5 hours of symptom onset for eligible patients (Grade 1A for <3 hours, Grade 2C for 3-4.5 hours). 2

  • Endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusions within appropriate time windows. 2

  • Aspirin 160-325 mg within 24-48 hours for patients not receiving thrombolysis. 3, 2

  • Admission to specialized stroke units with coordinated interdisciplinary care. 2

  • Blood pressure management and control of physiological parameters. 1, 2

Clinical Pitfall

Do not delay proven therapies (imaging, rtPA evaluation, thrombectomy assessment) to administer unproven neuroprotective agents like citicoline. 2 Time is brain—every minute counts for interventions with demonstrated efficacy.

References

Guideline

Citicoline in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Acute Stroke Management Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Citicoline for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Formal Meta-analysis of Randomized, Double-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Trials.

Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association, 2016

Research

Efficacy and safety of oral citicoline in acute ischemic stroke: drug surveillance study in 4,191 cases.

Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology, 2009

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.