Suppressive Therapy for HSV-2 with ≥6 Episodes Per Year
For patients with HSV-2 experiencing 6 or more recurrences per year, daily suppressive antiviral therapy is the recommended treatment strategy, with valacyclovir 1 gram once daily as the preferred first-line regimen. 1, 2
Primary Treatment Regimens
Daily suppressive therapy reduces recurrence frequency by ≥75% in patients with frequent outbreaks (≥6 episodes per year) and should be offered to all qualifying patients. 3, 1, 2
Preferred options include:
- Valacyclovir 1,000 mg orally once daily – This is the most convenient dosing option with documented safety for 1 year of continuous use in immunocompetent patients 1, 2, 4
- Valacyclovir 500 mg orally once daily – Alternative for patients with <10 recurrences per year, though less effective for those with ≥10 episodes annually 3, 1, 4
- Acyclovir 400 mg orally twice daily – Alternative option with documented safety for up to 6 years of continuous use 3, 1, 2
- Famciclovir 250 mg orally twice daily – Another effective alternative for chronic suppressive therapy 3, 1, 2
Dosing Considerations Based on Recurrence Frequency
The choice between valacyclovir 500 mg versus 1,000 mg daily depends on annual recurrence rate:
- For patients with 6-9 recurrences per year: Valacyclovir 500 mg once daily is effective 1, 2, 4
- For patients with ≥10 recurrences per year: Valacyclovir 1,000 mg once daily or 250 mg twice daily provides superior suppression, as the 500 mg once-daily dose appears less effective in this population 3, 1, 2
Additional Benefits Beyond Recurrence Prevention
Suppressive therapy provides multiple clinical advantages:
- Reduces asymptomatic viral shedding, though does not eliminate it completely 3, 1, 2
- Decreases transmission risk to sexual partners by 48%, with a 75% reduction in clinical disease among susceptible partners 5, 6
- Improves quality of life by preventing physical discomfort, psychological distress, and social impact of recurrent outbreaks 2, 7
Duration and Reassessment Strategy
After 1 year of continuous suppressive therapy, discontinuation should be discussed with the patient to assess:
- Current psychological adjustment to genital herpes 3, 1, 2
- Current recurrence rate, as frequency of recurrences decreases over time in many patients 3, 1
- Patient preference for continuing versus stopping therapy 1, 2
Safety Profile and Monitoring
- No clinically significant acyclovir resistance has emerged in immunocompetent patients receiving suppressive therapy 3, 2
- No laboratory monitoring is needed unless the patient has substantial renal impairment 2
- Medications are occasionally associated with mild nausea or headache 2
- Valacyclovir may be given without regard to meals 4
Critical Counseling Points
Patients must understand that suppressive therapy:
- Does not eradicate the latent virus 1, 2
- Does not completely prevent transmission—asymptomatic viral shedding can still occur 3, 1, 2
- Requires continued safer sex practices, including condom use with new or uninfected partners 3, 1
- Requires abstinence from sexual activity when lesions or prodromal symptoms are present 3, 1
Special Populations
For HIV-infected patients with CD4+ count ≥100 cells/mm³:
- Valacyclovir 500 mg twice daily (not once daily) is required for adequate suppression 1, 2, 4
- The once-daily 500 mg dose used in immunocompetent patients is insufficient for HIV-infected individuals 2
Management of Treatment Failure
If lesions do not begin to resolve within 7-10 days of therapy, suspect acyclovir resistance:
- Obtain viral culture and perform susceptibility testing if virus is isolated 2
- IV foscarnet is the treatment of choice for proven or suspected acyclovir-resistant HSV 1, 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not prescribe valacyclovir 500 mg once daily for HIV-infected patients—they require 500 mg twice daily 2
- Do not use topical acyclovir—it has substantially lower effectiveness compared to oral therapy 1
- Do not prescribe valacyclovir 8 grams per day—this dose is associated with hemolytic uremic syndrome/thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in immunocompromised patients 1