What is the recommended length of coracoid (coracoid process) needed for a Latarjet procedure?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Coracoid Length Requirements for Latarjet Procedure

A minimum coracoid length of approximately 17-22 mm is needed for the Latarjet procedure, though the specific requirement depends on the size of glenoid bone loss and the fixation method chosen.

Anatomic Dimensions of the Coracoid

  • The mean usable coracoid length ranges from 16.8-23.9 mm across anatomic studies, with significant individual variation 1, 2, 3
  • Coracoid width averages 13.6-15.0 mm and thickness averages 8.6-10.5 mm 1, 2, 3
  • Approximately 46% of patients have a coracoid length less than 25 mm, making preoperative CT assessment critical 1

Matching Coracoid Length to Glenoid Defect

The adequacy of coracoid length depends on the extent of glenoid bone loss:

  • For 20-25% glenoid bone loss: The coracoid graft successfully restores glenoid anatomy in 96% of cases 1
  • For 30% glenoid bone loss: The coracoid adequately restores anatomy in only 79.2% of cases, indicating this may represent the upper limit for standard Latarjet 1
  • The radius of curvature (ROC) of the coracoid undersurface (mean 13.6 mm) matches the intact glenoid ROC (mean 13.8 mm) in the congruent-arc technique, though substantial variation exists with up to 45% of specimens showing ROC mismatch 2, 3

Fixation Method Considerations

The choice of fixation implant significantly impacts the "safe distance" from the coracoid osteotomy:

  • 4.5 mm screws: Safe positioning achieved in only 56% of cases 1
  • 3.75 mm screws: Safe positioning in 85% of cases 1
  • 3.5 mm screws: Safe positioning in 87% of cases 1
  • 2.8 mm button fixation: Safe positioning in 98% of cases, providing the greatest safety margin 1, 3

The "safe distance" is defined as at least equal to the implant diameter between the fixation device and the coracoid osteotomy edge 1.

Critical Preoperative Planning

CT-based preoperative planning is essential to determine:

  • Precise coracoid dimensions (length, width, thickness) 4, 5
  • Extent of glenoid bone loss 4
  • Optimal screw length to avoid suprascapular nerve injury (reported in up to 6% of cases) or bone block non-union (up to 20% of cases) 5
  • Whether the available coracoid length is adequate for the planned reconstruction 1, 3

Modified Technique for Limited Coracoid Length

  • The "LUtarjet" technique with limit unique coracoid osteotomy preserves the coracoacromial arch while using individualized flexible arthroscopic suture button fixation 4
  • This approach allows for coracoid osteotomy as small as 8-10 mm with subscapularis splitting, potentially useful when coracoid length is limited 4

Key Clinical Pitfalls

  • Population-specific variations exist: Indian populations show significantly smaller coracoid dimensions, with 2.7 mm screws being the safest option in 82% of shoulders 3
  • Without CT planning, screws are frequently too long (mean 4.83 mm beyond posterior cortex for the inferior screw), increasing nerve injury risk 5
  • The congruent-arc technique can reconstitute greater glenoid defects than the classic Latarjet orientation, but requires matching ROC between coracoid and glenoid 2

References

Research

An anatomic, computed tomographic assessment of the coracoid process with special reference to the congruent-arc latarjet procedure.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association, 2011

Research

Preoperative CT planning of screw length in arthroscopic Latarjet.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2018

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.