Initial Treatment Approach for Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)
The initial treatment of MDS is determined by risk stratification using IPSS or IPSS-R scoring systems, which divides patients into lower-risk and higher-risk groups, with all patients receiving supportive care as the foundation of management. 1, 2
Risk Stratification Framework
Risk assessment using IPSS or IPSS-R is the critical first step that determines the entire treatment pathway (Category 2A recommendation). 1 The IPSS-R categorization is preferred when available due to more accurate risk stratification. 1
Lower-risk patients include those with:
- IPSS: Low and Intermediate-1 1
- IPSS-R: Very low, low, and intermediate 1
- WPSS: Very low, low, and intermediate 1
Higher-risk patients include those with:
- IPSS: Intermediate-2 and high 1
- IPSS-R: Intermediate, high, and very high 1
- WPSS: High and very high 1
Critical caveat: IPSS-R intermediate patients may be managed as either risk group depending on age, performance status, serum ferritin levels, and serum LDH levels. 1 Additionally, intermediate-risk patients who fail lower-risk therapies should transition to higher-risk treatment strategies. 1
Universal Supportive Care (All Patients)
Every patient with MDS requires supportive care regardless of risk category. 1 This includes:
- RBC transfusions for symptomatic anemia (generally leukocyte-reduced), typically at hemoglobin thresholds of at least 8 g/dL, higher in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities 1, 2
- Platelet transfusions for severe thrombocytopenia or thrombocytopenic bleeding 1
- Clinical monitoring to assess blood count stability over several months to detect disease progression or transformation to AML 1
- Quality-of-life assessment addressing physical, functional, emotional, spiritual, and social domains 1
Treatment of Lower-Risk MDS
The therapeutic goal for lower-risk patients is hematologic improvement rather than altering disease natural history. 1
For Anemia WITHOUT del(5q):
First-line: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) 1, 2, 3
- Weekly doses of 30,000-80,000 units of recombinant EPO or 150-300 μg darbepoetin 1, 2
- Response rates of 40-60% when baseline serum EPO is <200-500 U/L and transfusion requirement is absent or limited 1
- G-CSF can be added to improve efficacy 1
- Responses occur within 8-12 weeks; median duration of response is 20-24 months 1
- ESAs are an independent favorable prognostic factor for survival 1
For Anemia WITH del(5q):
First-line: Lenalidomide 1, 2, 3
- Initial dose: 10 mg daily for 21 days out of 28 days 1
- Response rate: 60-65% with median RBC transfusion independence of 2-2.5 years 1, 2
- Cytogenetic response achieved in 50-75% (including 30-45% complete cytogenetic response) 1
- Important warning: TP53 mutations (present in ~20% of del(5q) MDS) confer resistance to lenalidomide and higher risk of AML progression 1
For Severe Thrombocytopenia:
- TPO receptor agonists (romiplostim, eltrombopag) are recommended, but only in patients with marrow blasts <5% 2
- Broad-spectrum antibiotics if fever develops 1
- Short-term G-CSF for symptomatic neutropenia 1
Second-line Options After ESA/Lenalidomide Failure:
- Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) ± cyclosporine for selected patients (generally ≤60 years with ≤5% marrow blasts, hypocellular marrows, HLA-DR15 positivity, or PNH clone positivity) 1
- Azacitidine (if approved in this setting) 1
- Lenalidomide ± EPO for non-del(5q) patients 1
- Clinical trials 1
Treatment of Higher-Risk MDS
The therapeutic goal for higher-risk patients is to alter disease natural history and prolong survival. 1
For Transplant Candidates:
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only potentially curative therapy and should be considered for all higher-risk patients <70 years without major comorbidities who have a donor. 1, 2, 3
Options include:
- Immediate allo-HCT 1
- Bridging therapy (azacitidine, decitabine, or high-intensity chemotherapy) followed by HCT to reduce marrow blasts to acceptable levels 1
For Non-Transplant Candidates:
First-line: Hypomethylating agents 1, 2, 3
Azacitidine (FDA-approved for all MDS subtypes and IPSS risk groups) 4
- Dose: 75 mg/m² daily for 7 days subcutaneously or intravenously 2, 4
- Repeat cycle every 28 days 4
- Continue treatment as long as patient benefits 4
- Response should be evaluated after at least 6 cycles 1
Decitabine (FDA-approved for all MDS subtypes and IPSS risk groups) 5
- Three-day regimen: 15 mg/m² IV over 3 hours every 8 hours for 3 days, repeat every 6 weeks 5
- Five-day regimen: 20 mg/m² IV over 1 hour daily for 5 days, repeat every 4 weeks 5
After HCT Relapse:
Special Populations
Therapy-related MDS: Most patients have poorer prognoses with substantial proportion having poor-risk cytogenetics; these patients are generally managed as higher-risk disease regardless of IPSS score. 1
Patients with monosomy 7: Should be treated in the intermediate-2/high prognostic category even if otherwise lower-risk. 1
Critical Monitoring Requirements
- Complete blood counts and platelet counts should be performed frequently during treatment 4
- Monitor for hematologic response using standardized International Working Group (IWG) response criteria 1
- Assess for renal toxicity, particularly with hypomethylating agents 4
- Monitor for tumor lysis syndrome risk, especially with hypomethylating agents 4
- Evaluate transfusion requirements and serum ferritin for iron overload 1, 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not substitute oral azacitidine for azacitidine injection—they have different indications and dosing regimens. 4 The evidence and FDA approval discussed here applies only to injectable formulations.
Do not delay risk stratification. Treatment decisions cannot be made without proper IPSS or IPSS-R scoring, which requires bone marrow evaluation with cytogenetics and blast percentage. 1
Do not use TPO receptor agonists in patients with ≥5% marrow blasts due to theoretical concerns about promoting leukemic progression. 2
Do not give up on hypomethylating agents too early. Responses may take up to 6 cycles of azacitidine to manifest; premature discontinuation is a common error. 1