What are the different classifications of grafts?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Classification of Grafts

Grafts are classified into four main categories based on their origin: autografts (from the same individual), allografts (from a different individual of the same species), xenografts (from a different species), and alloplasts (synthetic materials). 1

Primary Classification System by Origin

Autografts (Autologous/Autogenous Grafts)

  • Tissue transferred from one site to another within the same individual 1, 2
  • Represents the "gold standard" for bone grafting due to possessing all three critical properties: osteoconduction, osteoinduction, and osteogenesis 3
  • Contains viable osteoprogenitor cells that directly contribute to new bone formation 3
  • For bone applications, can be harvested as block grafts or particulate grafts from sites like mandibular symphysis, ramus, retromolar area, or iliac crest 1
  • Main disadvantage is donor site morbidity, with 34% of patients reporting iliac crest harvest pain on independent assessment 1

Allografts (Allogeneic Grafts)

  • Tissue transferred between genetically different individuals of the same species 4, 2
  • Lacks osteogenic properties (no viable cells) but retains some osteoinductive potential, particularly with demineralized bone matrix 3
  • Associated with higher non-union rates and significantly increased graft collapse (30%) compared to autograft (5%) in multiple-level procedures 3
  • Smoking has more significant negative impact on fusion success with allograft versus autograft 3
  • Common forms include freeze-dried bone allografts (FDBAs) and demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts (DFDBAs) 5
  • Healing time for allograft block grafts is 5-6 months before implant placement 1

Xenografts (Xenogeneic Grafts)

  • Tissue from one species implanted into a member of a different species 6, 2
  • Commonly bovine or porcine materials used in clinical practice 1, 5
  • Nonresorbable properties due to sintering technique and heating during processing, which changes hydroxyapatite dissolution rate and prevents osteoclastic resorption 5
  • Often combined with allografts in 50/50 or 70/30 ratios for various grafting procedures 5
  • Provides osteoconductive scaffold but lacks osteoinductive and osteogenic properties 7

Alloplasts (Synthetic Grafts)

  • Synthetic materials including calcium phosphate salts, hydroxyapatite, β-tricalcium phosphate, and wollanosite 1
  • Provide osteoconductive scaffold for bone growth 1
  • Generally not recommended for vascular applications due to infection risks 1

Secondary Classification Systems

By Thickness (Skin Grafts)

  • Split-thickness (partial) grafts: Further divided into thin, intermediate, and thick varieties; usually take well 6
  • Full-thickness grafts: Only take if relatively small 6

By Form (Bone Grafts)

  • Block grafts: Solid pieces requiring 4-6 months healing for autografts, 5-6 months for allografts, with expected lateral bone gain of 4-6 mm 1
  • Particulate grafts: Morselized bone used alone or combined with other materials 1

By Biological Properties (Bone Grafts)

  • Osteogenic: Contains living cells capable of forming bone (autografts only) 3, 7
  • Osteoinductive: Contains growth factors that induce bone formation (autografts, some allografts like demineralized bone matrix) 3, 7
  • Osteoconductive: Provides scaffold for bone growth (all graft types) 7

Special Graft Categories for Vascular Applications

For Infected Vascular Graft Reconstruction

  • Rifampin-bonded or silver-coated synthetic grafts: Preferable for patients unable to tolerate prolonged surgery, though less resistant to infection than biological grafts 1
  • Cryopreserved or fresh arterial allografts: Associated with lower infection rates than synthetic materials but subject to graft degeneration over time 1
  • Autogenous superficial femoral venous grafts: Highest long-term patency due to lack of HLA class II antigen expression, but requires prolonged operative time and carries risk of venous stasis morbidity 1

Critical Clinical Distinctions

Graft Acceptance

  • Only autografts permanently take and integrate 6
  • Allografts and xenografts provoke immunological responses leading to rejection unless in specific applications (e.g., temporary coverage in burns or as scaffold materials) 6, 4
  • Isografts (syngeneic grafts between genetically identical individuals) are readily accepted 4

For Peyronie's Disease Surgery

Grafts classified into four types for tunical lengthening procedures 1:

  • Type 1 (Autografts): Dermis, vein, fascia, buccal mucosa from patient
  • Type 2 (Allografts): Pericardium and fascia lata from donors
  • Type 3 (Xenografts): Bovine/porcine materials and small intestinal submucosa
  • Type 4 (Synthetic): Generally not recommended due to infection risks

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Biology of bone grafts.

The Orthopedic clinics of North America, 1999

Guideline

Bone Graft Options for Humeral Non-union

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Transplantation immunology.

Surgical technology international, 1993

Research

Classification and pathophysiology of skin grafts.

Clinics in dermatology, 2005

Research

Osseous grafting part I: autografts and allografts for periodontal regeneration--a literature review.

Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology, 2010

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.