What medications can reduce subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) in patients with macular degeneration?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Ranibizumab and Aflibercept for Reducing Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness in Macular Degeneration

Both ranibizumab and aflibercept significantly reduce subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration, with aflibercept demonstrating consistently greater choroidal thinning effects across multiple studies.

Comparative Efficacy on Choroidal Thickness

Aflibercept Shows Superior Choroidal Thinning

  • Aflibercept produces significantly greater reductions in choroidal thickness compared to ranibizumab at all measured locations and time points 1, 2.

  • In a prospective comparative study, aflibercept-treated eyes showed more prominent decreases in choroidal thickness at each measured location compared to ranibizumab-treated eyes (P < 0.05) 1.

  • At 6 months follow-up, aflibercept demonstrated significantly greater choroidal thickness reduction than ranibizumab at 1,3, and 6 months (P = 0.03,0.04, and 0.03, respectively) 2.

  • Subfoveal choroidal thickness decreased more profoundly with aflibercept (P = 0.001) compared to ranibizumab, particularly in eyes with choroidal vascular hyperpermeability (P = 0.002) 3.

Both Agents Produce Sustained Choroidal Thinning

  • Ranibizumab reduces subfoveal choroidal thickness from baseline over extended treatment periods, with significant decreases maintained at all measured time points through 14 months (baseline 208.3 ± 73.7 μm to 185.3 ± 70.1 μm, P < 0.001) 4.

  • Both medications affect not only the neovascular lesion but also the underlying choroid structure 2.

Lesion-Specific Responses

Type 3 Neovascularization Shows Greatest Response

  • Type 3 choroidal neovascularization lesions demonstrate the greatest choroidal thickness decrease after anti-VEGF injections (P = 0.003) 1.

  • Choroidal thinning is significantly greater in type 3 lesions treated with aflibercept compared to ranibizumab (F = 13.6, P = 0.002) 1.

Clinical Outcomes and Anatomic Changes

Macular Drying Rates

  • Post-treatment incidence of dry macula is higher in aflibercept-treated eyes (76%) versus ranibizumab-treated eyes (50%, P = 0.03) 1.

  • Aflibercept achieves remission of exudative retinal changes even in the presence of choroidal vascular hyperpermeability, with no significant difference in dry macula incidence between eyes with and without CVH (P = 0.74) 3.

Dissociation Between Anatomic and Visual Outcomes

  • Changes in choroidal thickness do not correlate with best-corrected visual acuity outcomes in either treatment group 4, 2.

  • While aflibercept shows greater effects on choroidal thickness and pigment epithelial detachment height (P = 0.043), foveal thickness changes (P = 0.85) and visual acuity improvements (P = 0.13) are not significantly different between aflibercept and ranibizumab 3.

Predictive Factors for Choroidal Response

  • Age (P = 0.001), presence of reticular drusen (P = 0.004), and size of choroidal neovascularized area (P = 0.042) predict the degree of choroidal thickness decrease with ranibizumab treatment 4.

Important Clinical Caveats

  • The greater choroidal thinning with aflibercept does not translate to superior visual outcomes, suggesting that choroidal thickness reduction alone should not be the primary treatment goal 1, 2, 3.

  • Aflibercept may be particularly advantageous in treatment-resistant cases or when choroidal vascular hyperpermeability is present, as it maintains efficacy regardless of CVH status 5, 3.

  • Fellow eyes may show minimal choroidal thickness changes during contralateral eye treatment, with only nasal measurements showing statistical significance (P = 0.04) 4.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.