Treatment of Prostate Cancer in Elderly Males
For elderly men with prostate cancer, treatment decisions must be based on health status and disease risk stratification rather than chronological age alone, with fit elderly patients receiving the same aggressive treatment as younger patients for intermediate- and high-risk disease, while watchful waiting is appropriate only for those with severe comorbidities or limited life expectancy. 1, 2
Initial Health Status Assessment
Before making any treatment decisions, elderly patients require systematic health evaluation:
- Use the G8 screening tool to assess overall health status; abnormal scores should trigger a simplified geriatric assessment evaluating comorbidities (using Cumulative Illness Score Rating-Geriatrics), functional dependence (Activities of Daily Living), and nutritional status 2
- Screen for cognitive impairment to establish patient competence in decision-making 2
- Estimate life expectancy using validated tools that account for health quartile, not just age—a 65-year-old in the healthiest quartile has a 24-year life expectancy versus 8 years in the unhealthiest quartile 1
- Avoid PSA testing in asymptomatic men over age 70 years 1
Risk Stratification
Classify disease as low, intermediate, or high risk based on PSA, Gleason score, and clinical stage 1:
- Low risk: PSA ≤10 ng/mL AND Gleason ≤6 AND stage T1c-T2a 1
- Intermediate risk: PSA 10-20 ng/mL OR Gleason 7 OR stage T2b (but not meeting high-risk criteria) 1
- High risk: PSA >20 ng/mL OR Gleason 8-10 OR stage ≥T2c 1
Treatment by Risk Category and Health Status
Low-Risk Disease
Active surveillance is the preferred option for fit elderly men with low-risk disease, involving close monitoring with PSA, repeat biopsies, and/or MRI, reserving curative treatment for progression 1
- Watchful waiting with delayed hormone therapy is appropriate for men with severe comorbidities or limited life expectancy who are unsuitable for curative treatment 1
- Avoid radical treatment in low-risk disease when life expectancy is limited, as only 13% develop metastases at 15 years and 11% die from prostate cancer 1
- Research shows watchful waiting without secondary treatment in low-risk disease ≥70 years has poorer overall survival (HR 1.938, P=0.0084), suggesting active surveillance with selective intervention is superior to pure observation 3
Intermediate- and High-Risk Disease in Fit Elderly Patients
Fit elderly patients should receive the same aggressive treatment as younger patients 2, 4:
- For high-risk disease, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for 24-36 months is the primary recommendation 5, 1
- Neoadjuvant and concurrent ADT for 4-6 months should be considered for intermediate-risk disease receiving radical radiotherapy 1
- Radical prostatectomy plus pelvic lymphadenectomy is an alternative for high-risk disease in fit elderly patients 1
- Radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy (external beam or brachytherapy) are options for intermediate-risk disease 1
- Primary ADT alone is not recommended as standard initial treatment for non-metastatic disease 1
Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Comorbidities
Shorter-course ADT (4-6 months) combined with radiation therapy is preferred for patients with moderate-to-severe comorbidities 5
- The decision to shorten ADT duration should be based on specific comorbidity assessment using validated tools, not age alone 5
- Radiotherapy is preferred over radical prostatectomy in men with life expectancy <10 years 4
Metastatic Hormone-Naïve Disease
Continuous ADT is first-line treatment for metastatic disease 1
- ADT plus docetaxel (75 mg/m² every 3 weeks) is recommended for fit patients with metastatic hormone-naïve disease 1, 6
- Patients should be informed that regular exercise reduces fatigue and improves quality of life during ADT 1
Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC)
Docetaxel chemotherapy (75 mg/m² every 3 weeks) plus prednisone is the standard treatment for metastatic CRPC 5, 6
- Abiraterone or enzalutamide are recommended for asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic chemotherapy-naïve metastatic CRPC 1
- Radium-223 is recommended for bone-predominant, symptomatic metastatic CRPC without visceral metastases 1
- Growth factor support should be considered in patients ≥65 years receiving docetaxel to decrease neutropenic complications 5
- Elderly patients (≥65 years) experience higher rates of grade 3-4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, fatigue, asthenia, and infections with docetaxel 6
Management of Treatment-Related Complications
Bone health monitoring is mandatory due to increased fracture risk in elderly patients receiving ADT 5:
- Denosumab (60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months), zoledronic acid (5 mg intravenously annually), or alendronate (70 mg orally weekly) should be prescribed when absolute fracture risk warrants therapy 1
- Screen for and intervene to prevent/treat diabetes and cardiovascular disease in men receiving ADT 1
- Prophylactic breast irradiation (8-15 Gy in 1-3 fractions) should be given 1-2 weeks before initiating antiandrogen therapy to prevent painful gynecomastia 5
Follow-Up Protocol
PSA measurement every 3 months during year 1, then every 6 months, with digital rectal examination at follow-up visits 5
- Bone scan and imaging should be performed if PSA rises or symptoms develop 5
- Following radical prostatectomy, salvage radiotherapy to the prostate bed is recommended for PSA failure, starting early (PSA <0.5 ng/mL) 1
- Early ADT is not routinely recommended for biochemical relapse unless symptomatic local disease, proven metastases, or PSA doubling time <3 months 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never deny curative treatment based solely on chronological age—elderly men are more likely to be diagnosed with aggressive cancer and inappropriately denied treatment 4
- Never use primary ADT alone for non-metastatic disease, as it is not associated with improved survival and should only be used for symptom palliation 4, 1
- Never perform immediate post-operative radiotherapy routinely after radical prostatectomy; patients with positive margins or extracapsular extension should be informed of pros and cons of adjuvant radiotherapy 1
- Never overlook the higher toxicity risk in elderly patients—those ≥65 years experience significantly higher rates of neutropenia, infections, fatigue, and other adverse events with chemotherapy 6, 5