What are the key findings and implications of the empagliflozin (Empagliflozin) landmark trials, specifically the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial, for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at high risk for cardiovascular events?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Empagliflozin Landmark Trials: Key Points for Quiz Preparation

EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial Design

The EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that enrolled 7,020 patients with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, followed for a median of 3.1 years. 1

Patient Population Characteristics

  • Mean age: 63 years with 57% having diabetes for more than 10 years 1
  • Cardiovascular disease burden: 99% had established ASCVD at baseline 1
  • Specific ASCVD manifestations: 76% had documented coronary artery disease, 23% had stroke, and 21% had peripheral artery disease 2
  • Baseline medications: 74% on metformin, 48% on insulin, 43% on sulfonylurea, 81% on renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, and 86% on antiplatelet agents 2
  • Mean baseline HbA1c: 8.1% 2

Primary Outcome Results: The 14-38-35 Rule

Empagliflozin reduced the 3-point MACE composite (cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke) by 14% (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.74-0.99), driven predominantly by a dramatic 38% reduction in cardiovascular death (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.49-0.77). 1

Breakdown of Individual Components

  • Cardiovascular death: 38% reduction (3.7% vs 5.9% absolute rates) 1
  • All-cause mortality: 32% reduction (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.57-0.82) 1
  • Hospitalization for heart failure: 35% reduction (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.50-0.85) 1
  • Non-fatal MI: Modest, non-significant effect (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.70-1.09) 1
  • Non-fatal stroke: No significant benefit, with confidence intervals overlapping 1.0 (HR 1.18; 95% CI 0.89-1.56) 1

Critical Timing Insight

The separation in event curves for cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization occurred early in the trial, suggesting the mechanism of benefit was not through traditional atherosclerosis reduction but rather through rapid hemodynamic effects. 1

Renal Protection Benefits

Empagliflozin reduced incident or worsening nephropathy by 39% (HR 0.61) and progression to macroalbuminuria by 38% (HR 0.62). 1, 3

  • Kidney protection was consistent regardless of baseline heart failure status 3
  • Benefits were observed across all KDIGO risk categories 4
  • After initial transient eGFR decrease, kidney function stabilized with empagliflozin but gradually declined with placebo 3

Total Event Burden Analysis

When analyzing total (first plus recurrent) events rather than just first events, empagliflozin showed even greater benefits: 5

  • Total MACE: RR 0.78 (95% CI 0.67-0.91), preventing 12.88 events per 1,000 patient-years 5
  • Total MI or coronary revascularization: RR 0.80 (95% CI 0.67-0.95), preventing 11.65 events per 1,000 patient-years 5
  • Total heart failure hospitalizations: RR 0.58 (95% CI 0.42-0.81), preventing 9.67 events per 1,000 patient-years 5
  • All-cause hospitalizations: RR 0.83 (95% CI 0.76-0.91), preventing 50.41 events per 1,000 patient-years 5

Consistency Across Risk Spectrum

The cardiovascular and mortality benefits of empagliflozin were consistent across the entire spectrum of baseline cardiovascular risk, including patients with and without prior MI/stroke and across all TIMI Risk Score categories. 6

  • Benefits maintained regardless of baseline heart failure status (10% of patients had HF at baseline) 1, 3
  • In patients with heart failure, empagliflozin reduced incident or worsening nephropathy or CV death by 43% 3

Mechanism of Action Essentials

Empagliflozin inhibits SGLT2 in the proximal renal tubule, which is responsible for approximately 90% of urinary glucose reabsorption, leading to glucosuria and glucose-independent cardiovascular benefits. 1

Key Mechanistic Features

  • Glucose-lowering effect is more pronounced in hyperglycemia and diminishes as blood glucose normalizes 1
  • Low hypoglycemia risk unless combined with insulin or insulin secretagogues 1
  • Additional effects include diuresis, natriuresis, weight loss, and systolic blood pressure reduction 1
  • Cardiovascular benefits appear independent of glucose-lowering effects 7

FDA Approval Distinction

Empagliflozin is the only SGLT2 inhibitor specifically FDA-approved to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death in adults with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease. 1

Glycemic Efficacy by Renal Function

The glucose-lowering efficacy of empagliflozin decreases with declining renal function: 2

  • eGFR 60 to <90 mL/min/1.73 m²: HbA1c reduction of -0.6% 2
  • eGFR 45 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m²: HbA1c reduction of -0.5% 2
  • eGFR 30 to <45 mL/min/1.73 m²: HbA1c reduction of -0.2% 2
  • eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m² (severe impairment): No discernible glucose-lowering effect 2

Safety Profile

Common adverse effects include increased urination and genital mycotic infections, with potential for volume depletion-associated events. 8

  • Genital infections were more common with empagliflozin across all KDIGO risk categories 4
  • Overall adverse event rates were similar to placebo except for genital infections 4
  • No increased risk of lower-limb amputation (unlike canagliflozin in CANVAS) 1

Guideline Recommendations

The American College of Cardiology and American Diabetes Association recommend empagliflozin for patients with type 2 diabetes and established ASCVD to reduce cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization. 1, 9

  • Benefits are seen regardless of baseline HbA1c or heart failure status 1, 9
  • Empagliflozin provides cardiorenal protection independent of its glucose-lowering effects 7, 9

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.