What are the risks associated with intravenous (IV) iron transfusion?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Risks of Intravenous Iron Transfusion

Intravenous iron carries a 4.3% risk of infusion-related adverse events, with acute hypersensitivity reactions being the most concerning but rare complication, while infection risk remains controversial and formulation-dependent differences in safety profiles exist. 1

Acute Infusion Reactions

Hypersensitivity Reactions

  • All forms of IV iron may cause acute adverse events including anaphylactoid reactions, hypotension, shortness of breath, and chills, though true anaphylaxis occurs in fewer than 1 in 200,000 administrations 1
  • The primary mechanism is complement activation-related pseudo-allergy (CARPA), not IgE-mediated anaphylaxis, caused by labile free iron released from iron carbohydrate nanoparticles 2, 3
  • Hypersensitivity reactions occur in 2.1% to 8.7% of administrations depending on the formulation used 4

Formulation-Specific Risk Differences

  • Iron dextran (especially high-molecular-weight) causes more frequent and severe anaphylactoid reactions compared to non-dextran formulations like ferric gluconate or iron sucrose 1
  • Ferric carboxymaltose demonstrates a 75% lower risk of hypersensitivity reactions compared to iron isomaltoside-1000 (2.1% vs 8.7%) 4
  • Ferric derisomaltose shows significantly lower incidence of serious/severe hypersensitivity reactions (0.14%) compared to ferric carboxymaltose (1.08%) 5

Respiratory Manifestations

  • Respiratory symptoms include shortness of breath, transient cough, bronchospasm, and stridor, typically occurring as part of CARPA rather than isolated pulmonary disease 2
  • Moderate reactions present with transient cough and dyspnea, while severe reactions include stridor, bronchospasm, and angioedema 2
  • Patients with severe asthma, eczema, mastocytosis, or prior IV iron reactions face higher risk for respiratory complications 2

Infection Risk

Evidence Summary

  • A 2021 meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials found a 26% increased risk of infection with IV iron (RR 1.26,95% CI 1.09-1.44) 1
  • However, randomized trials in hemodialysis patients have not consistently demonstrated increased infection rates, though observational studies show associations between ferritin levels >4500 ng/ml and infections 1
  • The biological plausibility exists as iron is required for pathogen growth and IV iron increases non-transferrin-bound iron, which impairs T-cell and neutrophil function 1

Clinical Implications

  • IV iron should be used with caution or avoided entirely in patients with active infection, as animal studies suggest harm in the presence of severe infection 1
  • No increased infection risk has been observed in cancer patients receiving IV iron in controlled trials 1

Other Significant Risks

Hypophosphatemia

  • Treatment-emergent hypophosphatemia occurs in 2.1% of adult patients and 13% of pediatric patients receiving ferric carboxymaltose 6
  • Hypophosphatemic osteomalacia has been reported in post-marketing surveillance 6

Cardiovascular Effects

  • Hypotension occurs during infusions, particularly with rapid administration 1
  • Tachycardia and chest discomfort have been reported 6
  • Concomitant administration with cardiotoxic chemotherapy should be avoided 1

Injection Site Complications

  • Injection site reactions occur in 3-8% of administrations 6
  • Extravasation occurs in 0.2-2% of cases 6
  • Injection site discoloration can occur in 1.4% of patients and may persist for weeks to months 7, 6

Pregnancy-Specific Risks

  • Severe hypersensitivity reactions may cause fetal bradycardia, especially in the second and third trimesters 6
  • Early pregnancy is considered a contraindication to iron infusions 3

Risk Factors for Adverse Reactions

Patient-Specific Factors

  • Previous reaction to IV iron infusion 3
  • Multiple drug allergies 3
  • Severe atopy 3
  • Systemic inflammatory diseases 3
  • Presence of comorbidities increases hypersensitivity risk by a factor of 3.6 regardless of iron formulation 4

Administration-Related Factors

  • Fast infusion rates increase risk of adverse reactions 1, 3
  • The form, dose, and rate of infusion all influence adverse event risk 1

Safety Monitoring Requirements

Pre-Infusion Assessment

  • IV iron should only be administered by staff trained to evaluate and manage anaphylactic reactions with resuscitation facilities immediately available 1
  • Pre-infusion assessment should evaluate infusion reaction risks 1

During and Post-Infusion

  • Patients require close observation for hypersensitivity symptoms for at least 30 minutes following each administration 1
  • Vital signs monitoring is essential, particularly during the first 10 minutes 2
  • Proper IV line placement must be ensured to prevent extravasation 2, 7

Rechallenge Considerations

  • Re-administration after a previous adverse reaction is plausible in over 80% of cases when the initial reaction was mild to moderate 8
  • Rechallenge depends on the nature and severity of the prior reaction, with consideration of alternative formulations 8
  • Rechallenge after severe hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis with the same product has not been reported in safety studies 8

Long-Term Safety Concerns

Oxidative Stress and Inflammation

  • IV iron induces oxidative stress and generates pro-inflammatory substances in animal models, potentially related to free iron toxicity 1
  • The long-term clinical significance of these observations in patients remains uncertain 1

Vascular Access

  • Frequent IV iron infusion may jeopardize future vascular access options, particularly relevant in hemodialysis patients 1

Tumor Progression in Cancer Patients

  • No trials investigating IV iron with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents have shown tumor induction or increased progression 1
  • One study with longer follow-up (median 1.4 years) in lymphoid malignancies showed no negative effect on progression-free survival 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.