What Heart Rate Variability (HRV) metrics do Wellue wearable and Oura 4 monitor?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

HRV Metrics Comparison: Wellue vs Oura 4

I cannot provide a direct comparison of specific HRV metrics between Wellue wearables and Oura Ring Generation 4, as the provided evidence does not contain technical specifications or validation data for Wellue devices.

What the Evidence Shows About Oura Ring 4

The Oura Ring Generation 4 demonstrates excellent accuracy for nocturnal heart rate variability measurements, specifically for RMSSD (root mean square of successive differences), which is the primary HRV metric it reports. 1

Validated HRV Metrics for Oura 4

Time-Domain Metrics:

  • RMSSD: Highest accuracy (CCC = 0.99, MAPE = 5.96%) - this is the primary HRV metric displayed to users 1
  • AVNN (average normal-to-normal intervals): High accuracy when averaged per night 2
  • pNN50 (percentage of successive intervals differing >50ms): Acceptable accuracy in night-averaged measurements 2
  • SDNN (standard deviation of NN intervals): Moderate accuracy, better with night-averaging 2

Frequency-Domain Metrics:

  • HF (high frequency power): Acceptable accuracy in night-averaged measurements 2
  • LF (low frequency power): High error rates, not recommended for clinical use 2
  • LF:HF ratio: High error rates in both short and long measurements 2

Critical Accuracy Considerations

Data quality thresholds matter significantly - Oura's accuracy improves dramatically when:

  • Using validity proportion thresholds ≥80% for each 5-minute segment 3
  • Aggregating measurements over ≥30-minute windows rather than 5-minute segments 3
  • Averaging across entire nights rather than spot measurements 2, 1

Age-related accuracy differences exist - More than half of older participants (≥45 years) exceeded 10% median absolute percentage error for HRV measures, even with optimal data quality 3

Limitations Without Wellue Data

The evidence provided focuses exclusively on validation methodologies for consumer wearables [4-4] and specific validation studies for Oura Ring [3-2,1], but contains no information about Wellue device specifications or validated metrics. Without manufacturer specifications or independent validation studies for Wellue devices, I cannot determine which HRV metrics they measure or their accuracy.

What to Look For in Wellue Specifications

Based on validation standards for consumer wearables [4-4], you should verify:

  • Whether Wellue provides beat-to-beat (RR) interval data or only summary metrics
  • Which specific time-domain and frequency-domain HRV parameters are calculated
  • Whether independent validation studies exist comparing Wellue to ECG criterion measures
  • The device's accuracy during different activities (rest, sleep, exercise) 4

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.