What is the systematic approach to assessing an allergy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Systematic Approach to Allergy Assessment

Begin with a detailed clinical history focusing on temporal relationship between exposure and symptoms, as this is the most critical diagnostic step—a positive test without clinical correlation indicates only sensitization, not allergy. 1

Definition

  • Allergy: An exaggerated immune system response to external substances that occurs reproducibly on exposure, causing adverse health effects through specific immune mechanisms (primarily IgE-mediated, but also mixed IgE/cell-mediated or non-IgE-mediated) 1, 2

Classification

By Mechanism:

  • IgE-mediated: Immediate reactions (minutes to 2 hours); includes anaphylaxis, urticaria, allergic rhinitis, food allergy 1
  • Mixed IgE and cell-mediated: Delayed onset; includes eosinophilic esophagitis, atopic dermatitis 1
  • Non-IgE-mediated: Cell-mediated reactions; includes food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome 1

By Allergen Type:

  • Inhalants: Pollens (grass, tree), house dust mite, animal dander, molds 1, 2
  • Foods: Milk, egg, peanut, tree nuts, shellfish, fish, wheat, soy 1
  • Drugs: Penicillins, cephalosporins, NSAIDs 1
  • Venoms: Bee, wasp 2
  • Contact allergens: Latex, metals, chemicals 2

Differential Diagnosis

Must Exclude:

  • Non-allergic adverse reactions: Gastrointestinal symptoms alone (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea without other features), headache, palpitations, blurred vision—these are NOT allergic 1
  • Vasovagal reactions: Syncope without other allergic features 1
  • Toxic reactions: Dose-dependent, non-immune mediated 3
  • Pharmacologic effects: Histamine release from foods (scombroid), caffeine effects 1
  • Food intolerance: Lactose intolerance, celiac disease (non-immune or different immune mechanism) 2
  • Panic/anxiety disorders: Mimicking anaphylaxis symptoms 1
  • Other causes of urticaria: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (not allergic), physical urticarias 1

History Taking

Character of Reactions:

Timing and Onset:

  • Immediate reactions (minutes to 2 hours post-exposure): Suggests IgE-mediated allergy 1
  • Delayed reactions (hours to days): Consider non-IgE or mixed mechanisms 1
  • No temporal association: Rules out allergy; label can be removed 1

Symptom Pattern:

  • Cutaneous: Urticaria, angioedema, flushing, pruritus 1
  • Respiratory: Dyspnea, wheeze, stridor, throat tightness, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion 1
  • Gastrointestinal: Vomiting, cramping, diarrhea (when occurring WITH other organ system involvement) 1
  • Cardiovascular: Hypotension, syncope, dizziness, chest pain 1
  • Neurologic: Sense of impending doom, confusion (in severe reactions) 1

Reproducibility:

  • Reactions must occur consistently with exposure to be considered allergy 1
  • Single isolated event: Less likely to represent true allergy 1

Red Flags (Anaphylaxis):

NIAID/FAAN Criteria—Anaphylaxis is highly likely when ANY ONE criterion is met: 1

  1. Acute onset (minutes to hours) with skin/mucosal involvement (urticaria, flushing, lip/tongue swelling) PLUS either:

    • Respiratory compromise (dyspnea, wheeze, stridor, hypoxemia)
    • Hypotension or end-organ dysfunction
  2. Two or more of the following rapidly after likely allergen exposure:

    • Skin/mucosal involvement
    • Respiratory compromise
    • Hypotension or associated symptoms
    • Gastrointestinal symptoms (cramping, vomiting)
  3. Hypotension alone after exposure to known allergen for that patient 1

Additional High-Risk Features:

  • Previous severe reactions or anaphylaxis 1
  • Asthma (increases risk of severe respiratory reactions) 1
  • Cardiovascular disease (increases morbidity/mortality) 1
  • Concurrent beta-blocker or ACE inhibitor use (may worsen/prolong reactions) 1

Risk Factors:

For Developing Allergy:

  • Atopic predisposition: Personal or family history of atopic dermatitis, asthma, allergic rhinitis 1
  • Skin barrier dysfunction: Eczema, particularly in infancy 1
  • Delayed food introduction: For peanut and egg specifically 1
  • Route of sensitization: Cutaneous exposure may increase risk 1

For Severe Reactions:

  • Asthma (poorly controlled increases risk) 1
  • Previous anaphylaxis 1
  • Adolescent/young adult age (higher risk behavior, delayed epinephrine use) 1
  • Concurrent medications: Beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors 1
  • Exercise (in food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis) 4

For True Allergy (vs. Sensitization):

  • Shorter interval between reaction and testing (<1 year) increases likelihood of confirmed allergy 1
  • Penicillin allergy: 1.5× higher risk of true allergy compared to other beta-lactams 1
  • Cephalosporin allergy label: 3× higher odds of confirmed allergy (OR 2.96) 1

Additional History Elements:

  • Subsequent tolerance: If allergen consumed since index reaction without symptoms, allergy label can be removed 1
  • Dose-response: Amount of allergen that triggers reaction 4
  • Cofactors: Exercise, NSAIDs, alcohol, menstruation 4
  • Treatment received: Response to antihistamines vs. requiring epinephrine 1
  • Concurrent medications: Antihistamines, corticosteroids may mask symptoms 1
  • Environmental exposures: Seasonal patterns for inhalant allergies 1, 5

Physical Examination (Focused)

Head and Neck:

  • Nasal examination: Pale, boggy turbinates; clear rhinorrhea; nasal polyps (suggests allergic rhinitis) 1, 6
  • Conjunctival injection: Allergic conjunctivitis 6
  • Allergic shiners: Dark circles under eyes from venous congestion 6
  • Dennie-Morgan lines: Extra fold of skin below lower eyelid 6
  • Allergic salute crease: Horizontal nasal crease from chronic rubbing 6
  • Oropharynx: Cobblestoning of posterior pharynx, tonsillar hypertrophy 6

Respiratory:

  • Auscultation: Wheezing, prolonged expiratory phase (asthma) 1
  • Respiratory rate and effort: Increased work of breathing 1

Skin:

  • Urticaria: Raised, erythematous, pruritic wheals 1
  • Angioedema: Non-pitting swelling of deeper tissues (lips, tongue, face) 1
  • Atopic dermatitis: Eczematous changes, lichenification 6
  • Dermographism: Wheal formation with stroking (may cause false-positive skin tests) 7

Cardiovascular:

  • Blood pressure: Hypotension in anaphylaxis 1
  • Heart rate: Tachycardia or bradycardia (in severe anaphylaxis) 1
  • Capillary refill: Delayed in shock 1

During Acute Reaction:

  • Assess airway patency: Stridor, voice changes, inability to swallow 1
  • Respiratory distress: Accessory muscle use, cyanosis 1
  • Mental status: Confusion, loss of consciousness 1

Investigations

First-Line Testing:

Skin Prick Testing (SPT):

  • Preferred initial test for inhalant and food allergies due to higher sensitivity than serum testing 5, 7
  • Technique: Place allergen extract on skin, prick through epidermis 7
  • Positive result: Wheal ≥3 mm larger than negative control at 15-20 minutes 1, 7
  • Advantages: Rapid results, high sensitivity, cost-effective 5, 7
  • Limitations: Affected by antihistamines (discontinue 3-7 days prior), dermographism, cannot use if severe eczema or recent anaphylaxis 7
  • Interpretation: Positive test = sensitization only; must correlate with clinical history 1, 3

Serum Specific IgE Testing:

  • Alternative when SPT contraindicated (severe eczema, dermographism, inability to stop antihistamines, recent anaphylaxis) 1, 5
  • Advantages: Not affected by medications, no risk of systemic reaction, can be done with active skin disease 5
  • Limitations: Lower sensitivity than SPT, more expensive, delayed results 5
  • Interpretation: Detectable sIgE (≥0.35 kU/L) indicates sensitization, not necessarily clinical allergy 3
  • Predictive values: Higher levels increase likelihood of clinical allergy, but thresholds vary by allergen and age 1

When to Perform Allergy Testing:

Indications: 1

  • Inadequate response to empiric treatment
  • Diagnosis uncertain based on history
  • Need to identify specific causative allergen to target therapy (immunotherapy, specific avoidance)

Do NOT test: 1

  • When diagnosis clear from history and empiric treatment effective
  • Screening asymptomatic individuals (high false-positive rate)

Advanced/Specialized Testing:

Component-Resolved Diagnostics (CRD):

  • Measures IgE to specific allergen proteins rather than whole allergen extracts 1
  • Use: Refine diagnosis when standard testing equivocal, predict severity, assess cross-reactivity 1
  • Example: Ara h 2 for peanut allergy (higher specificity for clinical allergy) 1
  • Availability: Limited to specialized centers in many regions 1

Basophil Activation Test (BAT):

  • Superior specificity and comparable sensitivity to sIgE and SPT 1
  • Uses: Monitor resolution, assess immunotherapy response, potentially reduce need for oral food challenges 1
  • Limitation: Not widely available, requires specialized laboratory 1

Oral Food Challenge (OFC):

  • Gold standard for confirming food allergy diagnosis or resolution 1
  • Indications: Discrepancy between history and testing, evaluating tolerance development, before liberalizing diet 1
  • Settings: Low-risk challenges in outpatient clinic; high-risk in monitored setting with immediate access to epinephrine 1
  • Risk stratification: sIgE >15 kU/L associated with moderate-severe reactions 1
  • Contraindications: Recent anaphylaxis, uncontrolled asthma, acute illness 1

Testing NOT Recommended:

  • Intradermal testing for food allergy (high false-positive rate, increased systemic reaction risk) 1
  • Total serum IgE: Does not diagnose specific allergies 1
  • Atopy patch testing: Not standardized, limited evidence 1
  • Sinonasal imaging: Not routine for allergic rhinitis diagnosis 1
  • Unvalidated tests: IgG testing, applied kinesiology, electrodermal testing, hair analysis, cytotoxic testing 3

Laboratory Findings During Acute Anaphylaxis:

Serum Tryptase:

  • Timing: Obtain 30 minutes to 2 hours after symptom onset 1
  • Interpretation: Elevated level supports anaphylaxis diagnosis, but normal level does not exclude it (poor sensitivity) 1
  • Baseline: Consider baseline tryptase if elevated during reaction (to assess for mastocytosis) 1

Empiric Treatment

Acute Anaphylaxis Management:

Immediate:

  • Epinephrine 0.01 mg/kg IM (max 0.5 mg adults, 0.3 mg children) into anterolateral thigh—FIRST-LINE therapy 1
  • Repeat every 5-15 minutes as needed for persistent symptoms 1
  • Position patient supine with legs elevated (or left lateral decubitus if vomiting/pregnant) 1
  • Call emergency services immediately 1

Adjunctive (AFTER epinephrine):

  • H1-antihistamine: Diphenhydramine 25-50 mg IV/IM/PO 1
  • H2-antihistamine: Ranitidine 50 mg IV or famotidine 20 mg IV 1
  • Corticosteroids: Methylprednisolone 1-2 mg/kg IV (may reduce biphasic reactions, though evidence limited) 1
  • Bronchodilators: Albuterol for bronchospasm 1
  • IV fluids: 1-2 L bolus for hypotension 1
  • Oxygen: Maintain saturation >90% 1

Observation:

  • Minimum 4-6 hours after symptom resolution (risk of biphasic reaction 1-20%) 1
  • Longer observation if severe reaction, delayed epinephrine administration, history of biphasic reactions, or ongoing symptoms 1

Allergic Rhinitis:

First-Line:

  • Intranasal corticosteroids: Most effective pharmacotherapy; use daily for best results 1, 5
  • Oral antihistamines: Second-generation (cetirizine, loratadine, fexofenadine) preferred over first-generation 1
  • Allergen avoidance: For identified clinically relevant allergens 1, 5

Second-Line:

  • Intranasal antihistamines: Azelastine 1
  • Leukotriene receptor antagonists: Montelukast 1

Refractory Cases:

  • Allergen immunotherapy (subcutaneous or sublingual) for inadequate response to pharmacotherapy 1, 5
  • Target only allergens correlating with clinical symptoms 5

Food Allergy:

Mainstay:

  • Strict avoidance of confirmed food allergens 1
  • Epinephrine auto-injector prescription for all with IgE-mediated food allergy (except possibly resolved allergy or very low-risk situations with shared decision-making) 1
  • Emergency action plan: Written instructions for recognizing and treating reactions 1

Emerging:

  • Oral immunotherapy: Under investigation; not standard of care 1
  • Early introduction: Peanut and egg introduction at 4-6 months reduces allergy development 1

Drug Allergy:

Immediate:

  • Discontinue suspected drug 1
  • Treat reaction as per severity (antihistamines for mild, epinephrine for anaphylaxis) 1

Future Management:

  • Avoid drug class if confirmed allergy 1
  • Consider alternatives: Different drug class or desensitization if no alternatives 1
  • Remove label if low-risk features present (see History section) 1

Indications to Refer to Allergist

Mandatory Referral:

  • All patients after anaphylaxis: For education, epinephrine auto-injector training, identification of trigger, and long-term management plan 1
  • Inadequate response to empiric treatment for allergic rhinitis after appropriate trial 1
  • Uncertain diagnosis requiring specialized testing 1
  • Need for allergen immunotherapy: Requires specialist administration and monitoring 1, 5

Consider Referral:

  • Multiple food allergies: Complex dietary management 1
  • Occupational allergies: Workplace modifications needed 1
  • Severe or poorly controlled asthma with allergic triggers 1
  • Need for oral food challenge: To confirm diagnosis or assess tolerance 1
  • Drug allergy requiring desensitization: No alternative medications available 1
  • Pediatric food allergy: Early intervention and monitoring for resolution 1

Critical Pitfalls

Diagnostic Errors:

  • Equating positive test with clinical allergy: Up to 54% of general population has positive skin tests without symptoms; sensitization ≠ allergy 1, 3
  • Testing without clinical correlation: Leads to unnecessary avoidance, anxiety, and cost 1, 3
  • Over-reliance on self-reported allergy: Overestimates prevalence 4-fold (12% self-report vs. 3% confirmed) 1
  • Using unvalidated tests: IgG testing, applied kinesiology, electrodermal testing have no evidence base and cause harm through misdiagnosis 3
  • Failing to distinguish food allergy from intolerance: Different mechanisms and management 2
  • Accepting allergy label without verification: >90% of penicillin allergy labels can be removed after proper assessment 1

Management Errors:

  • Delaying epinephrine in anaphylaxis: Antihistamines and corticosteroids are NOT first-line; epinephrine is the only life-saving treatment 1
  • Discharging too early: Minimum 4-6 hour observation required due to biphasic reaction risk 1
  • Not prescribing epinephrine auto-injector: All patients with IgE-mediated food allergy or history of anaphylaxis require prescription and training 1
  • Failing to provide emergency action plan: Written instructions critical for patient/caregiver recognition and treatment 1
  • Not referring after anaphylaxis: Specialist evaluation mandatory for all anaphylaxis patients 1
  • Unnecessary strict avoidance: Most patients are not "highly allergic"; consider individualized approach for low-dose tolerant patients with shared decision-making 4

Testing Pitfalls:

  • Performing skin tests on antihistamines: False negatives; discontinue 3-7 days prior 7
  • Intradermal testing for food allergy: High false-positive rate and systemic reaction risk 1
  • Testing during acute reaction: Wait 4-6 weeks for IgE levels to stabilize 1
  • Not obtaining baseline tryptase: If elevated during reaction, baseline needed to assess for mastocytosis 1
  • Ordering imaging for allergic rhinitis: Not indicated as routine diagnostic test 1

Treatment Pitfalls:

  • Using expired epinephrine: Check expiration dates regularly 1
  • Wrong epinephrine route: Must be intramuscular (IM) into thigh, not subcutaneous or IV (unless by trained personnel in monitored setting) 1
  • Relying on antihistamines alone for anaphylaxis: Delays definitive treatment and increases mortality 1
  • Starting immunotherapy without proper evaluation: Must confirm clinically relevant allergens first 1, 5
  • Implementing environmental controls without testing: Expensive and often ineffective if allergens not identified 1

Documentation Pitfalls:

  • Incomplete allergy label information: Must document specific symptoms, timing, dose, route, treatment, and outcome 1
  • Not updating allergy status: Remove labels when criteria for low/no risk met 1
  • Failing to document subsequent tolerance: If allergen consumed without reaction, allergy label should be removed 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Allergy. Conventional and alternative concepts. A report of the Royal College of Physicians Committee on Clinical Immunology and Allergy.

Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1992

Research

Managing Food Allergy When the Patient Is Not Highly Allergic.

The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice, 2022

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach and Management of Complete Respiratory Disease (CRD) Allergy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Physical findings in allergy.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America, 2011

Research

Skin testing for inhalant allergy.

International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2014

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.