First-Line Treatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Methotrexate should be started immediately as the first-line treatment for rheumatoid arthritis, at a dose of 15-25 mg weekly (oral or subcutaneous) with folic acid supplementation, combined with short-term low-dose glucocorticoids for up to 6 months. 1
Initial Treatment Strategy
Methotrexate as Anchor Drug
- Start methotrexate as soon as RA is diagnosed at 15 mg weekly, rapidly escalating to 25-30 mg weekly within a few weeks to reach optimal dosing 1, 2
- Administer with folic acid 1 mg daily to reduce side effects 2, 3
- Subcutaneous administration should be considered if oral methotrexate at doses >15 mg/week causes gastrointestinal side effects or shows inadequate response, as bioavailability is superior 4
- Maximum efficacy may not be evident until 4-6 months of treatment, so maintain optimal dosing (25-30 mg weekly) for at least 3 months before declaring treatment failure 1
Glucocorticoid Bridge Therapy
- Add low-dose glucocorticoids (prednisone 5-10 mg daily or equivalent) to methotrexate at treatment initiation 1
- Taper glucocorticoids as rapidly as clinically feasible, ideally within 6 months 1
- Glucocorticoids provide superior outcomes when added to methotrexate monotherapy or combination synthetic DMARDs, regardless of the specific DMARD regimen 1
Alternative First-Line Options
When Methotrexate is Contraindicated
If methotrexate cannot be used due to hepatic disease, renal disease, or early intolerance:
- Leflunomide 20 mg daily is the preferred alternative 1
- Sulfasalazine 3-4 g daily (enteric-coated) is equally effective and safe in pregnancy 1
- Both have similar efficacy to methotrexate and can be combined with biologics if needed 1
Combination Synthetic DMARD Strategy
- Combination therapy with multiple conventional synthetic DMARDs (e.g., methotrexate + sulfasalazine + hydroxychloroquine) can be used as first-line treatment instead of methotrexate monotherapy, particularly in DMARD-naïve patients 1
- This approach is equally valid as monotherapy when combined with glucocorticoids 1
Treatment Targets and Monitoring
Goal-Oriented Approach
- Aim for clinical remission or low disease activity as the treatment target 1
- Monitor disease activity every 1-3 months using composite measures (tender/swollen joint counts, pain scales, functional assessments) 1, 2
- If no improvement by 3 months or target not reached by 6 months, adjust therapy 1
When to Escalate Treatment
After 3-6 months of optimal methotrexate therapy (with glucocorticoids):
- If poor prognostic factors are present (RF/ACPA positive, high disease activity, early erosions): add a biologic DMARD (TNF inhibitor, abatacept, tocilizumab, or rituximab) combined with methotrexate 1
- If poor prognostic factors are absent: switch to another conventional synthetic DMARD strategy before considering biologics 1
Critical Implementation Details
Dosing Optimization
- Reach 25-30 mg weekly methotrexate within a few weeks of starting treatment 1
- Maintain maximum tolerated dose for at least 8 weeks, recognizing full efficacy requires 4-6 months 1
- Consider subcutaneous route if oral dosing >15 mg/week is poorly tolerated or ineffective 4
Baseline Monitoring
- Obtain CBC, liver enzymes, creatinine, and hepatitis B/C screening before starting methotrexate 2, 3
- Screen for latent tuberculosis before any biologic therapy 5
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not underdose methotrexate - many patients receive suboptimal doses (<15 mg/week) and are prematurely labeled as treatment failures 1, 4
- Do not wait too long to escalate - if no improvement by 3 months, begin adjusting therapy rather than waiting the full 6 months 1
- Do not continue glucocorticoids long-term - taper as rapidly as possible to minimize toxicity while maintaining disease control 1
Special Considerations
Exceptional Rapid Escalation
In rare patients with exceptionally high risk of rapid progression (very high disease activity, high-titer autoantibodies, early erosive disease), starting a biologic agent plus methotrexate as first-line therapy may be considered, though this is not standard practice and has lower cost-effectiveness on a population level 1