What are the PECARN (Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network) criteria for determining the need for a computed tomography (CT) scan in children with minor head trauma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

PECARN Criteria for CT Imaging in Pediatric Head Trauma

The PECARN criteria stratify children with minor head trauma into three risk categories based on age-specific clinical features, with very low-risk children safely avoiding CT, intermediate-risk children managed by observation versus selective CT, and high-risk children requiring immediate CT imaging. 1, 2

Risk Stratification by Age Group

Children ≥2 Years of Age

Very Low Risk (CT NOT indicated):

  • GCS = 15 with normal mental status
  • No signs of basilar skull fracture
  • No history of loss of consciousness
  • No vomiting
  • No severe mechanism of injury
  • No severe headache
  • Risk of clinically important TBI: <0.02% 1, 2

Intermediate Risk (CT may be considered vs. observation):

  • GCS = 15 with normal mental status
  • No basilar skull fracture signs
  • BUT one or more of: loss of consciousness, vomiting, severe mechanism of injury, or severe headache
  • Risk of clinically important TBI: ~0.8% 1

High Risk (CT strongly recommended):

  • GCS = 14 or other signs of altered mental status, OR
  • Signs of basilar skull fracture
  • Risk of clinically important TBI: ~4.3% 1, 2

Children <2 Years of Age

Very Low Risk (CT NOT indicated):

  • GCS = 15 with normal mental status
  • No palpable skull fracture
  • No nonfrontal scalp hematoma
  • Loss of consciousness ≤5 seconds
  • No severe mechanism of injury
  • Acting normally per parents
  • Risk of clinically important TBI: <0.02% with 100% sensitivity and 100% NPV validated in >4,000 children 1

Intermediate Risk (CT may be considered vs. observation):

  • GCS = 15 with normal mental status
  • No palpable skull fracture
  • BUT one or more of: loss of consciousness >5 seconds, severe mechanism of injury, or not acting normally per parent
  • Risk of clinically important TBI: ~0.9% 1

High Risk (CT strongly recommended):

  • GCS = 14 or other signs of altered mental status, OR
  • Any palpable skull fracture
  • Risk of clinically important TBI: ~4.4% 1, 2

Clinical Decision Algorithm

For Very Low-Risk Patients:

  • Safely discharge without CT imaging 1, 2
  • Provide written discharge instructions including warning signs: persistent vomiting, increasing drowsiness, seizures, worsening headache, behavioral changes, unsteady gait, unequal pupils 3, 4

For Intermediate-Risk Patients:

  • Consider clinical observation as preferred strategy over immediate CT 1
  • CT may be obtained instead of observation when: parental preference for imaging, multiple risk factors present, worsening symptoms during observation, or young infants where observational assessment is challenging 1
  • Planned observation reduces CT utilization by 80% without missing clinically important injuries 5

For High-Risk Patients:

  • Obtain immediate non-contrast head CT 1, 2
  • CT provides rapid acquisition, excellent sensitivity for acute hemorrhage and fractures, and requires no sedation 2, 3

Important Clinical Considerations

Special Population - Infants <3 Months:

  • Maintain lower threshold for neuroimaging as these infants have increased risk of significant injury with subtle findings 4, 6
  • Even low-risk infants <3 months remain at 5.1% risk for TBI on CT and 4.6% risk for skull fractures, despite only 0.2% risk of clinically important TBI 6

Imaging Modality Selection:

  • CT is the first-line modality due to rapid acquisition, no sedation requirement, and excellent sensitivity for acute hemorrhage 2, 3
  • Skull radiographs are inadequate as they miss up to 50% of intracranial injuries 1
  • MRI is more sensitive but impractical acutely due to length of examination and frequent need for sedation in young children 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid:

  • Do not obtain CT in very low-risk patients meeting all PECARN criteria - this exposes them to unnecessary radiation with <0.02% risk of injury 1, 2
  • Do not rely on skull radiographs - they have only 63% sensitivity for fractures and cannot detect intracranial injuries 4
  • Consider non-accidental trauma in infants <1 year with unexplained injuries, inconsistent history, or multiple fractures 3, 4
  • Weekend presentation, older age, and any loss of consciousness are associated with higher CT utilization rates in intermediate-risk patients 7

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Indications for CT Scan in Pediatric Head Trauma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Assessment of Pediatric Head Injury

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Evaluation of Head Injury in Infants

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

The Effect of Patient Observation on Cranial Computed Tomography Rates in Children With Minor Head Trauma.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2020

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.