PECARN Criteria for CT Imaging in Pediatric Head Trauma
The PECARN criteria stratify children with minor head trauma into three risk categories based on age-specific clinical features, with very low-risk children safely avoiding CT, intermediate-risk children managed by observation versus selective CT, and high-risk children requiring immediate CT imaging. 1, 2
Risk Stratification by Age Group
Children ≥2 Years of Age
Very Low Risk (CT NOT indicated):
- GCS = 15 with normal mental status
- No signs of basilar skull fracture
- No history of loss of consciousness
- No vomiting
- No severe mechanism of injury
- No severe headache
- Risk of clinically important TBI: <0.02% 1, 2
Intermediate Risk (CT may be considered vs. observation):
- GCS = 15 with normal mental status
- No basilar skull fracture signs
- BUT one or more of: loss of consciousness, vomiting, severe mechanism of injury, or severe headache
- Risk of clinically important TBI: ~0.8% 1
High Risk (CT strongly recommended):
- GCS = 14 or other signs of altered mental status, OR
- Signs of basilar skull fracture
- Risk of clinically important TBI: ~4.3% 1, 2
Children <2 Years of Age
Very Low Risk (CT NOT indicated):
- GCS = 15 with normal mental status
- No palpable skull fracture
- No nonfrontal scalp hematoma
- Loss of consciousness ≤5 seconds
- No severe mechanism of injury
- Acting normally per parents
- Risk of clinically important TBI: <0.02% with 100% sensitivity and 100% NPV validated in >4,000 children 1
Intermediate Risk (CT may be considered vs. observation):
- GCS = 15 with normal mental status
- No palpable skull fracture
- BUT one or more of: loss of consciousness >5 seconds, severe mechanism of injury, or not acting normally per parent
- Risk of clinically important TBI: ~0.9% 1
High Risk (CT strongly recommended):
- GCS = 14 or other signs of altered mental status, OR
- Any palpable skull fracture
- Risk of clinically important TBI: ~4.4% 1, 2
Clinical Decision Algorithm
For Very Low-Risk Patients:
- Safely discharge without CT imaging 1, 2
- Provide written discharge instructions including warning signs: persistent vomiting, increasing drowsiness, seizures, worsening headache, behavioral changes, unsteady gait, unequal pupils 3, 4
For Intermediate-Risk Patients:
- Consider clinical observation as preferred strategy over immediate CT 1
- CT may be obtained instead of observation when: parental preference for imaging, multiple risk factors present, worsening symptoms during observation, or young infants where observational assessment is challenging 1
- Planned observation reduces CT utilization by 80% without missing clinically important injuries 5
For High-Risk Patients:
- Obtain immediate non-contrast head CT 1, 2
- CT provides rapid acquisition, excellent sensitivity for acute hemorrhage and fractures, and requires no sedation 2, 3
Important Clinical Considerations
Special Population - Infants <3 Months:
- Maintain lower threshold for neuroimaging as these infants have increased risk of significant injury with subtle findings 4, 6
- Even low-risk infants <3 months remain at 5.1% risk for TBI on CT and 4.6% risk for skull fractures, despite only 0.2% risk of clinically important TBI 6
Imaging Modality Selection:
- CT is the first-line modality due to rapid acquisition, no sedation requirement, and excellent sensitivity for acute hemorrhage 2, 3
- Skull radiographs are inadequate as they miss up to 50% of intracranial injuries 1
- MRI is more sensitive but impractical acutely due to length of examination and frequent need for sedation in young children 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid:
- Do not obtain CT in very low-risk patients meeting all PECARN criteria - this exposes them to unnecessary radiation with <0.02% risk of injury 1, 2
- Do not rely on skull radiographs - they have only 63% sensitivity for fractures and cannot detect intracranial injuries 4
- Consider non-accidental trauma in infants <1 year with unexplained injuries, inconsistent history, or multiple fractures 3, 4
- Weekend presentation, older age, and any loss of consciousness are associated with higher CT utilization rates in intermediate-risk patients 7